[Bug fortran/57297] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_4.f90 -O2 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 16 May 2013, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297 > > --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- > So far I have not attempted

[Bug tree-optimization/57303] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] struct miscompiled at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57303 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 20 May 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57303 > > --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- > I wonder if, in addition to fix

[Bug tree-optimization/57318] [4.9 Regression] optimizer takes several seconds on nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 21 May 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 > > --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- > (In reply to Richard Biener fro

[Bug tree-optimization/57318] [4.9 Regression] optimizer takes several seconds on nested loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318 > >--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- >> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199140&root=

[Bug target/57341] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux at -O3 in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57341 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57341 > >--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- >(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/57343] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux at -Os and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57343 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 24 May 2013, rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57343 > > --- Comment #7 from Zdenek Dvorak --- > (In reply to Richard Biener fro

[Bug tree-optimization/57417] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] hang on volatile int array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 27 May 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57417 > > --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > > It seems to me that t

[Bug tree-optimization/30604] Unable to coalesce ssa_names and which are marked as MUST COALESCE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604 --- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604 > > David Binderman changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/57586] ICE when expanding volatile asm using unaligned pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57586 > > --- Comment #4 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Create

[Bug tree-optimization/50955] [4.7 Regression] IVopts incorrectly rewrite the address of a global memory access into a local form.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50955 --- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50955 > > --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- > (In reply to Andrew Pinski

[Bug middle-end/57287] [4.9 Regression] Bogus uninitialized warning with abnormal control flow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57287 > > Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: > >W

[Bug c/58346] ICE with SIGFPE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting trunk, 4.8, 4.7, and 4.6)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58346 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58346 > > --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> --- &g

[Bug middle-end/57748] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE when expanding assignment to unaligned zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748 --- Comment #40 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748 > > --- Comment #38 from Bernd Edlinger --- > Richard, > >

[Bug middle-end/58463] ICE with -fdump-tree-all-all in vector indexed access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463 > > --- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos --- > Backporting fixes the problem. Can

[Bug middle-end/58463] ICE with -fdump-tree-all-all in vector indexed access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, pa...@matos-sorge.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463 > > --- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de fro

[Bug tree-optimization/49963] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in abs_hwi, at hwint.c:108

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-08-17 11:25:02 UTC --- On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49963 > > Paolo Carlini changed: > >

[Bug ada/50294] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50294 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-06 09:52:38 UTC --- On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50294 > > --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-09-06 &

[Bug fortran/36842] Fortran: Minimize heap allocation of temporary arrays by loop versioning in the frontend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36842 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-07 14:32:55 UTC --- On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36842 > > --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-09-07 >

[Bug tree-optimization/48092] associative property of builtins is not exploited on GIMPLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48092 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-08 10:50:46 UTC --- On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48092 > > --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente >

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #51 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-26 08:04:37 UTC --- On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, rearnsha at arm dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 > > --- Comment #48 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-09-12 &

[Bug c/50444] -ftree-isa ignores alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-27 08:52:06 UTC --- On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 > > H.J. Lu changed: > >W

[Bug tree-optimization/50480] 10% performance regression on Spec2006 410.bwaves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-27 08:57:33 UTC --- On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, kirill.yukhin at intel dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480 > > --- Comment #4 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-09-27

[Bug middle-end/50527] inconsistent vla align

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-27 09:28:42 UTC --- On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 > > --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09

[Bug middle-end/50527] inconsistent vla align

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-27 11:08:01 UTC --- On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50527 > > --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09

[Bug tree-optimization/49662] [4.7 Regression] XFAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-XX.c, PRE confuses loop interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49662 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-30 09:53:26 UTC --- On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49662 > > Rainer Orth changed: > >W

[Bug gcov-profile/45890] Coverage may be weakened by r164986

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45890 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 09:14:42 UTC --- On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, singhai at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45890 > > --- Comment #2 from Sharad Singhai 2011-10-01 &

[Bug gcov-profile/45890] Coverage may be weakened by r164986

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45890 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 09:50:55 UTC --- On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45890 > > --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-04 09:18:

[Bug c++/50594] Option -fwhole-program discards replaced new operator for std::string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 10:03:36 UTC --- On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50594 > > --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-04 &

[Bug gcov-profile/45890] Coverage may be weakened by r164986

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45890 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 10:18:18 UTC --- On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45890 > > --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-04 10:04:

[Bug tree-optimization/50596] Problems in vectorization of condition expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 11:26:51 UTC --- On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 > > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-04 >

[Bug tree-optimization/50596] Problems in vectorization of condition expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 11:28:18 UTC --- On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 > > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-04 >

[Bug middle-end/50609] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c compilation, -O2 -flto (ICE)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 15:50:37 UTC --- On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50609 > > --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-10-04 &

[Bug tree-optimization/49279] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Optimization incorrectly presuming constant variable inside loop in g++ 4.5 and 4.6 with -O2 and -O3 for x86_64 targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-05 09:40:58 UTC --- On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49279 > > --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-05 >

[Bug fortran/43829] Scalarization of reductions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #47 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-10 09:05:29 UTC --- On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 > > --- Comment #43 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-08 &

[Bug tree-optimization/50204] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed fully redundant load found in crafty (SPEC 2k)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-10 20:48:40 UTC --- On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204 > > --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10 &

[Bug tree-optimization/50346] Function call foils VRP/jump-threading of redundant predicate on struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-12 12:44:15 UTC --- On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, scovich at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50346 > > --- Comment #4 from Ryan Johnson 2011-10-12 >

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-12 14:15:56 UTC --- On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 > > --- Comment #12 from Paul Koning 2011-10-12 &

[Bug middle-end/50189] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code error in -O2 [-fstrict-enums] compile, target independent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-12 14:21:48 UTC --- On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189 > > --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de >

[Bug tree-optimization/50698] pretending to create versioning for alias when not required

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50698 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-17 09:26:05 UTC --- On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50698 > > --- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente

[Bug tree-optimization/50213] [4.6 Regression] Regression in space-optimized code relative to 4.5.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-17 09:33:49 UTC --- On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, propolice at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213 > > Eduardo Tongson changed: > >W

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-18 08:26:04 UTC --- On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 > > Paolo Carlini changed: > >

[Bug c++/44648] missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-18 10:46:18 UTC --- On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 > > Paolo Carlini changed: > >

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-19 07:48:30 UTC --- On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 > > --- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-19

[Bug tree-optimization/23855] loop header should also be pulled out of the inner loop too

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23855 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-20 07:43:44 UTC --- On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23855 > > --- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-19 &

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-27 10:26:02 UTC --- On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 > > --- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini > 2

[Bug driver/50876] [4.7 Regression] unrecognized command line option '-Zmultiply_defined suppress regressions for lto.exp on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-27 11:51:06 UTC --- On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876 > > --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-27 >

[Bug driver/50876] [4.7 Regression] unrecognized command line option '-Zmultiply_defined suppress regressions for lto.exp on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-27 13:25:11 UTC --- On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876 > > --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-27 >

[Bug driver/50876] [4.7 Regression] unrecognized command line option '-Zmultiply_defined suppress regressions for lto.exp on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-27 14:47:33 UTC --- On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876 > > --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth > 2

[Bug middle-end/49363] [feature request] multiple target attribute (and runtime dispatching based on cpuid)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-28 09:14:29 UTC --- On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363 > > --- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente

[Bug driver/50876] [4.7 Regression] unrecognized command line option '-Zmultiply_defined suppress regressions for lto.exp on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-28 10:01:45 UTC --- On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50876 > > --- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-28 >

[Bug tree-optimization/50955] [4.7 Regression] IVopts incorrectly rewrite the address of a global memory access into a local form.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50955 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-11-03 07:51:25 UTC --- On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, duyuehai at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50955 > > --- Comment #6 from Yuehai Du 2011-11-03 06:24:

[Bug regression/50999] [4.7 Regression]: g++.dg/lto/20081109 execute -O2 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fno-use-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-11-08 09:29:08 UTC --- On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50999 > > --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-07 &

[Bug tree-optimization/51012] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1897 with -fno-early-inlining and passing incompatible function ptr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51012 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-11-08 13:50:44 UTC --- On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51012 > > --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2011-11-08 &

[Bug tree-optimization/51058] [4.7 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call() in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:1992

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-11-10 09:29:52 UTC --- On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51058 > > --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-09 >

[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-02 08:21:57 UTC --- On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, marc.glisse at normalesup dot org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 > > --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse > 2012

[Bug rtl-optimization/53190] CSE (?) CSEs asms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-03 08:19:17 UTC --- On Thu, 3 May 2012, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190 > > --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-03 >

[Bug lto/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-04 08:17:57 UTC --- On Thu, 3 May 2012, andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 > > --- Comment #17 from Andi Kleen 2012-05-03 &

[Bug tree-optimization/53128] [4.8 Regression] Compiler produces infinite loop on regular O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53128 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-07 08:43:24 UTC --- On Fri, 4 May 2012, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53128 > > --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-04 &

[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-07 08:51:06 UTC --- On Fri, 4 May 2012, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 > > --- Comment #8 from glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012

[Bug lto/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 --- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-07 08:54:10 UTC --- On Sat, 5 May 2012, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 > > Jan Hubicka changed: > >W

[Bug debug/51564] [4.7 Regression] ICE in force_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:19288

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51564 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-14 08:12:44 UTC --- On Fri, 11 May 2012, matt at use dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51564 > > --- Comment #7 from Matt Hargett 2012-05-11 20:19:

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-23 07:04:51 UTC --- On Tue, 22 May 2012, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 > > --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt > 2

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-23 12:39:31 UTC --- On Wed, 23 May 2012, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 > > --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt > 2

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-24 07:29:52 UTC --- On Thu, 24 May 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >W

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-24 07:57:58 UTC --- On Thu, 24 May 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 > > --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-24 >

[Bug bootstrap/53522] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap is broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10 at r187977

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53522 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-30 09:11:53 UTC --- On Tue, 29 May 2012, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53522 > > Dominique d'Humieres changed: >

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-31 08:41:00 UTC --- On Wed, 30 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > --- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-30

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

ed as well. I'll give it a whirl on SPARC. --- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-31 10:38:23 UTC --- On Thu, 31 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > --- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-31 &g

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-05-31 10:48:19 UTC --- On Thu, 31 May 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-31 &

[Bug middle-end/48124] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 --- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-01 10:20:09 UTC --- On Wed, 30 May 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124 > > --- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-30

[Bug tree-optimization/53081] memcpy/memset loop recognition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-06 11:39:25 UTC --- On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53081 > > --- Comment #12 from Joost VandeVondele

[Bug debug/53470] [4.8 Regression] ICE when linking with -g in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:4264

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-06 11:55:32 UTC --- On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, jason at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470 > > Jason Merrill changed: > >W

[Bug rtl-optimization/32629] missing CSE for constant in registers / inefficient memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32629 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-11 08:39:45 UTC --- On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32629 > > --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2012-06-09 22:17:

[Bug bootstrap/53681] s390 bootstrap failure since 187965

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-18 08:24:51 UTC --- On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681 > > --- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-06-18 &

[Bug tree-optimization/53726] [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-20 13:30:21 UTC --- On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 > > --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-20 12:46:

[Bug tree-optimization/53726] [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-20 14:53:58 UTC --- On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 > > --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-20 14:43:

[Bug tree-optimization/53726] [4.8 Regression] aes test performance drop for eembc_2_0_peak_32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-21 08:46:11 UTC --- On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53726 > > --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-20 15:36:

[Bug middle-end/38756] 107t.ivopts introduces pointer truncation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-21 12:12:24 UTC --- On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, bigotp at acm dot org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38756 > > --- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot 2012-06-21 >

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-26 08:35:59 UTC --- On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >W

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-27 08:28:27 UTC --- On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 > > --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt > 2

[Bug middle-end/53676] [4.7 regression] empty loop is not always removed now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53676 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-28 08:26:12 UTC --- On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, matt at use dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53676 > > --- Comment #10 from Matt Hargett 2012-06-27 18:26:

[Bug middle-end/53616] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53616 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-28 08:26:42 UTC --- On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53616 > > Pat Haugen changed: > >W

[Bug middle-end/53844] [4.6/4.7 Regression] GCC generates suboptimal code for unused members of classes in some cases on multiple targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-07-04 13:47:09 UTC --- On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, ed at edrosten dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844 > > Edward Rosten changed: > >W

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] pair(pair&&) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-07-13 12:53:51 UTC --- On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 > > --- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini > 2

[Bug fortran/53957] Polyhedron 11 benchmark: MP_PROP_DESIGN twice as long as other compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-07-18 13:18:13 UTC --- On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957 > > Tobias Burnus changed: > >W

[Bug rtl-optimization/54016] loop optimizer: no "branch on count" on s390 anymore since revision 185913

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-07-20 14:00:23 UTC --- On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54016 > > --- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-07-20 &

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #70 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-07-30 08:43:09 UTC --- On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 > > --- Comment #69 from Mikael Morin 2012-07-28 &

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-07-30 08:47:35 UTC --- On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 > > William J. Schmidt changed: > >

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #72 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-07-30 11:04:39 UTC --- On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 > > --- Comment #71 from Mikael Morin 2012-07-30 &

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #74 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-07-30 12:33:01 UTC --- On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 > > --- Comment #73 from Mikael Morin 2012-07-30 &

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #76 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-08-01 12:28:10 UTC --- On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 > > --- Comment #75 from Mikael Morin 2012-08-01 &

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #79 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-08-01 15:05:22 UTC --- On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 > > --- Comment #78 from Mikael Morin 2012-08-01 &

[Bug tree-optimization/54146] Very slow compile with attribute((flatten))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-08-02 10:35:56 UTC --- On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146 > > Steven Bosscher changed: > >W

[Bug middle-end/51994] [4.6/4.7 Regression] git-1.7.8.3 miscompiled due to negative bitpos from get_inner_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994 --- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-01 16:00:41 UTC --- On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994 > > --- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-01

[Bug middle-end/51994] [4.6/4.7 Regression] git-1.7.8.3 miscompiled due to negative bitpos from get_inner_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994 --- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-02 08:56:04 UTC --- On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994 > > --- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-01

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 11:57:43 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 &

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 12:29:36 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13 &

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 14:03:27 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 14:13:39 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-13 14:18:58 UTC --- On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > >W

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >