: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com
Created attachment 31081
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31081&action=edit
Minimal working example for associate bug (?)
Hello. I was not able to find a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58852
Sarantis Pantazis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com
I wanted to check the difference in CPU time in the calculation of a sum when
the terms are included in the same expression and when they are added
separately. For this reason I wrote the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168
--- Comment #1 from Sarantis Pantazis ---
Created attachment 31234
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31234&action=edit
Bug code
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com
I have some problems with inheritance.
In particular, I can not allocate an allocatable class variable to a child type
(the extra components are not recognized by the compiler).
Attached is a minimal working
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59525
--- Comment #1 from Sarantis Pantazis ---
Created attachment 31446
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31446&action=edit
Minimal working example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #8 from Sarantis Pantazis ---
Created attachment 32430
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32430&action=edit
Compilation logs and installation workflow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #9 from Sarantis Pantazis ---
Thank you for the fast response and effort. I have installed gcc from svn but
the results are still the same. Perhaps I mis-installed something? Attached you
will find the logs and the installation workflo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #11 from Sarantis Pantazis ---
Yes, I did; I used "make clean" first (also "rm *.o *.f90 *.s" in the main
folder to clean up the files generated by -save-temps).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #13 from Sarantis Pantazis ---
> Did you update the compiler name in your makefile?
I have left the line COMPILER=gfortran at the top as it is and I have defined
an alias in my ~/.bashrc for gfortran pointing to the newly installed lo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543
--- Comment #15 from Sarantis Pantazis ---
> Did you install the compiler (i.e. run 'make install')?
Yes, I did. I read http://gcc.gnu.org/install/index.html and made a summary of
the steps I followed (attached here). I also kept a log of "make"
ity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com
I am not sure if this is a bug or the way it is supposed to work, but I could
not find anything relative online. I have written the foll
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com
Created attachment 32365
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32365&action=edit
code and compiled files
The attach
13 matches
Mail list logo