[Bug c++/57739] New: Weaker diagnostics of failed overload resolution when operators are declared as friends instead of externally

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: unmobile at gmail dot com Created attachment 30395 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30395&acti

[Bug c++/57739] Weaker diagnostics of failed overload resolution when operators are declared as friends instead of externally

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57739 --- Comment #1 from Phil Miller --- Created attachment 30396 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30396&action=edit Example of completely unhelpful overload resolution

[Bug c++/57739] Weaker diagnostics of failed overload resolution when operators are declared as friends instead of externally

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57739 --- Comment #2 from Phil Miller --- I've observed the same behavior as far back as g++ 4.4.3, modulo differences in column number and caret display.

[Bug c++/57743] New: Code accepted by other recent compilers, but not by g++ - possibly failure to activate ADL

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: unmobile at gmail dot com Created attachment 30401 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30401&action=edit Reduced test case $ g++ --ve

[Bug sanitizer/59410] tsan tests fail with address randomization disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59410 Phil Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unmobile at gmail dot com --- Comment #38

[Bug c++/46097] Switch to warn of global variables in a C++ shared object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46097 Phil Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unmobile at gmail dot com --- Comment #32

[Bug c++/57743] Code accepted by other recent compilers, but not by g++ - possibly failure to activate ADL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57743 --- Comment #2 from Phil Miller --- I just went to look at this in more detail, and I'm not sure how to interpret what I've found. If the DR in question in 225 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#225), following from 197,

[Bug c++/57743] Code accepted by other recent compilers, but not by g++ - possibly failure to activate ADL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57743 --- Comment #3 from Phil Miller --- The latest release of Microsoft Visual C++ (per the version available at http://rise4fun.com/Vcpp) now accepts this code without complaint. Cray compilers version 8.2 and onwards also accept this code. As of

[Bug c++/66439] New: Diagnostic on failed function template lookup is missing a line

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: unmobile at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 35705 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35705&action=edit Test input When compiling the attach

[Bug c++/66440] New: Diagnostic on "'foo' was not declared in this scope" offers an invalid suggestion

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: unmobile at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 35706 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35706&action=edi

[Bug c++/66439] Diagnostic on failed function template lookup is missing a line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66439 --- Comment #1 from Phil Miller --- Note that clang (from at least 3.5, possibly earlier) gets this right: > $ clang++-3.5 -c adltest.cpp > adltest.cpp:11:3: error: no matching function for call to 'f' > C::f<3>(b); //ill-formed; argument de

[Bug libstdc++/115269] New: Hardcoded links in 14.1 docs to pages from release 4.3.2

Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: unmobile at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- A couple spots in the current-version documentation seem to spuriously point to pages specifically from release version 4.3.2: https