[Bug lto/60981] New: lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc -> clang)

2014-04-27 Thread tony.theodore at gmail dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tony.theodore at gmail dot com Created attachment 32690 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32690&action=edit lto-plugin -static-libgcc config

[Bug lto/60981] lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc -> clang)

2014-04-27 Thread tony.theodore at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981 --- Comment #1 from Tony Theodore --- Created attachment 32691 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32691&action=edit add -static-libgcc to lto-plugin/configure This is the modified lto-plugin/configure that has been tested.

[Bug lto/60981] lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc -> clang)

2014-05-09 Thread tony.theodore at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981 Tony Theodore changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-w64-mingw32 Host|

[Bug lto/60981] lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc -> clang)

2014-05-13 Thread tony.theodore at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981 --- Comment #6 from Tony Theodore --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #4) > > --- Comment #3 from Tony Theodore --- > > I'm building a cross compiler with: > > It would have helped enormously if you'd stated so in the fi

[Bug lto/60981] lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc -> clang)

2014-05-15 Thread tony.theodore at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981 --- Comment #11 from Tony Theodore --- Thanks!