reconfirmed||2013-02-19
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2013-02-19
23:36:08 UTC ---
As per comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56091
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2013-02-20
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2013-02-20
00:13:53 UTC ---
confirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55068
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resoluti
reconfirmed||2013-03-15
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2013-03-15
18:42:18 UTC ---
as per comment #c1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2013-03-22 09:59:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> In case this won't be fixed in 4.6, then it is probably good to set the status
> to WONTFIX so people know that they have to deal with this o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resoluti
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57256
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2012-08-10
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-10
14:57:32 UTC ---
shows
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-10
14:58:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> shows up on 4.7 branch but latent on trunk.This has been marked predicable
> ever
> since the port was submitted and this is just broken.
>
> None o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-15
07:56:48 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Aug 15 07:56:41 2012
New Revision: 190407
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190407
Log:
Fix PR target/54212
2012-08-15 Ramana Rad
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2012-08-15
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-15
11:00:53 UTC ---
hmmm MEM_SIZE for the offending load appears to be 32 bytes. Something is fishy
here.
vld1.32 {d16}, [r3:128]! <= Offending load
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-15
11:18:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> hmmm MEM_SIZE for the offending load appears to be 32 bytes. Something is
> fishy
> here.
>
> vld1.32 {d16}, [r3:128]! <= Offending load
(insn 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-15
13:03:41 UTC ---
That ain't the root cause and that patch should really not be applied.
The problem really is in neon_dereference_pointer where we expand such builtins
- that's the one that is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm-linux-gnueabi, arm-eabi
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-20
10:18:41 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Aug 20 10:18:36 2012
New Revision: 190527
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190527
Log:
Fix PR target/54212
2012-08-20 Ramana Rad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Raman
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-30
10:17:08 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Aug 30 10:17:04 2012
New Revision: 190800
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190800
Log:
Fix PR target/54252
2012-08-29 Ramana Rad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-30
10:21:59 UTC ---
Fixed now I believe on trunk.
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-09-04
19:37:34 UTC ---
Problem is because the input is invalid . We just end up generating
ldrex r0, [r1, #-24] .
asm volatile
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-09-04
19:42:16 UTC ---
dup of 45070
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 45070 ***
||2012-09-04
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
||2012-09-04
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45070
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2012-09-04
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-09-04
19:51:07 UTC ---
Someone needs to tell the linker to garbage
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2012-09-04
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.7.1, 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-09-04
23:06:29 UTC ---
Oh I see, my bad to have missed your command line. Sorry.
I see what's going on here. It's just luck that this works on x86_64 with your
invocation.
>$ objdump -h non-coll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-09-07 09:32:00 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Sep 7 09:31:54 2012
New Revision: 191059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191059
Log:
Fix PR target/54252
2012-09-07 Ramana Ra
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
||2012-10-23
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Bug #: 55050
Summary: Regression test failure slp-21.c on arm-linux-gnueabi
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
Bug #: 55052
Summary: [4.8 regression] vect-widening tests are failing and
giving wrong results
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm-linux-gnueabi
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2010-12-24
11:04:08 UTC ---
Ok I'll test this. (In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 22835 [details]
> gcc46-pr45701.patch
>
> Remembering pointers to tail call insns is both wasteful (allocates s
||2011.01.05 11:46:14
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46715
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
||2011.01.15 15:50:48
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-01-15
15:50:48 UTC ---
Confirmed : For the record the command line options are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-01-19
10:39:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> On IRC you've mentioned some TLS test issues, were they caused by this patch
> or
> unrelated?
Sorry about the delay in responding. With trunk I see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44392
--- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-01-25 07:18:09 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Jan 25 07:18:05 2011
New Revision: 169221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169221
Log:
2011-01-21 Ramana Radhakrishnan
Ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44392
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45447
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Summary: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer
for pr42918.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
Summary: [4.6 regression] -flto -flto-partition=none broken for
arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #14 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-02-01 01:10:53 UTC ---
Now fixed I think looking at the output from trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2011.02.01 01:19:27
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-02-01
01:19:27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47562
Summary: Meta bug to keep track of Neon enhancements.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Componen
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-02-01
01:46:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This requires scheduling the code better.
What do you mean here ? Is
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed||2011.02.27 23:12:50
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-02-27
23:27:11 UTC ---
This has been fixed on trunk and will be in the 4.6.0 release.
With this commit
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-05
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19599
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57340
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
I'll take a look.
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57340
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at ispras dot ru
--- Commen
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
duplicate
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 57340 ***
||2013-05-22
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57340
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2013-05-24
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
||2013-07-05
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|target |tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57462
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2013-07-10
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
confirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57731
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
fixed.
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-07-10
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57837
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57731
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58014
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
No access to any hppa machine for me to consider reproducing the issue and the
compile farm machines are down.
I did do some work in this area a year ago but I don't have any commits in the
range men
||2013-08-05
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2013-08-05
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Is this now fixed by
http://gcc.gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-08-05
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-08-05
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|target |middle-end
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Duplicate of 50099.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 50099 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50099
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patenaude at gmail dot com
--- Com
||2013-08-05
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
On AArch64 with no strict alignment we end up generating with .002t.original
trunk
{
T tmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58065
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
4.3 is no longer interesting and this is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48250
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||4.7.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|ramana at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Known to fail||4.6.4
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58065
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-08-08
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
fixed for 4.8.0
||2013-08-14
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2013-08-28
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.6.0, 4.7.0, 4.8.0
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2011-08-17
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.6.1, 4.7.0
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50150
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
*-*-*,
||arm-linux-gnueabi
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2011-09-06
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50099
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at gcc dot |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50022
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 1217 matches
Mail list logo