--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-21
20:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members
On Jun 21, 2005, at 4:43 PM, bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From bange
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-22
19:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE in first_vi_for_offset, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:2506
On Jun 22, 2005, at 2:59 PM, bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From b
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-24
15:42 ---
Subject: Re: New: #if #A == #B should have a diagnostic
On Jun 23, 2005, at 10:04 PM, geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> GCC quietly accepts the following:
>
> #define A a
> #define
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-27
16:53 ---
Subject: Re: numeric_limits::is_modulo is inconsistend with gcc
On Jun 27, 2005, at 12:25 PM, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote:
> | Actually it is modulo for all operations.
>
> Bu
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-05
17:13 ---
Subject: Re: Many attribute directive ignored warnings during Tru64 UNIX Ada
bootstrap
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 17:11
> ---
>
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-05
17:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Ada does not build into a clean prefix when
unwind.h is not installed
On Jul 5, 2005, at 10:19 AM, pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> The other alternative is
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-11
14:17 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3142
On Jul 11, 2005, at 6:47 AM, reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Do you want to add this as a testcase, since the one in PR22356
>
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-20
19:11 ---
Subject: Re: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to
".rodata" section?
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> - given that 4.1'
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-23
22:54 ---
Subject: Re: ICE / ada / error in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:557
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-23 22:45
> ---
> detailed backtrace:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-24
15:13 ---
Subject: Re: ICE / ada / error in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:557
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-24 15:10
> ---
> with pinskia1.patc
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-26
20:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] wrong alias information causes an incorrect
redundant load elimination
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-31
16:56 ---
Subject: Re: [Bug gcov/profile/12786] -fvpt does not work with signed mod or
signed divide with a constant negative number
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From veksler at il dot ibm dot
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-31
18:57 ---
Subject: Re: building GCC 3.3.6 fails on ppc64 with gcc4 and gcc4.1
> $ touch ../gcc-3.3.6/gcc/c-gperf.h (don't know why this done by the way..)
> $ make all-target-libstdc++-v3
> LIBPATH
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-01
18:34 ---
Subject: Re: MAXPATHLEN usage in fortran/{scanner,module}.c
On Aug 1, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:46:17PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
> org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-02
14:32 ---
Subject: Re: Improve documentation on -fprofile-generate, -fprofile-use
On Aug 2, 2005, at 10:25 AM, anton at samba dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From anton at samba dot org 2
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-05
01:35 ---
Subject: Re: New: Invalid %sil register chosen when dereferenced pointer used
in inline asm with -O0
On Aug 4, 2005, at 8:32 PM, ianw at gelato dot unsw dot edu dot au
wrote:
> /* this
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-09
13:40 ---
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector,
std::vector)
> This is reasonable. That was why I thought it was not necessary to `fix'
> this
> bug after s
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-10
02:49 ---
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector,
std::vector)
On Aug 9, 2005, at 10:41 PM, adah at netstd dot com wrote:
>
> Passing this information to the user i
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-11
17:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Wrong code from forwprop
On Aug 11, 2005, at 1:43 PM, rguenth at tat dot physik dot
uni-tuebingen dot de wrote:
> because else we might get f.i. LE_EXPR passing thro
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-12
02:14 ---
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector,
std::vector)
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From adah at netstd dot com 2005-08-12 02:10
> ---
> (In
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-12
02:38 ---
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector,
std::vector)
On Aug 11, 2005, at 10:32 PM, adah at netstd dot com wrote:
> What I have not is that a PRoblem resulting
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-13
21:44 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0.x regression] Generates wrong code for funcptr comparison
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:42 PM, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From danglin at g
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-14
03:48 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] tree-ssa-alias creates a new virtual variable
for malloc each time may_alias is run (HEAP)
On Aug 13, 2005, at 11:40 PM, dberlin at dberlin dot org wrote:
> Uh, so?
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-15
12:09 ---
Subject: Re: alignment bug in libobjc/archive.c
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From rassahah at neofonie dot de 2005-08-15
> 10:41 ---
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Hmm
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-16
18:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: vector::clear should be manually inlined
>
> vector::clear calls erase(begin(), end()), which has an unnecessary call to
> memmove, in addition to a function call overhead
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-16
20:07 ---
Subject: Re: libstdc++ fails to link with std::string on AIX
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From appfault at hotmail dot com 2005-08-16
> 20:03 ---
> I compiled 4.0.1 using
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-16
21:10 ---
Subject: Re: New: Operations involving unsigneds could be simplified
>
> This could just return 1.
>
> $ cat unsigned-arith.c
> int foo(unsigned int *a, unsigned int *b,
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-16
21:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE in cgraph_decide_inlining_incrementally
(using freed GC memory)
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From e9925248 at stud4 dot tuwien dot ac dot at
> 2
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-22
18:26 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on correct code
On Aug 22, 2005, at 2:18 PM, paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr wrote:
>
> PS peshtigo?
I don't know where it comes from for this machine, as I did not nam
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-23
18:07 ---
Subject: Re: bigger version of mov + cmp produced
On Aug 23, 2005, at 2:06 PM, dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics d
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-24
23:35 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr18122.f90
On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:26 PM, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
> 2005-08
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-25
15:53 ---
Subject: Re: nonoverlapping_memrefs_p returns true even for overlapping memory
references
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-25
> 15:47 ---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-26
04:26 ---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 04:24
> ---
>
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-26
14:24 ---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
On Aug 26, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Nathan M wrote:
>> do build it this way: gcj HelloWorld.java --main=
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-26
18:37 ---
Subject: Re: gcc doesn't compile the stl headers
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From jacob dot navia at ants dot com 2005-08-26
> 18:31 ---
> Subject: RE: gcc doe
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-28
23:32 ---
Subject: Re: java.lang.String.equals is suboptimal
On Aug 28, 2005, at 7:25 PM, greenrd at greenrd dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From greenrd at greenrd dot org
> 2005-08
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29
05:19 ---
Subject: Re: Missed ccp optimization
On Aug 29, 2005, at 1:18 AM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
> 2005-08
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29
20:01 ---
Subject: Re: gcc doesn't compile the stl headers
On Aug 29, 2005, at 3:59 PM, jacob dot navia at ants dot com wrote:
>
> OK?
>
> Should we file a new bug report?
Yes but this is mos
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29
21:32 ---
Subject: Re: Typeinfo comparison code easily breaks shared libs
On Aug 29, 2005, at 5:27 PM, mmarcus at emarcus dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From mmarcus at emarcus dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29
23:01 ---
Subject: Re: -Wsign-compare and const propagation
On Aug 29, 2005, at 6:24 PM, br1 at internet dot com dot uy wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From br1 at internet dot com dot uy
> 2
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-21 07:19 ---
Subject: Re: New: GCC rejects the following strictly conforming code with
-ansi -pedantic errors
>
> void foo (const int (*h)[2], int (*i)[2])
> {
> 1 ? h: i;
> }
>
> Also rejected in C99 mode.
ICC warns:
t.c
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 18:13 ---
Subject: Re: -Wpointer-sign creates problems for Emacs
>
>
>
> --- Comment #3 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 18:12
> ---
> Created an attachment (id=10728)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 00:59 ---
Subject: Re: FORTRAN segfault
>
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-31 00:45 ---
> This code is extracted from a much larger program. Intel FORTRAN compiler
> has no problem with it.
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 01:15 ---
Subject: Re: FORTRAN segfault
On Jan 30, 2006, at 7:45 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> Intel FORTRAN compiler has no problem with it.
Intel's Fortran compiler does not detect a lot of
invalid code, that does no
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-02 14:42 ---
Subject: Re: error and warning count
>
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from hyperquantum at gmail dot com 2006-02-02 14:39
> ---
> IMO this is a useful feature because the number of lines of error output that
> G
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 00:27
---
Subject: Re: gcc lays down two copies of constructors
On Feb 4, 2006, at 7:20 PM, ian at airs dot com wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #20 from ian at airs dot com 2006-02-05 00:19 ---
> In many common cases,
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 19:08 ---
Subject: Re: Extraneous warning with __builtin_stdarg_start and optimization
> --- Comment #5 from James dot Juran at baesystems dot com 2006-02-13
> 19:06 ---
> Yes, that does seem to be the case based o
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-05 18:03 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1]: libmudflap failures on ia64
On Mar 5, 2006, at 1:00 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-05 18:00 ---
> std::ios_base::_S_local_word_
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 14:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] warning with cross build
>
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2006-03-06
> 14:35 ---
> Subject: Re: New: [4.2 Regression] warning with cr
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 19:07 ---
Subject: Re: Cannot find libgomp.spec after 'make install' on x86_64 and ppc64
>
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 19:05 ---
> I can reproduce the runtime error, but not
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-10 13:58 ---
Subject: Re: Template instantiation fails for -O1 -finline-functions
> However, this doesn't explain, why the reference to
> TTypeWrapper::~TTypeWrapper
> is missing if the instance of CVectorWrap is allocated sta
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 18:57 ---
Subject: Re: boostrap failure due to warning in gcc/varasm.c
On Mar 14, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Graham Stott wrote:
> All,
>
> If the warning isn't bogus then we probably need to do the shift in
> two steps
> (i.e. hw
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 23:33
---
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] Gfortran can't compile tonto
On Mar 15, 2006, at 6:28 PM, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-03-15 23:28 ---
> (In reply to comment
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-16 23:54
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: Gcc generates unaligned access
On Mar 16, 2006, at 6:37 PM, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #12 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-03-16 23:37
> ---
> (In re
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-17 00:40
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: Gcc generates unaligned access
On Mar 16, 2006, at 7:37 PM, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #15 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-03-17 00:37
> ---
> Both a
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-17 01:12
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression]: Gcc generates unaligned access
On Mar 16, 2006, at 8:06 PM, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> --- Comment #17 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-03-17 01:06
> ---
> PPC does no
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-17 21:19 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GCC cannot bootstrap on IA64 HP-UX
On Mar 17, 2006, at 4:16 PM, mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have access to HP-UX and the bug doesn't appear
> o
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-22 06:29 ---
Subject: Re: Checking for gthread causes configure script to fail
On Mar 22, 2006, at 1:27 AM, issac dot trotts at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> Sure, but it doesn't tell you what to do if the configure script fails
>
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-23 14:54
---
Subject: Re: EQUIVALENCE broken in 32-bit code with optimization -O2
On Mar 23, 2006, at 3:06 AM, paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot
fr wrote:
>
> I thought to take a look at the patch tonight; does it loo
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-04-24
18:10 ---
Subject: Re: Generates unneeded test
On Apr 24, 2005, at 2:06 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> What is the type of 'i'? If it's unsigned, then we would be
> wasting our time.
It is
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-02
05:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] very long compile times with large cpp file
from kdebindings
On May 1, 2005, at 11:33 PM, belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
wrote:
> (though profile s
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-05
18:41 ---
Subject: Re: wrong-code with inlining and type-punned pointer
On May 5, 2005, at 1:19 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-05
20:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] ivopts produces code that generates
"unaligned access exception"
On May 5, 2005, at 4:03 PM, tsv at solvo dot ru wrote:
> I am trying to find out wh
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-14
07:04 ---
Subject: Re: Segfault while compiling
libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
On May 14, 2005, at 3:00 AM, corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> * f95 disqualifies ifselves from seve
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-14
07:08 ---
Subject: Re: Segfault while compiling
libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
On May 14, 2005, at 3:00 AM, corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> * f95 disqualifies ifselves from seve
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-16
20:34 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl
On May 16, 2005, at 4:28 PM, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
>> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
&
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-16
21:07 ---
Subject: Re: Strange symbols printed all over the error messages
On May 16, 2005, at 5:04 PM, Yuri wrote:
> Agree, I must have wrong setting.
>
> But how does compiler with US English
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-18
21:00 ---
Subject: Re: no folding back to ARRAY_REF
On May 18, 2005, at 4:51 PM, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com
> 2005-05
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-05-21
22:32 ---
Subject: Re: wrong-code with inlining and type-punned pointer
On May 21, 2005, at 6:28 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-20
17:48 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] register window not preserved after
getcontext call
On Jun 20, 2005, at 1:46 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comment
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7123
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11434
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-07 17:13
---
The problem with 3.3 and AIX < 4.3.3 has been fixed for 3.3.1, can you try a snapshot?
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11523
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11606
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11730
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-08-04 18:18
---
*** Bug 11767 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2004-12-28
22:34 ---
Subject: Re: Error messages seem to be printed slower
On Dec 28, 2004, at 5:31 PM, schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de wrote:
>
> The call to setvbuf switches to line buffering, meaning that std
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2004-12-29
14:58 ---
Subject: Re: A derived template cannot access base templat e members without
using this
On Dec 29, 2004, at 9:54 AM, Amos Ortal wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for your fast reply, I saw
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-01-04
21:40 ---
Subject: Re: Bootstrap ignores compiler flags supplied on command line
On Jan 4, 2005, at 4:24 PM, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> gcc -c -g -DENABLE_CHECKING -DENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING -DIN_GCC
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-01-05
00:22 ---
Subject: Re: --disable-checking doesn't fully disable checking
On Jan 4, 2005, at 7:19 PM, gschafer at zip dot com dot au wrote:
> - C only bootstrap times on GCC-4 have almost exactly doubl
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-01-24
21:47 ---
Subject: Re: computed gotos are not folded back to regular gotos when it is
found that they are not computed gotos at all
On Jan 24, 2005, at 4:37 PM, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> Out of curios
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-02-10
03:45 ---
Subject: Re: Operation not supported while installing 4.0.0 on
apple-darmin-7.6.0.
On Feb 9, 2005, at 10:08 PM, peter at pogma dot com wrote:
> and that darwin's as has a write_object.c
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2004-11-03 15:08
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] jump threading on trees is slow with switch statements
with large # of cases
On Nov 3, 2004, at 10:03 AM, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>
> With loop bounds recording no
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-10-31 19:10
---
Subject: Re: Force core dump on runtime library errors
> - Support for coredumps (compile time? Environment variable? The latter
> overwriting the former?)
> [Advantage compile-time option: The core
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-11-30 00:03
---
Subject: Re: New: [4.3 Regression] segfault with
gcc.c-torture/compile/2804-1.c on sh-elf
>
> sh-elf compiler segfaults with a null argument for emit_move_insn
> when compiling gcc.c-tortur
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-11-30 21:23
---
Subject: Re: sqrt(CGAMMA*PRES[j]/DENS[j]) much slower than compiting compiler
>
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 21:14
> ---
> > Also you ar
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-12-01 00:05
---
Subject: Re: Clarify gcc jc1 cc1 cc1plus installation problem No such file or
directory error
>
> --- Comment #4 from jg at jguk dot org 2006-12-01 00:00 ---
> Hi, Thanks for your reply.
>
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-12-01 03:32
---
Subject: Re: integer division by zero in subexpression should be overflow
> Hi Manual,
>
> This needs to be handled in the front-ends, and in fact is already handled
^
should
>
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2007-01-16 03:48
---
Subject: Re: Integer Overflow detection code optimised away, -fwrapv broken
> Subject: Re: Integer Overflow detection code optimised away,
> -fwrapv broken
> >> Especially you as the au
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2007-01-23 00:29
---
Subject: Re: -Wno-deprecated needed also for C
> manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> > --- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 00:01
> > ---
> > The testca
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2007-01-23 15:50
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
>
>
>
> --- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 15:47
> ---
> which revision is that? -r121081 fa
101 - 191 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
