--- Comment #5 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-05-11 15:56
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] -fsection-anchors breaks Ada
"dje at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like something in exception handling is creating a new object
--- Comment #7 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-05-11 16:18
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] -fsection-anchors breaks Ada
Thanks Andreas. I might be barking up the wrong tree here, but it seems
odd to me is that output_ttype is using expand_normal () to expand this
tree
--- Comment #9 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-06-06 15:02
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize
-maltivec
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about instead of absolute numbers doin
--- Comment #11 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-06-06 15:16
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize
-maltivec
"dje at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The auto-vectorizer is a Tree-SSA pass. The
--- Comment #14 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-06-06 15:53
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize
-maltivec
"dje at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're performing the auto-vectorizatio
--- Comment #18 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-07-02 13:39
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] wrong code in spec tests for -ftree-vectorize
-maltivec
"hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Increasing alignment of static v
--- Comment #25 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-07-12 06:32
---
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1.1 build fails on mips-sgi-irix6.5 (libstdc++)/GCC 4.1.0
worked.
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks Rainer and Eric. Then, since we have a work
--- Comment #5 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-07-24 06:03
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] Missing DImode float conversion functions with
-msoft-float
"echristo at apple dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I doubt we're going to backport
--- Comment #6 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-08-20 09:40
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: RTL check: expected
code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:956
"bonzini at gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #14 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-05 21:08
---
Subject: Re: internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at
config/mips/mips.c:5579
"ddaney at avtrex dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've not forced -EB because that
--- Comment #16 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-05 21:22
---
Subject: Re: internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at
config/mips/mips.c:5579
"ddaney at avtrex dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My concern was that the bug only occurs
--- Comment #18 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-05 21:44
---
Subject: Re: internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at
config/mips/mips.c:5579
"ddaney at avtrex dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> richard at codesourcery dot com wrote:
>
--- Comment #15 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-05-25 14:13
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] segfault in try_split on mips during bootstrap
David, msny thanks for looking at this.
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RS6000
--- Comment #3 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-20 12:56
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3
"daney at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't really like the patch that much though. It forces
--- Comment #19 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-27 14:37
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c
Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2007-06-23 Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> PR middle-e
--- Comment #11 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-30 12:19
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] function with asm() does not setup stack frame
"zadeck at naturalbridge dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you check to see if this bug is collater
--- Comment #21 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-30 12:26
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c
Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2007-06-23 K
--- Comment #12 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-30 12:58
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] function with asm() does not setup stack frame
"richard at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "zadeck at naturalbridge dot com&quo
--- Additional Comments From richard at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-07
17:07 ---
Subject: Re: Functions returning pointers with pointer argument
"tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't have the standard at hand, but both the Inte
--- Comment #7 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-10-22 08:51
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Bad code on MIPS with -fnon-call-exceptions
"daney at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard, does this look right?
Looks good to me.
--
--- Comment #6 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-11-23 05:04
---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] gcc generate incorrect alias symbols for PPC
"amodra at bigpond dot net dot au" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
21 matches
Mail list logo
