https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22195
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37998
--- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Thu Nov 10 23:56:30 2016
New Revision: 242062
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242062&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-10 Sandra Loosemore
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37998
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60179
--- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Wed May 21 14:45:36 2014
New Revision: 210714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-21 Cesar Philippidis
Sandra L
IRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 35410
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35410&action=e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
--- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Apr 28 02:40:56 2015
New Revision: 222497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-04-27 Sandra Loosemore
PR libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
Build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
I am seeing this failure on the GCC
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36651
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36651&action=edit
cwsc1.s
The testcase gcc.dg/cwsc1.c seems to assume that register "i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61124
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65482
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65129
--- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Nov 17 01:19:59 2015
New Revision: 230451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-16 Sandra Loosemore
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65129
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56036
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Nov 17 01:56:17 2015
New Revision: 230452
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230452&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-16 Thomas Preud'homme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56036
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53587
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56036
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Nov 17 18:06:01 2015
New Revision: 230467
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-17 Sandra Loosemore
PR targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53587
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48568
--- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Nov 17 21:07:15 2015
New Revision: 230498
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230498&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-17 Sandra Loosemore
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48568
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48254
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46218
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42270
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68410
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68341
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68410
--- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Wed Nov 18 19:45:47 2015
New Revision: 230563
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230563&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-18 Sandra Loosemore
PR targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68410
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59710
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Fri Jan 16 00:43:24 2015
New Revision: 219700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-15 Sandra Loosemore
PR target/59710
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59710
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libitm
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I found this issue while checking for undocumented attributes in connection
with PR 1078.
These attributes defined in c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Sat Jan 2 03:45:32 2016
New Revision: 232034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-01 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #9 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
"no_stack_limit" is documented now.
I've proposed deleting "com_interface", as it's been obsolete since 2001:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg0001
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00935.html
added a new
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I have been reviewing undocumented target-specific attributes for PR 1078, and
spotted that the mcore backend defines "dllimport
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In reviewing the current state of PR1078, I found that there is no
documentation for the H8/3000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #10 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Jan 5 18:04:01 2016
New Revision: 232081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232081&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-05 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Jan 5 19:45:43 2016
New Revision: 232085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-05 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #12 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Jan 5 20:51:48 2016
New Revision: 232092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-05 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
D
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
config/darwin.c defines attributes "apple_kext_compatibility" and "weak_import"
which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62273
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #13 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Thu Jan 7 18:02:25 2016
New Revision: 232136
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232136&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-07 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #14 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've finished going through the target-specific attributes. I filed new
target-specific issues for things that need attention from target maintainers:
PR 69151: h8300 "OS_Task"
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
When I was trying to puzzle out the meaning of a spec string using the %n
escape, I noticed that the documentation of spec file syntax in the GCC manual
does not describe that syntax
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
While looking at something else, I noticed that install.texi seems to be
majorly bit-rotten, with many references to ancient versions of GCC. It even
says the instructions are for "the cu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97683
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm pretty sure this is a gas bug. I used git bisect to track it down to
binutils commit ae9d2233e61a98ff8dba56be10219aa5306ffc9a which caused gcc to
start passing --gdwarf-5 on the gas co
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
While working on something else, I observed that gfortran doesn't implement the
coshape intrinsic -- it's treated like a regular call to an undeclared
function, and a qui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93308
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, there are two flavors of failures being diagnosed by the test case.
The first flavor involves the lower bounds of an array passed into a bind(c)
procedure being set to zero in the callee when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94289
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93524
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93524
--- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Now applied to GCC 11 too. The other two patches referenced in this issue were
put on mainline before GCC 11 branched and not on GCC 10 or any older branch,
so I think I'm done here and the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917
--- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here's a related problem: the GFC descriptor representation can't distinguish
between
CHARACTER(kind=ucs4, len=1)
and
CHARACTER(kind=c_char, len=4)
because all it has is elem_len == 4.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 54268
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54268&action=edit
WIP patch
While working on some other changes to the "omp for" dir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94920
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Test case is derived from c-c++-common/gomp/loop-8.c, with "simd" added:
void
foo (void)
{
int a[1024];
int *p, *q;
#pragma omp parallel for simd collapse(2)
f
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This is similar to PR106449; adding the simd keyword to an existing omp for
test case causes an ICE related to incompatible types.
Test case is derived from g++.dg/gomp/pr95063.C:
// PR
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Test case is reduced from libgomp.c/linear-1.c, with "simd" added to the loop:
int a[256];
__attribute__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I thought I had a fix for this that involved making gfc_is_simply_contiguous
smarter about intrinsics and other function calls, but after writing more test
cases I found that this one still ICEs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
--- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52107
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52107&action=edit
-fdump-tree-original output from second test case
Well, this is nuts. Unmodified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
--- Comment #6 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057249.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
--- Comment #9 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Without a test case, I can't tell if the error in comment 7 was due to this bug
or a different one. It doesn't really look the same as the other failures I
looked at in this issue, as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is probably related to my rewrite of the size/shape/ubound/lbound
intrinsics back in mid-November. I can add this one to my queue, but I've
already got 3 or 4 other issues already wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103258
--- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The previous hacky patch had some testsuite regressions. I've posted a less
hacky one that doesn't trigger new failures here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/587632.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103258
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95879
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103366
--- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The proposed patch looks reasonable to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102708
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sandra at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898
--- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057293.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103695
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103695
--- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It appears that the wrong-scope problem is introduced in gfc_finish_var_decl,
in this block of code:
/* Chain this decl to the pending declarations. Don't do pushdecl()
because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103695
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ooops, I meant AFFINITY clause in the message above, not ASSOCIATED.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104100
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103695
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sandra at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102621
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103695
--- Comment #6 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 102621 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103695
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98342
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sandra at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101337
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sandra at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89078
Bug 89078 depends on bug 35276, which changed state.
Bug 35276 Summary: Doc should described how to compile mixed-language programs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89078
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I did look over the entire list of still-open issues and did not see any
further low-hanging fruit. It also seemed to me that some of the issues on the
list are cases where it appears the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101337
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
stack_limit_rtx is initialized in init_emit_once() before
init_reg_modes_target() is called to fill in the table for hard_regno_nregs.
For -fstack-limit-register, this means the REG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101674
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92879
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103166
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103258
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91288
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
201 - 300 of 498 matches
Mail list logo
