[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2008-11-13 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #29 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-13 23:30 --- Subject: Bug 28102 Author: tschwinge Date: Thu Nov 13 23:28:46 2008 New Revision: 141838 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141838 Log: 2008-11-13 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAI

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2008-11-13 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2008-11-13 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #30 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-13 23:42 --- I have fixed this on the GCC trunk. Installing this fix on the 4.2 and 4.3 branches would be very difficult I was told, so we're going to abstain from even trying and are happy with a functional GCC trunk

[Bug driver/21706] MAXPATHLEN usage in [gcc]/gcc/tlink.c

2008-11-20 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-20 13:26 --- Fixed on trunk as rev142043. -- tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/38827] New: gcj emitting incorrect code

2009-01-13 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 Component: java AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38827

[Bug target/43469] [4.5 Regression] ICE trying to compile glibc for ARM thumb2

2010-03-23 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-23 14:14 --- Also got hit by this. -- tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/40521] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -g causes GCC to generate .eh_frame

2010-03-31 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #24 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 15:49 --- Regression report for arm-none-linux-gnueabi: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg01188.html> Patch: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg01505.html> -- tschwinge at gcc dot

[Bug target/43469] [4.5 Regression] ICE trying to compile glibc for ARM thumb2

2010-04-03 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-03 15:18 --- Confirmed. -- tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/42380] New: CFI statements vs. -pg

2009-12-15 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
roduct: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: arm-none-linux-gnueabi

[Bug debug/42380] CFI statements vs. -pg

2009-12-15 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 16:57 --- Richard Earnshaw wrote: > I'm not sure what other architectures do in this case. Do they also put > out adjustments to the cfi? I had a look at x86 and x86_64 -- they still need a frame pointer to

[Bug debug/42380] CFI statements vs. -pg

2009-12-16 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-16 09:58 --- As a tiny, years-old pointer: in <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01006.html>, Daniel J. suggested that ``appropriate dwarf2 frame gunk'' should be added. -- tschwinge at gcc

[Bug debug/42403] New: Incorrect CFI: doesn't readjust CFA after pop

2009-12-17 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: arm-none-linux-gnueabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42403

[Bug debug/42404] New: Incorrect CFI generated

2009-12-17 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
mponent: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: arm-none-linux-gnueabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42404

[Bug debug/42403] Incorrect CFI: doesn't readjust CFA after pop

2009-12-17 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-17 14:12 --- Last paragraph: .cfi_adjust_cfa_offset *-4*, of course. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42403

[Bug debug/42380] CFI statements vs. -pg

2010-01-06 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 17:57 --- This bug exists, by the way, not only when GCC is emitting CFI statements, but also when it's emitting .debug_frame directly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42380