Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following example generates incorrect code:
void (*f)();
int xx;
void tailcall (int i)
{
int arr[5000];
xx = arr[i];
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370
--- Comment #1 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Thu Feb 1 13:02:24 2018
New Revision: 257294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR83370][AARCH64]Use tighter register constraint for sibcall patterns.
In a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370
--- Comment #4 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Thu Feb 1 21:09:06 2018
New Revision: 257314
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257314&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR83370][AARCH64]Use tighter register constraint for sibcall patterns.
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370
--- Comment #5 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Thu Feb 1 21:33:05 2018
New Revision: 257315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR83370][AARCH64]Use tighter register constraint for sibcall patterns.
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83370
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
For a test case like this,
#include
struct
||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |renlin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87562
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87563
--- Comment #4 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Mon Oct 15 16:49:05 2018
New Revision: 265172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265172&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR87563][AARCH64-SVE]: Don't keep ifcvt loop when COND_ ifn could not be
vec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87563
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following test case ICEs with:
-march=armv8.2-a+sve -O3 and -Ofast
int a, b, d;
short e;
void f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87815
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87815
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
since r264897, native arm-linux-gnueabihf toolchain has been mis-compiled.
Somehow, it survives boostrap.
It ICEs when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
--- Comment #1 from Renlin Li ---
in tree-loop-distribution.c, distribution_loop function, I got the following
code snippets.
30386: 0103cff4 4 OBJECT LOCAL DEFAULT 25 _ZL23bb_top_order_index_s
30387: 0103cff8 4 OBJECT LOCAL DEF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
--- Comment #2 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 44965
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44965&action=edit
disassembly of distribute_loop
disassembly of wrongly compiled distribute_loop function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
--- Comment #3 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to Renlin Li from comment #1)
> in tree-loop-distribution.c, distribution_loop function, I got the following
> code snippets.
>
> 30386: 0103cff4 4 OBJECT LOCAL DEFAULT 25 _ZL23bb_top_order_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
--- Comment #5 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 44974
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44974&action=edit
IRA dump
The code you want to check is the following in ira pass:
insn 10905: r1 = r2040
insn 208: use and update r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87899
--- Comment #6 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 44975
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44975&action=edit
IRA dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87815
--- Comment #1 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Mon Nov 12 16:47:24 2018
New Revision: 266033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266033&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR87815]Don't generate shift sequence for load replacement in DSE when the
m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87815
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
--- Comment #4 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Nov 21 14:29:19 2018
New Revision: 266345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266345&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH][PR84877]Dynamically align the address for local parameter copy on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64152
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Renlin Li ---
r227215 [AArch64][TLSLE][3/3] Implement local executable mode for all memory
model
r227213 [AArch64][TLSLE][2/3] Rename SYMBOL_TLSLE to SYMBOL_TLSLE24
r227212 [AArch64
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The ICE is triggered when building linux toolchain with local change to gcc
aarch64 backend.
vfprintf.c: In function ‘_IO_vfwprintf’:
vfprintf.c:1689:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70030
--- Comment #5 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #3)
> (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #2)
> > Waiting.
>
> Actually, I have a candidate patch to deal with scratches created during
> LRA. But I can not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70030
--- Comment #7 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #6)
> Created attachment 38033 [details]
> A patch
>
> Here is the patch which might solve the problem.
Hi Vladimir, sorry for the late reply. I am just back from holi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81067
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81179
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #24 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 40473
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40473&action=edit
memset.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #23 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 40472
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40472&action=edit
test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #25 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 40474
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40474&action=edit
reduced objdump assembler file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81351
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46038
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65459
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |renlin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65326
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66776
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66776
--- Comment #1 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Fri Oct 2 11:55:04 2015
New Revision: 228384
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228384&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH][AARCH64][PR66776]Add cmovdi_insn_uxtw patte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67715
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67383
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67794
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67794
--- Comment #11 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> After the backport patch to branch 5, aarch-none-elf fails to build because
> of the following ICEs.
>
I mean "aarch64-none-elf" here, sorry for the typo.
|nu |nu,
||arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Renlin Li ---
same issue happens on arm-none-linuxgnu-eabihf toolchain.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66776
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66556
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61413
--- Comment #3 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Fri Jan 9 13:55:16 2015
New Revision: 219386
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219386&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM]Fix definition of __ARM_SIZEOF_WCHAR_T.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64551
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|alpha-linux-gnu |alpha-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64552
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64551
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63424
--- Comment #6 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Tue Jan 13 16:25:00 2015
New Revision: 219540
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219540&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Implement v2di3 pattern
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63424
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61413
--- Comment #4 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Jan 14 11:02:24 2015
New Revision: 219587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219587&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM]Fix definition of __ARM_SIZEOF_WCHAR_T.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61413
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149
--- Comment #7 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Tue Jan 20 10:26:18 2015
New Revision: 219884
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219884&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR 64149: Remove -mlra/-mno-lra option for A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #7 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Feb 4 09:24:56 2015
New Revision: 220392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220392&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH][libstdc++][Testsuite] isctype test fails fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63762
--- Comment #5 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Nov 19 15:15:51 2014
New Revision: 217783
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217783&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-19 Renlin Li
PR middle-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63424
--- Comment #4 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Nov 19 16:34:38 2014
New Revision: 217786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217786&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Implement v2di3 pattern
gcc/:
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
--- Comment #24 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Fri Nov 28 11:01:27 2014
New Revision: 218143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add testcase for PR63661.
2014-11-28 Renlin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
--- Comment #25 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Fri Nov 28 11:18:47 2014
New Revision: 218144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use native tune. nehalem is not able to triggle the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
--- Comment #29 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Dec 3 11:13:50 2014
New Revision: 218306
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218306&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
gcc/
2014-12-03 R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63762
--- Comment #8 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Dec 3 11:13:50 2014
New Revision: 218306
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218306&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
gcc/
2014-12-03 R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67383
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67477
--- Comment #7 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> The ICE has been on
> (insn 105 746 971 5 (parallel [
> (set (reg:V16QI 60 d22 [720])
> (unspec:V16QI [
> (reg:V16
gcc dot gnu.org |renlin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #11)
> Looks like
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2015-08/msg00665.html
>
> would be an appropriate fix for this.
I verified that, this patch fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082
--- Comment #13 from Renlin Li ---
This problem can be reproduced using gcc 4.9.3 (r225077), and can be fixed by
r227129.
However, in branch 4.9 with the latest code, this bug cannot be trigger any
more. I have done a quick bisect, and find out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082
--- Comment #14 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Tue Jan 12 17:32:18 2016
New Revision: 232284
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232284&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Backport][PR69082][ARM]Backport "[PATCH][ARM]Tighten the conditions for
arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 35789
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35789&action=edit
test case
The test case is attached.
toolchain bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66556
renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66556
--- Comment #1 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(insn 22 94 24 4 (set (reg:SI 140 [ g+2 ])
(zero_extend:SI (mem/c:HI (post_modify:SI (reg/f:SI 156)
(plus:SI (reg/f:SI 156)
(const_int 20 [0x14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66556
--- Comment #3 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Mon Jul 13 08:29:46 2015
New Revision: 225729
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225729&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH]Fix PR66556. Don't drop s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66556
--- Comment #4 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: renlin
Date: Wed Jul 15 15:13:36 2015
New Revision: 225835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH]Fix PR66556. Don't drop s
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36067
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36067&action=edit
test case
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67028
--- Comment #2 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1)
> I have a hard time reproducing this. Could you show the generated
> assembler code, and say why you think it is a combine bug?
This
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
The following two functions shall give the same result 3.
Currently, foo () can be optimized to return a constant.
bar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
--- Comment #9 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to nsz from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> > > Or we could do like clang and improve alias analysis. We should know that
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70030
--- Comment #8 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #6)
> Created attachment 38033 [details]
> A patch
>
> Here is the patch which might solve the problem.
Hi Vladimir,
Do you have plan to check this patch in?
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #14 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Thu Jul 28 11:21:53 2016
New Revision: 238815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238815&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] Revert Revert r238497 because of PR 71961.
This patch reverts the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902
--- Comment #6 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Thu Jul 28 11:21:53 2016
New Revision: 238815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238815&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] Revert Revert r238497 because of PR 71961.
This patch reverts the ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #15 from Renlin Li ---
The change r238497 has been reverted as r238815.
I confirmed that, after the revert, the 178.gagel mis-compare
is fixed in aarch64-linux environment.
PR 71902 is reopend as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971
--- Comment #17 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Tue Aug 9 17:20:14 2016
New Revision: 239300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH][PR64971]Convert function pointer to Pmode when emit call.
gcc/
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #11 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #10)
> I've noticed that something similar to what Renlin suggested was committed
> to trunk as r238728.
>
> Could this testcase fix be backported to the release branch
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 49362
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49362&action=edit
test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399
--- Comment #1 from Renlin Li ---
Created attachment 49363
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49363&action=edit
test case 2
92 matches
Mail list logo
