: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: russelldub at gmail dot com
Created attachment 32558
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32558&action=edit
Code to reproduc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780
--- Comment #1 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
> Equivalence statements in equivalence statements
Should read "Equivalence statements in modules". Apologies.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780
--- Comment #8 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
> May be the patch should be submitted to fort...@gcc.gnu.org (for next stage1).
I'd be happy if this could be resolved. Should I submit or someone with more
clout among the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
--- Comment #18 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33703
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33703&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix module equivalence duplicates
Here is a proposed fix for the
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: russelldub at gmail dot com
Consider the following "cray_ptr_issue1.f90":
MODULE PTR_MOD
IMPLICIT NONE
REAL :: ptee1(*)
POINTER (ptr1, ptee1)
END MODULE PTR_MOD
PROGRAM MAIN
USE PTR_MOD
IMPLICIT NO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529
--- Comment #2 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> (In reply to russelldub from comment #0)
> > Consider the following "cray_ptr_issue1.f90":
> >
> > MODULE PTR_MOD
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529
--- Comment #4 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
> With ifort, are you compiling with whatever flag enforces
> standards conformance. I need to go hunting through the
> standard to see if assumed size arrays are allowed in the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529
--- Comment #5 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
> With ifort, are you compiling with whatever flag enforces
> standards conformance. I need to go hunting through the
> standard to see if assumed size arrays are allowed in the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529
--- Comment #7 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> AFAICT the ICE with "REAL :: ptee1(10)" has been fixed for gfortran 4.9.1
> and above (also for 4.8.4).
I can't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529
--- Comment #8 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
Not sure what correct etiquette is for checking on bug status, but this has
been sitting for close to two months now, so I thought I would poke my head in
again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529
--- Comment #11 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
> > Nasty answer: what did you do to fix it?
> >
> > I RTFM and saw at
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Cray-pointers.html#Cray-pointers
>
> Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780
--- Comment #3 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
Any hope for movement on this? I've made some attempts at diagnosing the
issue, but not sure why equivalences behave differently than other statements
in the modules.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780
--- Comment #4 from russelldub at gmail dot com ---
Any hope for movement on this? I've made some attempts at diagnosing the
issue, but not sure why equivalences behave differently than other statements
in the modules.
13 matches
Mail list logo