[Bug tree-optimization/94566] conversion between std::strong_ordering and int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94566 Bug 94566 depends on bug 33315, which changed state. Bug 33315 Summary: stores not commoned by sinking https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/84859] [8 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on a memcpy in a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84859 Bug 84859 depends on bug 33315, which changed state. Bug 33315 Summary: stores not commoned by sinking https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/91532] [SVE] Redundant predicated store in gcc.target/aarch64/fmla_2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91532 Bug 91532 depends on bug 33315, which changed state. Bug 33315 Summary: stores not commoned by sinking https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33315 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/95133] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:6075

|P2 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |8.5 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Mine then.

[Bug target/95134] Add a target option to avoid libcall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95134 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/95140] [10/11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow for a loop unrolled past the end of a trailing array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95140 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/95143] SFINAE failure with static_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95143 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug c/95145] [8/9/10/11 Regression]internal compiler error: in analyze_functions, at cgraphunit.c:1380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95145 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug bootstrap/95147] [11 Regression] Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug bootstrap/95147] New: Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ?-fcf-protection? gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ?-mshstk? Makefile:603: recipe for target 'libz_a-adle

[Bug bootstrap/95147] [11 Regression] Bootstrap fails with GCC 4.8 host compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95147 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- --disable-cet seems to be a workaround, it looks like the configury fails to check for host compiler support (or alternatively --disable-cet should be the default for stage1?)

[Bug c/95141] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Incorrect integer overflow warning message for bitand expression

at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- So there's already (OVF) at ((long unsigned int) IA1 & 158(OVF)) & 1 but we only check 375 if (TREE_OVERFLOW_P (ret) 376 && !TREE

[Bug tree-optimization/95133] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95133 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regr

[Bug target/95154] [11 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/pure-virtual1.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95154 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/95158] [10/11 Regression] Templates + Diamond Inheritance + Final = Pure Virtual Function Call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95158 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.3.0 Keywords|

[Bug libgomp/95163] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses, at gimplify.c:10440 since r7-4447-gb4c3a85be9658537

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95163 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Keywords|

[Bug c++/95164] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE regression starting with 9.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95164 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||9.3.0 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/95171] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong outgoing edge flags at end of bb 2)

at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I'll take a look.

[Bug tree-optimization/95171] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong outgoing edge flags at end of bb 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95171 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- OK, so this is always_inline crossing a IL semantic boundary (-fnon-call-exceptions + -ffinite-math-only). In w9 NaN > 0.0 does not trap but when inlined into o7 it suddenly does and thus is invalid GIMPLE.

[Bug tree-optimization/95172] [11 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-272-gb6ff3ddecfa93d53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95172 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/95176] Failure to optimize division followed by multiplication to modulo followed by subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95176 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug c++/95181] [10/11 Regression] ICE in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:241 since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95181 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2 Priority|P3

[Bug preprocessor/95183] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in _cpp_lex_direct)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95183 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/95172] [11 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-272-gb6ff3ddecfa93d53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95172 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/57359] store motion causes wrong code for union access at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57359 Bug 57359 depends on bug 95172, which changed state. Bug 95172 Summary: [11 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-272-gb6ff3ddecfa93d53 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95172 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/95171] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong outgoing edge flags at end of bb 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95171 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|11.0| Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/95185] Failure to optimize specific kind of sign comparison check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95185 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/95185] Failure to optimize specific kind of sign comparison check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95185 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Btw, thanks for all these bugreports!

[Bug c/95141] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Incorrect integer overflow warning message for bitand expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > So there's already (OVF) at > > ((long unsigned int) IA1 & 158(OVF)) & 1 > > but we only check > > 375 if (TREE_OVERFLOW_P (ret) > 376

[Bug tree-optimization/95187] Failure to optimize bool check into consecutive literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95187 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/95189] [10/11 Regression] memcmp being wrongly stripped like strcmp

CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed. It looks like string handling creeps in here somehow during RTL expansion.

[Bug lto/95190] Documentation for -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95190 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- This is new behavior for warnings in GCC 10 and now how all other optimization options behave - the option state is fixed per function at compile-time and carried over to link-time. Indeed warning options a

[Bug c++/95192] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in handle_assume_aligned_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:2996

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95192 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug lto/95194] bootstrap-lto fails on musl (bundled libintl uses asm aliases)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95194 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/95199] Remove extra variable created for memory reference in loop vectorization.

||amker at gcc dot gnu.org, ||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- But IVOPTs is supposed to know how to eliminate equal IVs. Maybe it's confused about the IFN uses?

[Bug bootstrap/95205] patch commit, and making gcc error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95205 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- read the full message, you need to copy gcc/tm.texi to $src/gcc/doc/

[Bug rtl-optimization/95210] internal compiler error: in prepare_copy_insn, at gcse.c:1988

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95210 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- testcase?

[Bug target/95211] [11 Regression] ICE in emit_unop_insn, at optabs.c:3622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95211 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/95202] Assignment to a member is wrongly optimized away by g++ with -fstrict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95202 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #1 from Ric

[Bug target/95218] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fma_run_double_1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/95219] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/x86_64/costmodel-pr30843.c

|1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I think this one is a bit older though

[Bug target/95219] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/x86_64/costmodel-pr30843.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95219 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Coalesce list: (4)ivtmp.15_4 & (22)ivtmp.15_22 [map: 2, 9] : Success -> 2 Coalesce list: (1)vect_vec_iv_.7_1 & (19)_19 [map: 0, 7] : Success -> 0 Coalesce list: (17)_17 & (18)vect_vec_iv_.8_18 [map: 5, 6] :

[Bug c++/95222] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.1 x86 issue with function pointers with calling convention attribute and template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC 10.1 x86 issue with |[10/11 Regression] GCC 10.1

[Bug lto/95224] -flto -save-temps uses very unusual name for resolution file, looks arbitrary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/95199] Remove extra variable created for memory reference in loop vectorization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95199 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Btw, there's already vinfo->ivexpr_map to aid simplifying the IL to a point where IVOPTs can eliminate redundant IVs. Eliminating them in the vectorizer is more complicated because of all the code for the I

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] Wrong

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|11.0| Summary|[8/9/10 Regression]

[Bug c/95141] [8/9/10 Regression] Incorrect integer overflow warning message for bitand expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0 Summary|[8/9/10/11 Re

[Bug c++/95233] Failure to compile regression in GCC 10.1 and 11 trunk with C++ 20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|c++-concepts|10.1.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/95231] [11 Regression] error: the first argument of a ‘vec_cond_expr’ must be of a boolean vector type of the since r11-451-gfe168751c5c1c517

at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Oops.

[Bug target/95235] Failure to properly optimize out register use in bit-twiddling code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/95234] [11 Regression] 416.gamess Miscompare of exam29.out since r11-455-g94f687bd9ae37ece

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95234 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/95171] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong outgoing edge flags at end of bb 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95171 Bug 95171 depends on bug 95231, which changed state. Bug 95231 Summary: [11 Regression] error: the first argument of a ‘vec_cond_expr’ must be of a boolean vector type of the since r11-451-gfe168751c5c1c517 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/95231] [11 Regression] error: the first argument of a ‘vec_cond_expr’ must be of a boolean vector type of the since r11-451-gfe168751c5c1c517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95231 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/95219] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/x86_64/costmodel-pr30843.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95219 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/95229] [11 Regression] in mark_jump_label_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* CC|

[Bug target/95229] [11 Regression] in mark_jump_label_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Built by #5 0x020c4504 in gen_rtx_fmt_ee_stat (code=VEC_SELECT, mode=E_V2SImode, arg0=0x0, arg1=0x76ad92e0) at ./genrtl.h:49 #6 0x0211e242 in gen_sse4_1_zero_extendv2siv2di2 (

[Bug target/95229] [11 Regression] in mark_jump_label_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Built by > > #5 0x020c4504 in gen_rtx_fmt_ee_stat (code=VEC_SELECT, > mode=E_V2SImode, arg0=0x0, arg1=0x76ad92e0) at ./genrtl.h:49 > #6 0x00

[Bug target/95237] New: LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The testcase and a few others now ICEs on x86_64 with -m32 since LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 shrinks

[Bug target/95218] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fma_run_double_1.c execution test since r11-455-g94f687bd9ae37ece

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Note a 'use' is not something that needs to be preserved, so (define_insn_and_split "*2" [(set (match_operand:VF 0 "register_operand" "=x,v") (absneg:VF (match_operand:VF 1 "vector_oper

[Bug target/95238] [11 Regression] Invalid *pushsi2_rex64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/95241] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have range_expr in to_wide, at tree.h:5900

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95241 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/95242] [10/11 Regression] spurious "warning: zero as null pointer constant [-Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant]" on comparisons with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95242 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.3.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/95248] [11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r11-272-gb6ff3ddecfa93d53

|--- |11.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Mine.

[Bug target/95251] x86 code size expansion inserting field into a union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95251 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-22 Target|

[Bug target/95253] [10/11 Regression] Build failure on MSys. Wrong dependency file escaping on Windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Version|unknown

[Bug target/95255] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gen_roundevendf2, at config/i386/i386.md:16328 since r10-2809-gd3b92f35d84f44a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95255 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/95261] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p8.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr80695-p9.c fail starting with r11-478

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/95266] [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr69907.c fails on power 7

|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I will have a look.

[Bug tree-optimization/95268] ICE: invalid ‘PHI’ argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95268 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/95125] Unoptimal code for vectorized conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95125 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/95264] Infinite Loop When Compiling Templated C++ code at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95264 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed. We do have (a) huuuge function here, containing 539237 basic blocks after early inlining which is void polyquad::BaseDomain::expand(const VectorXT&, polyquad::BaseDomain::MatrixPtsT&) const [wit

[Bug c++/95264] Infinite Loop When Compiling Templated C++ code at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95264 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- We're then inlining some more costing another ~5GB ontop of the early optimization memory use of ~5GB (might be other IPA transforms than inlining as well). The big function is meanwhile 2 million basic blo

[Bug c++/95264] Infinite Loop When Compiling Templated C++ code at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/95248] [11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops since r11-272-gb6ff3ddecfa93d53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95248 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/95264] Infinite Loop When Compiling Templated C++ code at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c++/95264] Infinite Loop When Compiling Templated C++ code at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95264 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- So confirmed we eventually blow up at -O1: ++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus compilation terminated. Command exited with non-zero status 1

[Bug target/95218] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fma_run_double_1.c execution test since r11-455-g94f687bd9ae37ece

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/95268] ICE: invalid ‘PHI’ argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95268 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95271] ice in vect_get_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:3638

|11.0 Last reconfirmed||2020-05-25 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Mine.

[Bug tree-optimization/95272] ice in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6197

|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2020-05-25 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Version|unknown |11.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/95273] [11 regression] many ICEs after r11-564

||2020-05-25 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Mine.

[Bug middle-end/95277] error on alignment for a function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95277 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The question is whether those attributes shall change the ABI or whether it is enough for GCC to apply this alignment to the incoming variable by eventually issueing a callee-copy. And what happens to C++ t

[Bug tree-optimization/95281] ICE: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:247

||2020-05-25 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I will take a look.

[Bug tree-optimization/95283] ICE: in hoist_memory_references, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2607

|1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2020-05-25 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I will take a look.

[Bug tree-optimization/95284] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95284 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/95290] ice in useless_type_conversion_p

|1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2020-05-25 Component|c++ |tree-optimization --- Comment

[Bug c++/95291] ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95291 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/95295] g++ produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops

||2020-05-25 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed, mine.

[Bug tree-optimization/95297] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95297 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/95305] Same code takes ~1/4 to 1/7th the time to compile under clang++.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/95308] ICE: in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr with -O3 -march=skylake-avx512

|1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- (gdb) p debug_generic_expr (addr) &MEM[symbol: a, index: ivtmp.36_228, step: 4, offset

[Bug middle-end/95309] [11 Regression] Many targets failing ssa-dom-cse-2.c after vectorizer changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95309 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/95295] g++ produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95295 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 95283 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/95283] ICE: in hoist_memory_references, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95283 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/95272] ice in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:6197 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95272 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- static void vect_slp_rearrange_stmts (slp_tree node, unsigned int group_size, vec permutation, hash_set &visited) { ... /* ??? Computation node

[Bug tree-optimization/95297] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95297 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- w/o C++ headers: extern bool var_10; extern int var_16; extern short var_17; extern long var_18; extern int arr_3[][13]; int min(const int &a, const int &b) { return a < b ? a : b; } void test() { f

[Bug tree-optimization/95297] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95297 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- OK, so here we're using a scalar shift arg - this is also not reflected in the SLP tree. Ideally we'd add a vect_scalar_def for this.

[Bug tree-optimization/95284] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95284 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95290] ice in useless_type_conversion_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95290 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >