||2011-09-12
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-09-12
08:47:47 UTC ---
It should just be %%( and %%). As Jakub says the %) and %( are only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hope at linaro dot
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-09-13
06:31:39 UTC ---
Looks like a DUP of PR48308.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 48308 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50150
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-09-20
22:32:49 UTC ---
I think this is a bootstrap issue rather than a problem with libgomp . A
reduced testcase of this form fails with the stage2 compiler but is ok with the
stage1 compiler.
stru
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Known to fail||
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-09-29
14:40:28 UTC ---
Trunk should now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50099
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-09-30 09:36:47 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Sep 30 09:36:43 2011
New Revision: 179378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179378
Log:
Fix PR target/50099
Added:
trunk/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19599
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-09-30
09:57:06 UTC ---
The patch as applied today causes some bootstrap failures and I'm investigating
that.
Ramana
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-12
14:12:54 UTC ---
These tests no longer exist in the repository and have been reworked.
This is thus invalid.
ramana
|unassigned at gcc dot |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-18
14:58:13 UTC ---
I finished testing this with some other patches and backports that I had.
Should commit in the next day or two.
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50106
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-20
09:07:36 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Oct 20 09:07:30 2011
New Revision: 180240
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180240
Log:
2011-10-20 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50106
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-20
09:24:10 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Oct 20 09:24:06 2011
New Revision: 180241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180241
Log:
Backport from mainline fix for PR target/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50106
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011-10-21
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org,
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-21
08:44:05 UTC
||2011-10-27
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-27
16:34:14 UTC ---
Confirmed .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-27
16:38:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 25635
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25635
testcase
bzipped testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50878
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-10-27
16:56:38 UTC ---
I see this with 180560 FYI.
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50886
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #13 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-11-02 11:40:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Please tell me this bug is fixed in gcc 4.6.2 release? If this is fixed in
> gcc4.6.2 release can I use the fix patch into gcc 4.6-linaro?
>
> Than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50968
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at gcc dot |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24234|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53278
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-08
14:56:18 UTC ---
The patch below appears to trigger the issue but there's a fundamental question
as to why lower-subreg generates concatns when the documentation suggests that
concat and concatn
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-14
11:40:08 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-05/msg00325
||2012-05-14
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-14
11:42:53 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk so far. Any plans of backporting this to 4.7 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52989
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53376
Bug #: 53376
Summary: Unrecognizable compare insn generated by movsicc in
arm backend.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53376
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-16
23:23:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > extern int x;
> > static long long p;
> > static long long *h1 ;
> > static long long *h2 ;
> >
> > void foo (void)
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53334
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-05-22
09:07:03 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue May 22 09:06:55 2012
New Revision: 187761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187761
Log:
Fix PR target/53334
2012-05-22 Ramana Ra
||2012-05-22
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-05-22 14:16:34 UTC ---
> There are still a few vmov's between Vector registers but I suspect that is
> because of the vcombine at the end for which RichardE might have something in
> flight.
This i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53558
Bug #: 53558
Summary: Register allocator doesn't tie return value register
to output variable.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #26 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-06-14 11:22:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> (In reply to comment #21)
> > What does it mean "exercise the backend a lot"? Do you mean it takes a lot
> > of
> > time?
>
> I think so.
>
> > I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-06-15
00:51:26 UTC ---
With -fno-split-wide-types I can end up getting identical output to what is
expected in this case with FSF trunk. I suspect this might be another of those
costs with lower-subre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-06-15 16:43:44 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jun 15 16:43:36 2012
New Revision: 188671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188671
Log:
2012-06-15 Marc Glisse
PR c++/510
||2012-06-20
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org,
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-06-20
10:16:28 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-06-20
14:59:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Two scan-assembler directives with the same search string don't look for two
> instances of the same string, they just look for the same thing twice a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #28 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-06-27 14:19:25 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Jun 27 14:19:17 2012
New Revision: 189017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189017
Log:
2012-06-27 Ramana Radhakrishnan
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-05
16:45:29 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:45:18 2012
New Revision: 189294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189294
Log:
2012-07-05 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-05
16:45:32 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:45:18 2012
New Revision: 189294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189294
Log:
2012-07-05 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-07-05 16:56:23 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:56:15 2012
New Revision: 189295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189295
Log:
Correct bug number to PR target/48941
F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2012-07-12
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53352
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53735
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|assemble-failure|
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
Bug #: 54051
Summary: Invalid alignment specifier generated for vld3_lane_*
and vld3_dup_* intrinsics.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-24
12:02:37 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Jul 24 12:02:30 2012
New Revision: 189808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189808
Log:
Fix PR target/54051
2012-07-24 Ramana R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
--- Comment #3 from Ramana R
||2012-07-24
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-24
13:03:00 UTC ---
on trunk with -O2 -g -gdwarf-3 I can reproduce the ICE .
{dw_attr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-30
18:30:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Tests gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/neon/v*.c are generated by the script
> gcc/config/arm/neon-testgen.ml. 54 of these tests have duplicate
> scan-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-31
00:00:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 27901
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27901
Tentative patch.
Tentative patch - has a few unneeded whitespace changes but probably fixes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-31
00:04:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thanks for looking, Ramana. I noticed in my investigation that the search
> string needs to be different for scan-assembler-times than for scan-assem
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2012-07-31
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.7.0, 4.7.1, 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48803
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.2, 4.7.0
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49169
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49437
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-31
01:05:18 UTC ---
Fixed only in 4.7.0
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-07-31
16:16:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> For some reason I couldn't apply the patch, but manually changed the tests to
> use { scan-assembler-times regexp 2 } instead of { scan assembler rege
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53664
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-07-31 17:56:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> For some reason I couldn't apply the patch, but manually changed the tests to
> use { scan-assembler-times regexp 2 } instead of { scan assembler re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51631
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2012-02-23
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.7.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.6.3
--- Comment #4 from Ramana
||2012-02-23
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-02-23
02:24:10 UTC ---
I suppose confirmed :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51835
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-02-24
12:24:04 UTC ---
Trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
--- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-02-28 16:09:52 UTC ---
I can confirm that a build for arm-linux-gnueabi completes and do some
cross-testing on qemu if that's deemed to be enough.
Any other ideas for testing.
Ramana
Here's a sug
||2012-02-29
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.7.0
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-02-29
11:41:00 UTC ---
Confirmed - looks
||2012-02-29
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-02-29
11:43:31 UTC ---
We manage to hoist this at O2 but not at Os in 4.7 while 4.6 appears to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-03-30
07:58:49 UTC ---
Your testcase is broken - it doesn't honour reinterpret_casts properly . This
is a better testcase.
#include
uint32x4_t sqrlen4D_16u8( const uint8x16_t A, const uint8x16_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51980
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-03-30
08:17:21 UTC ---
Experimenting with :
Applying the patch of PR48941 and the patch for lower-subreg here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01886.html
I now see : We still have too
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800
Bug #: 52800
Summary: eglibc build broken with internal compiler error in
cfgloop .
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-03-30
23:34:41 UTC ---
Richi - probably yours -
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@185913 broken
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@185910 good
regards,
Ramana
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 30954
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30954&action=edit
pre-processed file from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-none-linux-gnueabi,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 8 08:34:28 2013
New Revision: 203269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58619
2013-10-08 Dehao Chen
* tree-inl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2013-10-29
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.7.3
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.8.0, 4.8.1, 4.9.0
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #3)
> Confirmed. The problem appears to show up with the use of mapcs on the
> command line. Mine.
sched2 moves this ahead - smells familiar.
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 31105
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31105&action=edit
lightly tested patch.
completely untested but appears to fix the problem - Ben, can you please try
this pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Oct 30 10:54:04 2013
New Revision: 204203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204203&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/58854
2013-10-30 Ramana Radhakrishnan
PR targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58847
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed, presumably.
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-10-30
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.7.3, 4.8.0, 4.8.1, 4.9.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-10-31
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-10-31
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.9.0
--- Comment #9 from Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 31116
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31116&action=edit
reduced testcase.
,
|sparc-sun-solaris2.11 |sparc-sun-solaris2.11
|sh*-*-* |sh*-*-*,arm-none-eabi,arm-n
||one-linux-gnueabihf
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 31121
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31121&action=edit
arm-none-eabi reduced testcase
./cc1 -O2 -g -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp reduced.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Nov 11 09:38:14 2013
New Revision: 204665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport fix for PR target/58854
2013-11-11 Ramana Radhakrishnan
||2013-11-22
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
We'll look into fixing this for 4.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
101 - 200 of 1217 matches
Mail list logo
