[Bug libstdc++/54451] c++11/random.cc build failure when _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1 is not defined in config.h

2012-09-08 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rbmj at verizon dot net

[Bug libstdc++/54451] c++11/random.cc build failure when _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1 is not defined in config.h

2012-09-09 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451 --- Comment #6 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-09-09 18:08:11 UTC --- Making local changes to bring stdint.h into compliance works for me as well. (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Maybe it would be nice to use

[Bug target/54631] New: vxworks.c fails to compile

2012-09-19 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54631 Bug #: 54631 Summary: vxworks.c fails to compile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/54631] vxworks.c fails to compile

2012-09-20 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54631 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-10-01 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #9 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-02 01:08:00 UTC --- Paolo: This was wrapped up with several other fixincludes patches with regards to vxWorks, and Bruce Korb has approved the set and has agreed to commit. However

[Bug target/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-10-02 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #11 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-02 18:21:50 UTC --- I've tried to split it up as I think Bruce wanted; if you check the thread, those patches should all be ready.

[Bug target/54805] New: __gthread* on VxWorks

2012-10-03 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54805 Bug #: 54805 Summary: __gthread* on VxWorks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/54805] __gthread* on VxWorks

2012-10-29 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54805 --- Comment #1 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-29 19:22:09 UTC --- Ping? Robert Mason

[Bug libstdc++/55126] New: Libstdc++-v3 fails to compile

2012-10-29 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126 Bug #: 55126 Summary: Libstdc++-v3 fails to compile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug target/55126] Libstdc++-v3 fails to compile

2012-10-29 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126 --- Comment #2 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-30 01:04:08 UTC --- git bisect reports that commit that introduced the regression is svn: 192488 (or git: 584abc984ad...). I don't know enough about the codebase to easily tell wher

[Bug target/54805] __gthread* on VxWorks

2012-10-29 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54805 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28349|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug middle-end/54957] Two crashes introduced by rev192488

2012-10-29 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rbmj at verizon dot net

[Bug middle-end/54957] Two crashes introduced by rev192488

2012-10-29 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957 --- Comment #19 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-30 01:59:10 UTC --- *** Bug 55126 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/55126] Libstdc++-v3 fails to compile

2012-10-29 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/53378] gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks

2012-10-29 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-10-29 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/54957] Two crashes introduced by rev192488

2012-11-01 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957 --- Comment #21 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-11-01 18:05:36 UTC --- That fixes it for me :)

[Bug target/53264] gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0)

2012-11-05 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug gcov-profile/53264] New: gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0)

2012-05-07 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264 Bug #: 53264 Summary: gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UN

[Bug gcov-profile/53264] gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0)

2012-05-07 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264 --- Comment #1 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-07 13:47:11 UTC --- Created attachment 27333 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27333 Proposed fix (against 4.7.0 sources)

[Bug target/53378] New: gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks

2012-05-16 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378 Bug #: 53378 Summary: gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/53378] gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks

2012-05-16 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378 --- Comment #2 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-16 16:33:36 UTC --- No it is not. regs.h is a system header on VxWorks. I can see a big: /* regs.h - CPU registers */ /* Copyright 1984-2003 Wind River Systems, Inc. */ At the top of /usr

[Bug target/53378] gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks

2012-05-18 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378 --- Comment #4 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-18 12:16:29 UTC --- The issue is that this is affecting a system header (ioLib.h) which is included from other, standard header files.

[Bug target/53264] gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0)

2012-05-19 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264 --- Comment #2 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-19 20:39:14 UTC --- ping? I retagged with component:target, in hopes that someone will see. It's trivial - it shouldn't be an issue.

[Bug target/53443] New: Bad Macro Definition SUBSUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS in vxworks.h

2012-05-21 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53443 Bug #: 53443 Summary: Bad Macro Definition SUBSUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS in vxworks.h Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/53264] gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0)

2012-05-21 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27333|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug libfortran/53445] New: No sticky bit on VxWorks - fix chmod.c

2012-05-21 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53445 Bug #: 53445 Summary: No sticky bit on VxWorks - fix chmod.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug libfortran/53444] New: Accommodate non-compliant strerror_r() on VxWorks.

2012-05-21 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53444 Bug #: 53444 Summary: Accommodate non-compliant strerror_r() on VxWorks. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/53456] New: Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 Bug #: 53456 Summary: Add time support for VxWorks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 --- Comment #1 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-22 19:04:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27479 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27479 Patch against trunk

[Bug libstdc++/53457] New: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 Bug #: 53457 Summary: Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rbmj at verizon dot net

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 --- Comment #4 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 13:10:14 UTC --- VxWorks does not provide the process time in most versions and for most cases. In fact, many VxWorks applications are not processes in the traditional sense but instead tasks

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #3 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 13:13:16 UTC --- I don't know much about fixincludes, but it *seems* to me like it could be done with fixincludes. I don't know how to get fixincludes to do that, though. Also, sor

[Bug target/53378] gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378 --- Comment #5 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 17:27:09 UTC --- Could this be fixed by a fixincludes stub somewhat like the following? /* * Work around same-named gcc header regs.h in taskLib.h on VxWorks */ fix = { hackname

[Bug target/53378] gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378 --- Comment #7 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 17:57:53 UTC --- > > Could this be fixed by a fixincludes stub somewhat like the following? > > I don't understand why you cannot use a similar trick as > ada/sigtramp-p

[Bug target/53378] gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378 --- Comment #9 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 19:29:23 UTC --- Created attachment 27482 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27482 Errors introduced by gcc/regs.h The problem is that gcc/regs.h introduces its own err

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-24 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-24 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #5 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-24 20:39:20 UTC --- Would something like the following fixincludes hacks work? /* * Wrap VxWorks ioctl to keep everything pretty */ fix = { hackname= vxworks_ioctl_macro; files

[Bug target/53443] Bad Macro Definition SUBSUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS in vxworks.h

2012-06-01 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53443 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/53264] gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0)

2012-06-25 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27468|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug target/53264] gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0)

2012-06-25 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264 --- Comment #5 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-06-25 18:19:57 UTC --- Created attachment 27702 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27702 Fixincludes rule to allow gcc/libgcov.c to compile

[Bug target/53264] gcc/gcov-io.c and gcc/libgcov.c fail to compile (target vxWorks - gcc 4.7.0)

2012-06-25 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264 --- Comment #6 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-06-25 18:20:36 UTC --- OK, so two new patches. 1. For gcc/gcov-io.c: Patch posted at [1] and attached to the bug. 2. For gcc/libgcov.c: Patch posted at [2], approved at [3], and attached to the bug

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-06-25 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #7 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-06-25 18:23:02 UTC --- Fixed with this (approved, but not committed) patch series: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00382.html

[Bug target/53378] gcc/regs.h hides system header regs.h on vxWorks

2012-06-25 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378 --- Comment #10 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-06-25 18:25:11 UTC --- This issue is resolved in this (approved, not committed) patch series here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00382.html, specifically http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc

[Bug libstdc++/59680] New: Compile error in thread.cc

2014-01-04 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rbmj at verizon dot net Line 186 of thread.cc: ::sleep(__s.count() + (__ns >= 100)); There are two issues with this: 1) Semantically, it doesn't make sense that there would only be 6 zeros after anything dealing with nan