[Bug gcov-profile/94029] [9 Regression] gcc crash in coverage.c:655 since r9-4216-g390e529e2b98983d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/93946] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gcov-profile/94029] [9 Regression] gcc crash in coverage.c:655 since r9-4216-g390e529e2b98983d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94029 --- Comment #18 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm seeing the missing gcov file on nios2-linux-gnu as well. Git revision 6e00d8dcf32ace6588a1a4843dfcc0e8b9f9d00f. I took another look at the testcase. I haven't used gcov f

[Bug tree-optimization/93946] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946 --- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- RTL before sched2 does look sane and similar to that generated for x86 with -m32. I've been trying to step through sched2. I think that where things get interesting is the ca

[Bug tree-optimization/93946] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946 --- Comment #13 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, no. The problem is that the scheduler is moving ldw r2, 0(r4) ahead of stw zero, 0(r5) which is incorrect because the pointers in r4 and r5 are aliases. So at

[Bug tree-optimization/93946] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946 --- Comment #15 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmmm. I've gone over this code 2 or 3 times now, and I'm still convinced the problem is in the alias analysis, not the scheduler. I've stepped deeper into the code in the debugg

[Bug tree-optimization/93946] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946 --- Comment #18 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmmm, it looks to me like things are going wrong in the tree fre1 pass too. I commented out the redundant zero store in the test case to see what would happen, like long __attribute__((noipa

[Bug tree-optimization/93946] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946 --- Comment #22 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- My nios2-elf test results look good now with this patch. Thanks!

[Bug target/93847] Nios II ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93847 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug analyzer/96395] New: gcc.dg/analyzer/explode-2.c fails when compiled as C++

Component: analyzer Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- gcc.dg/analyzer/explode-2.c triggers a -Wanalyzer-too-complex diagnostic when compiled as C++, but not as C: $ x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ /path/to/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg

[Bug analyzer/96395] gcc.dg/analyzer/explode-2.c fails when compiled as C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96395 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/96487] New: cddce1 optimizer depends on order of basic blocks

: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 49007 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49007&action=edit c and c++ dump files If the test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ss

[Bug c/97125] [11 Regression] new problem with -Wduplicated-branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97125 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/97125] [11 Regression] new problem with -Wduplicated-branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97125 --- Comment #6 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yeah, that looks like an easy fix. Thanks for tracking it down.

[Bug other/92435] New: % format codes for diagnostics are not documented in the GCC internals manual

: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- There's a little bit of high-level guidance about compiler diagnostics in the "User Experience Guidelines"

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- As I suspected, MIPS has exactly the same bug. It generates GP-relative addressing in get_flexible and get_flexible_nonzero, and puts flexible_nonzero in .sdata instead of .data. This isn&#

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 47233 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47233&action=edit buggy MIPS output for test case

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmmm, the plot thickens. The comment on int_size_in_bytes in tree.c says: /* Return the size of TYPE (in bytes) as a wide integer or return -1 if the size can vary or

[Bug rtl-optimization/951] Documentation of compiler passes and sources very out of date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=951 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Richard Sandiford complained that my patch to not put objects containing flexible arrays in small data was an ABI change for references across compilation units, so I've been taking another

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #6 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 47346 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47346&action=edit improved test case with global/external cases as well as local

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 47347 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47347&action=edit nios2 output for improved test case, -O2 -mgpopt=global

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 47348 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47348&action=edit mips output for improved test case, -O2

[Bug testsuite/92622] FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-22.c on ILP32: missing warnings for VLA on lines 67 and 69

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92622 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #9 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Dec 2 03:52:15 2019 New Revision: 278891 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278891&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-12-01 Sandra Loosemore Fix bugs rel

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #10 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Dec 3 02:44:41 2019 New Revision: 278919 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278919&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-12-02 Sandra Loosemore Fix bugs rel

[Bug target/92499] nios2 backend needs to consider allocated object size, not C object size for gprel optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92499 --- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've committed a patch to fix this for nios2 only to mainline and the GCC 9 branch. I did consider an alternate 1-line fix to target-independent code: Index: gcc/var

[Bug analyzer/93316] Several gcc.dg/analyzer tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93316 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/88999] [9/10 Regression] testcases using in_avail() fail on nios2-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88999 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've been taking another look at this issue. It looks like the trouble is that the "checking for S_ISREG or S_IFREG" test in the configure script is failing because it tries t

[Bug libstdc++/88999] [9/10 Regression] testcases using in_avail() fail on nios2-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88999 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- This may be the same as PR 79193. I'll check and see whether the patch attached to that issue fixes it.

[Bug libstdc++/88999] [9/10 Regression] testcases using in_avail() fail on nios2-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88999 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libstdc++/79193] libstdc++ configure incorrectly decides linking works for cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79193 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 88999 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/88284] nios2: pessimistic ldw-to-stwio scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88284 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/90690] Undocumented -Werror-implicit-function-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90690 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/90467] Documentation: many warning options that are enabled by default are documented in the -Woption form, not -Wno-option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90467 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/53633] __attribute__((naked)) should disable -Wreturn-type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53633 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-25 18:08:11 UTC --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Jul 25 18:08:06 2012 New Revision: 189860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189860 Log: 2012-07-25 Sandra L

[Bug rtl-optimization/50380] cc1 hangs eating 100% CPU

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50380 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-19 20:29:27 UTC --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Dec 19 20:29:21 2011 New Revision: 182498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182498 Log: 2011-12-19 Sandra L

[Bug bootstrap/59447] --with-dwarf2 should be documented as meaning "DWARF 2 or later" instead of just "DWARF 2"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59447 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 --- Comment #10 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch was posted here. I'd like some review on methodology for the mechanically-generated parts before checking in the whole mess. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg01732.html

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 --- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Jan 9 21:37:45 2019 New Revision: 267783 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267783&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-01-09 Sandra Loosemore PR other/16

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 --- Comment #12 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Jan 9 21:39:49 2019 New Revision: 267784 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267784&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-01-09 Sandra Loosemore PR other/16

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 --- Comment #13 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Jan 9 21:41:36 2019 New Revision: 267785 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267785&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-01-09 Sandra Loosemore PR other/16

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 --- Comment #14 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Jan 9 21:44:56 2019 New Revision: 267786 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267786&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-01-09 Sandra Loosemore PR other/16

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 --- Comment #15 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Jan 9 21:46:45 2019 New Revision: 267787 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267787&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-01-09 Sandra Loosemore PR other/16

[Bug other/16615] throughout gcc docu and code numerous "can not"'s appear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16615 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libstdc++/86756] Don't define __cpp_lib_filesystem unless --enable-libstdcxx-filesystem-ts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86756 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/88999] New: [9 Regression] testcases using in_avail() fail on nios2-elf

Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I'm seeing some libstdc++ test regressions on nios2-elf testing on mainline. The symptoms are assertion failures about the resul

[Bug libstdc++/89023] New: libstdc++ test failure; can't find omp.h with --disable-libgomp

ormal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- On nios2-elf, I'm seeing FAIL: 28_regex/headers/regex/parallel_mode.cc (test for excess errors) Specifically: In file inc

[Bug middle-end/83889] [8 regression] new failures on some arm targets after r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83889 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Wed Sep 11 20:53:46 2019 New Revision: 275667 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275667&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-11 Sandra Loosemore PR testsui

[Bug middle-end/83889] [8 regression] new failures on some arm targets after r256644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83889 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sat Sep 14 19:00:15 2019 New Revision: 275718 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275718&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-14 Sandra Loosemore PR testsui

[Bug middle-end/26241] [7/8/9/10 Regression] None of the IPA passes are documented in passes.texi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241 --- Comment #20 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Oct 10 19:44:26 2019 New Revision: 276851 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276851&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-10 Xiong Hu Luo Sandra L

[Bug c/80409] Document that va_arg(ap, void*) can be used to consume any pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80409 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Feb 26 02:33:26 2019 New Revision: 269203 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269203&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-25 Sandra Loosemore PR

[Bug c/80409] Document that va_arg(ap, void*) can be used to consume any pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80409 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug demangler/79111] demangle_template tries to allocate 18446744070799748648 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79111 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/89817] New: remove references to type modes from user docs for vector extensions

Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The existing user documentation for vector extensions (including the type and variable attributes and not just the Vector Extensions

[Bug middle-end/82063] issues with arguments enabled by -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82063 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/78179] FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78179 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/61024] nios2-rtems4.11 build of 4.9.0 fails on FreeBSD 10 c++ (clang).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61024 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/85716] No easy way for end-user to tell what GCC is doing when compilation is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85716 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/59784] Nios2: Wrong code generation for fextsd custom instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59784 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/62130] ld.exe: nios2_work.elf: Not enough room for program headers, try linking with -N

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62130 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/80024] nios2: unclear wording "numeric digits" in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80024 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sat Oct 27 21:34:43 2018 New Revision: 265561 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265561&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-10-27 Sandra Loosemore PR targ

[Bug target/80024] nios2: unclear wording "numeric digits" in diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80024 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/85035] nios2: adding -fdelete-null-pointer-checks with -O2 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85035 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/85035] nios2: adding -fdelete-null-pointer-checks with -O2 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85035 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44912 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44912&action=edit assembly language output

[Bug tree-optimization/86965] nios2 optimizer forgets about known upper bits of register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86965 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/86975] wrong peephole optimization applied on nios2 and mips targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86975 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/86965] nios2 optimizer forgets about known upper bits of register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86965 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also see PR86975, which is specifically about that negative constant operand to the AND expression being generated by the range optimizer.

[Bug target/85035] nios2: adding -fdelete-null-pointer-checks with -O2 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85035 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/87079] nios2 optimization for size - case of regression relatively to 5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87079 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug target/87079] nios2 optimization for size - case of regression relatively to 5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87079 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sat Nov 3 18:12:44 2018 New Revision: 265770 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265770&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-03 Sandra Loosemore PR targ

[Bug target/87079] nios2 optimization for size - case of regression relatively to 5.3.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87079 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/78357] nios2 uses non-standard atomic functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug driver/80828] Command line option -e not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80828 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 8 01:26:28 2018 New Revision: 265903 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265903&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-07 Sandra Loosemore PR driv

[Bug driver/80828] Command line option -e not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80828 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug middle-end/42726] -fno-common documentation inaccuracy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42726 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 8 03:37:32 2018 New Revision: 265906 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265906&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-07 Sandra Loosemore PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/42726] -fno-common documentation inaccuracy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42726 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug sanitizer/81902] new -fsanitize=pointer-overflow option undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81902 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC

[Bug sanitizer/80998] Implement -fsanitize=pointer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998 Bug 80998 depends on bug 81902, which changed state. Bug 81902 Summary: new -fsanitize=pointer-overflow option undocumented https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81902 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/54615] unclear documentation on -fomit-frame-pointer for -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54615 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug middle-end/51019] unclear documentation on -fomit-frame-pointer default for -Os and different platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51019 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c++/43105] Document restrictions on mixing -fno-rtti and -frtti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43105 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/36572] Documentation for some options starting with “no-” not clear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36572 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 8 22:02:38 2018 New Revision: 265939 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265939&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-08 Sandra Loosemore PR oth

[Bug other/36572] Documentation for some options starting with “no-” not clear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36572 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug driver/41179] Documentation for "-fno-toplevel-reorder" is confusing (and wrong)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41179 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Fri Nov 9 20:45:06 2018 New Revision: 265993 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265993&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-09 Sandra Loosemore PR driv

[Bug middle-end/65703] -fdefer-pop documentation is confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65703 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Fri Nov 9 20:45:06 2018 New Revision: 265993 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265993&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-09 Sandra Loosemore PR driv

[Bug middle-end/65703] -fdefer-pop documentation is confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65703 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug driver/41179] Documentation for "-fno-toplevel-reorder" is confusing (and wrong)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41179 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug middle-end/65703] -fdefer-pop documentation is confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65703 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sun Nov 11 01:33:53 2018 New Revision: 266008 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266008&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-10 Sandra Loosemore PR middle-e

[Bug middle-end/65703] -fdefer-pop documentation is confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65703 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c/26366] __builtin_expect needs better documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26366 --- Comment #6 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sun Nov 11 18:39:10 2018 New Revision: 266017 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266017&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-11 Sandra Loosemore PR

[Bug c/26366] __builtin_expect needs better documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26366 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug other/38768] -fschedule-insns documentation is wrong for x86 and some other targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38768 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c++/43105] Document restrictions on mixing -fno-rtti and -frtti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43105 --- Comment #6 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Sun Nov 11 22:46:00 2018 New Revision: 266020 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266020&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-11 Sandra Loosemore PR c

[Bug c++/43105] Document restrictions on mixing -fno-rtti and -frtti

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43105 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug web/79738] Documentation for __attribute__((const)) slightly misleading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79738 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/61588] Optimization defaults are not what documentation say they should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61588 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug c/69502] attribute aligned reduces alignment contrary to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69502 --- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Nov 12 06:23:16 2018 New Revision: 266025 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266025&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-11 Sandra Loosemore PR

[Bug c/69502] attribute aligned reduces alignment contrary to documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69502 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

  1   2   3   4   5   >