https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61536
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work||4.7.2
Keywords||wrong-code
Last reconfirmed||2014-06-19
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed in 4.5.0 but not earlier.
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
--- Comment #15 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed. ... Wont fix on the 4.3 branch which is now long dead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65376
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65376
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64916
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |---
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64172
--- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Vlad,
are you planning a 4.9 backport ?
Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #25 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed presumably ?
||2015-03-13
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org,
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.8.0, 4.8.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #15 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
I'm going to remove the regression marker on this as this is now just purely
further code size improvements. Please submit patches on
gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org for further discussion. Patches attached t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65414
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2015-03-17
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65459
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61551
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |6.0
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can't you not use just a move instead of a ldr here? basically it is the
> assembler wh
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
fixed ?
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to amker from comment #4)
> Author: amker
> Date: Wed Apr 22 09:37:52 2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65711
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2015-04-22
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org,
||yvan.roux at linaro dot org
Known to work
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2015-04-22
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60758
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #3)
> Hi,
> I tried to reproduce the error with a reduced test-case:
>
> #include "arm_neon.h"
>
> float32x2_t a, b, c, e;
>
> int main()
> {
> e = __built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11)
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
> >
> > --- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
Assignee|unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Apr 23 14:49:45 2015
New Revision: 222371
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222371&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/26702
For Kwok Cheung Yeung.
Added:
trunk/gc
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed -
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2015-04-27
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1
||2015-04-27
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
The feature just isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #22 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #18)
> Created attachment 35420 [details]
> patch to override default options by options in object file
>
> Hi,
>
> The following untested patch gives prefer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #23 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #20)
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
> >
> > --- Comment #17 from
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2015-04-30
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Adding Vlad to CC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66049
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
assigned to Venkat.
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2015-05-15
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2015-05-15
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
Bug 64835 depends on bug 66015, which changed state.
Bug 66015 Summary: align directives not propagated after __attribute__
((__optimize__ ("O2")))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66015
What|Removed
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed - presumably.
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mwahab at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Assigned to Matthew as he's looking into this.
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
ARM / AArch64 have a relaxed memory model, the ports need to define
TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING and the corresponding macros for li
||2015-05-19
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.8.0, 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #28 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to chrbr from comment #27)
> >
> > Should be reproducible without LTO with
> >
> > int __attribute__((target("fpu=neon"))) main()
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > and compiling without -mfpu=
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |6.0
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed on trunk.
||2015-05-21
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu May 21 09:23:14 2015
New Revision: 223473
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223473&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/26702
For Kwok Cheung Yeung.
Modified:
trunk
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66239
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|ICE: verify_type failed |[6 regression] [ARM] ICE:
|while building libstdc++|verify_type failed while
|(dwarfout.c:|building libstdc++
|gen_type_die_with_usage()) |(dwarfout.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue May 26 13:21:16 2015
New Revision: 223695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/66181
2015-05-26 Ramana Radhakrishnan
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64045
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57907
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Ramana R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59993
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59993
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #4)
> I am seeing the same with a cross compiler configured with
>
>
> $SRCDIR/configure --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi --with-arch=armv7-a
> --with-fpu
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Presumably fixed ?
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
This is now fixed.
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-02-06
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment
||2014-02-06
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Looks to me like this is fixed. Trying
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58847
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
St
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Works for me on trunk
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-02-07
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
This looks like a case due
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed. I don't see these in any of my recent test results.
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
looks like a dup of 60030
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60030 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60030
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59904
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-02-07
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
-01-20 00:00:00 |2014-02-07
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913 was something similar. Can
you see if it
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|4.9.0 |4.8.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed now presumably.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2014-02-07
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org,
||yvan.roux at linaro dot org
Ever confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60109
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57907
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
This is something that I've just noticed with spec2k gzip : longest_match.
If the function is compiled for a cros
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60162
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 32120
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32120&action=edit
Reduced from gzip.
Command line options.
-march=armv7-a -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -mthumb -O3 -mlra
||2014-02-26
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
confirmed.
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
For 4.9 we just ended up disabling the vec_perm support for AArch64 BE, thanks
to this patch - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00988
||2014-03-10
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
4.2.1 is completely unsupported. There is not enough information here to try
and reproduce
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed as per Vlad's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60109
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60106
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2014-03-11
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.8.0, 4.8.1
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58424
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
||2014-03-13
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed - Kyrill worked out that it was one of the MOVE_COSTS IIRC for this
purpose.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67280
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |ipa
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304
--- Comment #24 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Sep 11 09:44:26 2015
New Revision: 227679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove separate movtf pattern - Use an iterator for all FP modes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304
--- Comment #25 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Sep 14 13:16:59 2015
New Revision: 227748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Handle literal pools for functions > 1 MiB in size.
T
||2015-09-22
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |michael.collison at
linaro dot org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66755
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2015-09-30
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
With the latest build for aarch64-none-linux-gnu of 4.9 and trunk that I had
lying around, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67143
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697
--- Comment #73 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Now fixed ,Matthew ?
Ramana
601 - 700 of 1217 matches
Mail list logo
