[Bug middle-end/58245] -fstack-protector[-all] does not protect functions that call noreturn functions

2013-08-28 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58245 Rose Garcia changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rose.garcia-eggl2fk@yopmail

[Bug bootstrap/58427] New: xgcc target compilation depends on installed libgcc_s.so

2013-09-15 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com during target compilation (for example libssp or libstdc++) xgcc is invoked with the usual specs: /src/build/gcc454/gcc-4.5.4/host-x86_64-unknown-linux

[Bug bootstrap/58427] xgcc target compilation depends on installed libgcc_s.so

2013-09-15 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58427 --- Comment #1 from Rose Garcia --- related binutils bugreport: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12549#c18

[Bug bootstrap/59447] New: --with-dwarf2 is not propagated correctly, will always create dwarf4 by default

2013-12-10 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com even if one manages that --with-dwarf2 gets properly redirected to gcc/configure from the toplevel configure script ( i used

[Bug bootstrap/61388] New: [4.8.3 Regression] linux/microblaze fails to build: undefined machine-specific constraint at this point: "Q"

2014-06-02 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
ion: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com build/genopinit ../../gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.m

[Bug bootstrap/61388] [4.8.3 Regression] linux/microblaze fails to build: undefined machine-specific constraint at this point: "Q"

2014-06-02 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61388 --- Comment #1 from Rose Garcia --- tried adding the author of the faulty/incomplete patch that caused the regression: nagaraju.mek...@xilinx.com to the CC list but i'm apparently not allowed to. could someone with op powers please do so ?

[Bug lto/61487] New: LTO breaks on mips with wireless-tools 0.29

2014-06-12 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Jean_Tourrilhes/Linux/wireless_tools.29.tar.gz (no dependencies, so easy to test) when built with a gcc 4.8.3 linux crosscompiler plus -flto, i get: mips

[Bug lto/61487] LTO breaks on mips with wireless-tools 0.29

2014-06-12 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61487 --- Comment #1 from Rose Garcia --- i forgot to add that the same works fine with exactly the same toolchain built for armv7l.

[Bug lto/61487] LTO breaks on mips with wireless-tools 0.29

2014-06-12 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61487 --- Comment #2 from Rose Garcia --- maybe related (fails also only on mips with -flto) libpcap 1.3.0 (compiled WITH -fPIC) http://www.tcpdump.org/release/libpcap-1.3.0.tar.gz mips-linux-musl-gcc -L/media/3T/x-prefix/mips/lib -isystem /media/3T/x

[Bug lto/61487] LTO breaks on mips with wireless-tools 0.29

2014-06-13 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61487 --- Comment #4 from Rose Garcia --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > What mips target triplet exactly? mips-linux-musl (using the patches/buildscripts from https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross, as musl support has still not be

[Bug bootstrap/61388] [4.8 Regression] linux/microblaze fails to build: undefined machine-specific constraint at this point: "Q"

2014-06-17 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61388 --- Comment #5 from Rose Garcia --- (In reply to Michael Eager from comment #3) > What sources are you building? GCC 4.8.3 release tarball, as already mentioned. > > When I build --target=microblaze-xilinx-elf from the current sources, I see

[Bug bootstrap/61388] [4.8 Regression] linux/microblaze fails to build: undefined machine-specific constraint at this point: "Q"

2014-06-17 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61388 --- Comment #6 from Rose Garcia --- (In reply to Nagaraju Mekala from comment #4) > I have checked it with 4.9.0 and it is working fine for me. we're not talking gcc 4.9.0 here. this is about gcc 4.8.3 release. please test that version.

[Bug bootstrap/61388] [4.8 Regression] linux/microblaze fails to build: undefined machine-specific constraint at this point: "Q"

2014-06-17 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61388 --- Comment #7 from Rose Garcia --- (In reply to Rose Garcia from comment #5) > (In reply to Michael Eager from comment #3) > > What sources are you building? > > GCC 4.8.3 release tarball, as already mentioned. > actually i didnt mention it

[Bug c/53119] -Wmissing-braces wrongly warns about universal zero initializer {0}

2014-08-03 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119 Rose Garcia changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rose.garcia-eggl2fk@yopmail

[Bug c/53119] -Wmissing-braces wrongly warns about universal zero initializer {0}

2014-08-03 Thread rose.garcia-eggl2fk at yopmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119 --- Comment #18 from Rose Garcia --- Created attachment 33229 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33229&action=edit backported fix for gcc 4.8.3 oh, is that so? that's unfortunate, as gcc > 4.7 requires a C++ compiler to bootstr