https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at lekensteyn dot nl
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at lekensteyn dot nl
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68270
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at lekensteyn dot nl
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77267
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at lekensteyn dot nl
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530
Peter Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at lekensteyn dot nl
--- Comment #1
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: peter at lekensteyn dot nl
When an anonymous structure gets initialized, gcc always starts complaining
about the last field:
//
gcc -Wextra warn.c
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: peter at lekensteyn dot nl
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
While trying
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #3 from Peter Wu ---
GCC 4.9.2 cannot include the headers, it blows up on lines such as:
In file included from
/usr/lib/clang/3.5.1/include/sanitizer/common_interface_defs.h:16:0,
from
/usr/lib/clang/3.5.1/include/san
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #5 from Peter Wu ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #4)
> I think I know what your problem is.
> In C, the globals by default have common linkage and asan does not
> instrument them at all and thus can not properly repo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #7 from Peter Wu ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #6)
> > How does your GCC behave with the test case? The sanitizer code in GCC is
> > imported from Clang, I believe, so it probably does not crash either?
>
> I get th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65285
--- Comment #9 from Peter Wu ---
Tested with
clang version 3.7.0 (http://llvm.org/git/clang.git
6b7e300a9c14a2ff364d8ef8a0f7510378f38dbc) (http://llvm.org/git/llvm
258b7710d59c086656f7b26f02326d7ca69d71fd)
(http://llvm.org/git/compiler-rt.git 70
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: peter at lekensteyn dot nl
While trying to track down a weird crash in libunwind, I found that the library
I was debugging (libgudev-1.0.so.0.2.0) has a weird .eh_frame. I could minimize
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64046
--- Comment #2 from Peter Wu ---
Since it is only reproducible with ld.gold, I have duplicated the report at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17639
What about the application of optimization? Doesn't that have something to do
with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784
--- Comment #7 from Peter Wu ---
This bug is still present in GCC 4.9.2 and 4.9.3 (prerelease 20141210). Now
building gcc-5-20141207 to verify. (Not sure whether this gets backported to
4.9.x, just checking.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784
--- Comment #8 from Peter Wu ---
GCC 5 is OK, the question is whether 4.9 will or will not receive a fix?
15 matches
Mail list logo
