[Bug fortran/37472] bad output on default-format write of double in common block with -m64 flag i

2008-12-22 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #17 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2008-12-22 20:37 --- After all the updates committed for this bug, I thought I'd try the latest, including updating to ggmp-4.2.4 and mpfr-2.3.2. Here's the result for the GCC 4.3.2 release and the latest GCC. Note that the 32

[Bug c++/38705] New: ICE: canonical types differ for identical types const int and const AlpsNodeIndex_t

2009-01-02 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sdirkse at gams dot com GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38705

[Bug c++/38705] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types const int and const AlpsNodeIndex_t

2009-01-02 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #1 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2009-01-02 16:49 --- Created an attachment (id=17023) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17023&action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38705

[Bug fortran/30887] %VAL only accepts default-kind integer/real/complex

2007-02-22 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #3 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2007-02-22 18:52 --- I took out the restriction in resolve.c that leads to the error message, and it does give me a clean compile, but the code does not do what I expect. For example, passing a real(kind=8) by-value to C doesn't get me a

[Bug fortran/30887] %VAL only accepts default-kind integer/real/complex

2007-02-22 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #6 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2007-02-22 21:35 --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > > Enough facts, now for some ignorant speculation: I suppose there is some > > logic > > missing to pass a value from the caller when t

[Bug c/31075] New: 2's complement arithmetic (LLONG_MIN-1) works differently with and without optimization

2007-03-07 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sdirkse at gams dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31075

[Bug c/31075] 2's complement arithmetic (LLONG_MIN-1) works differently with and without optimization

2007-03-07 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #2 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2007-03-07 22:52 --- Thanks for telling me about the -fwrapv flag, that's good to know - I should have double-checked my K&R 2nd Edition before sending the bug. But I tried running the above example with the addition of the -fwrapv

[Bug c/31075] 2's complement arithmetic (LLONG_MIN-1) works differently with and without optimization

2007-03-07 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #4 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2007-03-07 23:10 --- DOH! I wasn't running the executable compiled with -fwrapv. Using the -fwrapv flag does indeed make things work as I hoped and as documented. -- sdirkse at gams dot com changed: What|Re

[Bug c/31085] New: internal compiler error: in create_mem_ref, at tree-ssa-address.c:606

2007-03-08 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
ReportedBy: sdirkse at gams dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31085

[Bug c/31085] internal compiler error: in create_mem_ref, at tree-ssa-address.c:606

2007-03-08 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #1 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2007-03-08 14:39 --- Created an attachment (id=13172) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13172&action=view) result of "gcc-save-temps" run on .c file To reproduce the bug with this file, do: mamie$gcc -v -D

[Bug c/31394] New: cos() returns wrong value unless -O0 is used

2007-03-29 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
D Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sdirkse at gams dot com GCC build triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.10 GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.10 GCC target triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.10 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31394

[Bug c/31394] cos() returns wrong value unless -O0 is used

2007-03-29 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #1 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2007-03-29 17:55 --- Created an attachment (id=13297) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13297&action=view) test case for the bug Building with gcc -m64 -O1 -o xxx cosbug.i -lm shows the bug bug gcc -m64 -o xxx cosbu

[Bug target/31394] cos() returns wrong value unless -O0 is used

2007-03-30 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #3 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2007-03-30 21:36 --- I installed gcc 20070329 and the problem I was having is solved. I suppose that makes it a duplicate of PR30980. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31394

[Bug bootstrap/32959] New: msgfmt fails on file libcpp/po/fr.po

2007-08-01 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sdirkse at gams dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32959

[Bug fortran/37472] New: bad output on default-format write of double in common block with -m64 flag i

2008-09-10 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
y: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sdirkse at gams dot com GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.10 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37472

[Bug fortran/37472] bad output on default-format write of double in common block with -m64 flag i

2008-09-10 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #1 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2008-09-11 00:56 --- Created an attachment (id=16289) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16289&action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37472

[Bug translation/32959] msgfmt fails on file libcpp/po/fr.po

2008-02-01 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #2 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2008-02-01 18:24 --- I tried a more recent GCC checkout of the trunk and I no longer have this issue, even with the old gettext. If this reoccurs I'll try updating gettext. Thanks, and please feel free to close this issue report. Or s

[Bug fortran/34722] New: compile results in "internal compiler error: segmentation fault" message

2008-01-08 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
ge Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sdirkse at gams dot com GCC target triplet: x86_64-unk

[Bug fortran/34722] compile results in "internal compiler error: segmentation fault" message

2008-01-08 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #1 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2008-01-09 01:11 --- Created an attachment (id=14906) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14906&action=view) zipped source and doit.sh script to reproduce To reproduce, unzip the attachment and run ./doit.sh --

[Bug fortran/34722] compile results in "internal compiler error: segmentation fault" message

2008-01-08 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #2 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2008-01-09 01:16 --- I should have mentioned: I get this with a checkout of the gcc trunk from 8 Jan 2008. Also, this is not likely unique to 64-bit: I get the same error message on Linux32 with a similar file and a slightly older revision of

[Bug fortran/36751] New: assignment between allocatable arrays of different size causes glibc error

2008-07-07 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
causes glibc error Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sdirkse at gams dot com GCC host triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux

[Bug fortran/36751] assignment between allocatable arrays of different size causes glibc error

2008-07-07 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #1 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2008-07-07 18:00 --- Created an attachment (id=15872) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15872&action=view) test case No flags required to reproduce: gfortran -o repro repro.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug c++/36826] New: ICE in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:2528

2008-07-14 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
o: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sdirkse at gams dot com GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36826

[Bug middle-end/36826] ICE in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:2528

2008-07-14 Thread sdirkse at gams dot com
--- Comment #1 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2008-07-14 20:18 --- Created an attachment (id=15907) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15907&action=view) zipped, pre-processed source to turf up the bug I couldn't generate the .i file using -save-temps,