[Bug tree-optimization/69184] [6 Regression] ICE in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2685

2016-02-02 Thread ssaraswati at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69184 Sujoy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssaraswati at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/66062] under O2 optimization level , aarch64 compiler give informance : internal compiler error: in expand_assignment, at expr.c:4838

2015-07-27 Thread ssaraswati at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66062 Sujoy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssaraswati at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/66062] under O2 optimization level , aarch64 compiler give informance : internal compiler error: in expand_assignment, at expr.c:4838

2015-07-27 Thread ssaraswati at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66062 --- Comment #2 from Sujoy --- This bug is in UNCONFIRMED state. Since I am new to gcc, just wanted to know if one should work for this fix only after it is confirmed.

[Bug target/66062] under O2 optimization level , aarch64 compiler give informance : internal compiler error: in expand_assignment, at expr.c:4838

2015-07-28 Thread ssaraswati at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66062 --- Comment #4 from Sujoy --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3) > gcc-4.8 isn't supported anymore. > I cannot reproduce the issue with 4.9.3 or above. Thanks for checking. Yes, looks like this got fixed with PR65680.

[Bug tree-optimization/61441] ARM aarch64 fails to quiet signaling NaN

2015-08-10 Thread ssaraswati at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441 Sujoy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssaraswati at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug tree-optimization/61441] ARM aarch64 fails to quiet signaling NaN

2015-08-12 Thread ssaraswati at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441 --- Comment #4 from Sujoy --- Yes, I agree to your comment. With -fno-signaling-nans (which is the default), we need to fix the ccp so that the sNaN is converted to qNaN when the value is propagated. With -fsignaling-nans, we need to ensure tha

[Bug tree-optimization/61441] ARM aarch64 fails to quiet signaling NaN

2015-08-14 Thread ssaraswati at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441 --- Comment #6 from Sujoy --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5) > With -fno-signaling-nans we don't really care about the result value. I am not sure about this. -fno-signaling-nans is default and the original issue mentions

[Bug tree-optimization/61441] ARM aarch64 fails to quiet signaling NaN

2015-08-18 Thread ssaraswati at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441 --- Comment #8 from Sujoy --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #7) > With -fno-signaling-nans, signaling NaN representations are trap > representations - the compiler can assume that nothing ever manipulated as > a floating-po

[Bug tree-optimization/61441] ARM aarch64 fails to quiet signaling NaN

2015-08-20 Thread ssaraswati at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61441 --- Comment #10 from Sujoy --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #9) > There is no need to wait for bugs to move state (rather, if working on a > bug, you may wish to change it to ASSIGNED yourself with yourself as > assignee).