[Bug fortran/93833] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in trans_array_constructor, at fortran/trans-array.c:2566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93833 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93701] ICE on associate of wrongly accessed array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93701 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94246] [9/10 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90 since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/94386] [10 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr93365.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0) > commit 7d57570b0658b8c1b8a97dafa53dfd4ab4bd3f65 > Author: Paul Thomas > Date: Sat Mar 28 19:11:35 2020 + > > Patch for PR94246 Since the ICE occurs in primar

[Bug fortran/94386] [10 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr93365.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #4) > The problem is definitely caused by > > g:7d57570b0658b8c1b8a97dafa53dfd4ab4bd3f65, r10-7444 > > I built it before and no problems, errors after. I am utterly perp

[Bug fortran/94386] [10 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr93365.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- > > These were both clean builds run on a powerpc64 power8 LE machine. > > The patch committed to fix(?) PR94246 reverted the code that fixed > PR93665 and PR93600 without removing the now failing testcases a

[Bug fortran/94386] [10 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr93365.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to markeggleston from comment #12) > Created attachment 48155 [details] > Proposed fix > > Sorry for the duplicate (PR94430) I missed this PR. > > The cause of the errors messages is due to most of

[Bug fortran/94599] New: Invalid constructor for derived types with recursive allocatable components

: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 48271 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48271&action=edit A kludge to

[Bug testsuite/94725] Tests with proprietary license notices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94725 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93956] Wrong array creation with p => array_dt(1:n)%component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93956 --- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Thomas, I am sorry that you are having such a hassle with this - perhaps this helps? > > I assume that the span is not used correctly in the > function. Yes, that is correct. Within 'foo', we have

[Bug fortran/93581] [9 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_dataptr_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:6951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93581 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) > Patch was submitted at > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-March/054050.html > > And committed as r10-7081-g9de42a8e995451cb13dceb3970ae23ff88240bff > [

[Bug testsuite/94725] Tests with proprietary license notices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94725 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31e6f8293362979aea53b5cae3fa6ab0b6981694 commit r10-8064-g31e6f8293362979aea53b5cae3fa6ab0b6981694 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Thu Apr 30 09:56:01 2020 +0100 PR94725 - deleting gfor

[Bug fortran/83118] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #34 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #33) > What's going to happen with the fix? It works for me on > sparc-sun-solaris2.11 > and obviously several other targets. This has been open for months now with > a

[Bug analyzer/93993] ICE in make_region_for_unexpected_tree_code, at analyzer/region-model.cc:4786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 48935 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48935&action=edit Proposed patch for the PR I decided that the best way of proceeding was to correct the array spec and benefit fr

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #19) > The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5baf71b0a5bd79923c095cf81218b8194008f60 > > commit r11-2489-ga5baf71b0a5bd79923c095

[Bug fortran/96102] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.c:5994

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96102 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96312] [10/11 Regression] Reallocation on assignment uses undefined variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96312 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96101] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96101 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Started with r6-3986-g38217d3ee7c6e1fe. Hi Martin, As Gerhardt says, it compiles OK with version 7.4.1 20191027. The patch you reference is dated 2015-10-18! Che

[Bug fortran/96101] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96101 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96312] [10/11 Regression] Reallocation on assignment uses undefined variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96312 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/96728] Fatal Error: Reading module inquiry functions on assumed-rank

|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 49092

[Bug fortran/96726] ICE with user defined specification function on assumed-rank array

||2020-08-21 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 49093

[Bug fortran/96727] ICE with character length specified using specification function on assumed-rank array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96727 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug fortran/96737] ICE when compiling module and submodule in same file with debug (-g)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96737 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/92959] ICE in gfc_conv_associated, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:8634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92959 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/96728] Fatal Error: Reading module inquiry functions on assumed-rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96728 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96727] ICE with character length specified using specification function on assumed-rank array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96727 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96726] ICE with user defined specification function on assumed-rank array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96726 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96624] A segment fault occurred when using the reshape function result to assign a variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96624 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96624] A segment fault occurred when using the reshape function result to assign a variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96624 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/96495] [gfortran] Composition of user-defined operators does not copy ALLOCATABLE property of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96495 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96495] [gfortran] Composition of user-defined operators does not copy ALLOCATABLE property of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96495 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- The fix is submitted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-August/054945.html Regards Paul

[Bug fortran/97045] A wrong column is selected when addressing individual elements of unlimited polymorphic dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97045 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/91926] assumed rank optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91926 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Oct 19 16:44:06 2019 New Revision: 277204 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277204&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/91926 * runtime/ISO_Fo

[Bug libfortran/92027] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_10.f90 FAILs – conditional jump based on uninitialized memory in runtime/ISO_Fortran_binding.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92027 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86248] [7/8/9/10 Regression] LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86248] [7/8/9/10 Regression] LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Oct 27 15:00:54 2019 New Revision: 277487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277487&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86248 * resolve.c (fla

[Bug fortran/86248] [7/8/9/10 Regression] LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Oct 27 16:21:36 2019 New Revision: 277488 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277488&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-27 Paul Thomas Backport from mainline PR fortran

[Bug fortran/86248] [7/8/9/10 Regression] LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Oct 27 17:06:38 2019 New Revision: 277489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277489&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-27 Paul Thomas Backport from mainline PR fortra

[Bug fortran/86248] [7/8/9/10 Regression] LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Oct 27 18:28:52 2019 New Revision: 277490 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277490&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-27 Paul Thomas Backport from mainline PR fortra

[Bug fortran/86248] [7/8/9/10 Regression] LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86248 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/91926] assumed rank optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91926 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 28 18:28:48 2019 New Revision: 277531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277531&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-10-28  Paul Thomas   Backport from trunk PR fortran/91

[Bug fortran/91926] assumed rank optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91926 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92123] [F2018/array-descriptor] Scalar allocatable/pointer with array descriptor (via bind(C)): ICE with select rank or error scalar variable with POINTER or ALLOCATABLE in procedure wit

||2019-11-03 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 47158 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47158&action=edit A dr

[Bug fortran/92123] [F2018/array-descriptor] Scalar allocatable/pointer with array descriptor (via bind(C)): ICE with select rank or error scalar variable with POINTER or ALLOCATABLE in procedure wit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Nov 10 18:33:00 2019 New Revision: 278025 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278025&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-11-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/92123 *decl.c (gfc_ver

[Bug fortran/92123] [F2018/array-descriptor] Scalar allocatable/pointer with array descriptor (via bind(C)): ICE with select rank or error scalar variable with POINTER or ALLOCATABLE in procedure wit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 47258 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47258&action=edit Patch to fix problem with ISO_Fortran_binding_15.* Hi Jakub and Tobias, Restoring the call to trans-decl.c(conve

[Bug fortran/92123] [F2018/array-descriptor] Scalar allocatable/pointer with array descriptor (via bind(C)): ICE with select rank or error scalar variable with POINTER or ALLOCATABLE in procedure wit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92123 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 47261 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47261&action=edit A better fix Hi Jakub and Tobias, It turns out that the TREE_STATIC is only required for the gfc descriptor and

[Bug fortran/69654] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Dear Hossein, This news is probably 1,379 days too late for you - I am just about to post a fix for this bug. I do apologise for the long delay but, for some reason, I saw the problem right away today having f

[Bug fortran/64397] [OOP] Runtime segfault with parenthesis expression passed to polymorphic dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64397 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69654] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Nov 15 12:42:29 2019 New Revision: 278287 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278287&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-11-15 Paul Thomas PR fortran/69654 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #12) > Paul, getting back to this one? At first glance seems not overly much work > left for the remaining case. Hi Juergen, I am in the midst of a triage of my assign

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #13) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #12) snip > > It seems to me that what is true for an explicit save is true for an > implicit one too and that the

[Bug fortran/83118] [8/9/10 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #25 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #23) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #21) > > > Created attachment 46216 [details] > > > Patch for the remaining problems. > > I have the patch in my wo

[Bug fortran/83118] [8/9/10 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #26 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #25) > (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #23) > > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #21) > > > > Created attachment 46216 [details] > > > > Patch for th

[Bug fortran/91726] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #4) > This appears to be fixed on trunk. Since this is marked as a regression, > shall it be backported? Hi Harald, Yes it should. Unfortunately, I am working every waking ou

[Bug fortran/92753] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_call, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:392

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92753 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/92753] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_call, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:392

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92753 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 47497 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47497&action=edit Provisional patch for the PR The attached patch fixes the bugs in this PR. However, complex components of derived

[Bug fortran/92753] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_call, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:392

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92753 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Dec 21 16:19:42 2019 New Revision: 279696 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279696&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-12-21  Paul Thomas   PR fortran/92753 * expr.c (find_i

[Bug fortran/92753] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_call, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:392

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92753 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Dec 21 18:21:21 2019 New Revision: 279697 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279697&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-12-21  Paul Thomas   PR fortran/92753 * expr.c (find_

[Bug fortran/92753] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_call, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:392

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92753 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57710] [OOP] [F08] _vptr not set for allocatable CLASS component inside BLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57710 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83118] [8/9/10 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #28 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #27) > Thanks, Paul! We'll test the patch. > > Damian Hi Damian, What was the outcome of the test? I have spent much of today coming to grips with git and successfu

[Bug fortran/92785] expressions passed as real arguments to a dummy polymorphic argument fail with indexing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92785 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/92931] gfortran compiler errors

||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- In the absence of a response to Steve's reply of 13th December, I marking this as invalid and closing. Paul

[Bug fortran/92785] expressions passed as real arguments to a dummy polymorphic argument fail with indexing error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92785 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92959] ICE in gfc_conv_associated, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:8634

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92959 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/92976] [8/9/10 Regression][OOP] ICE in trans_associate_var, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:1963

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92976 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/83118] [8/9/10 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #30 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #29) > Hi Paul, > > The test case works with your patch applied. Thanks! > > Damian Hi Damian, I need to digest https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-11/msg00098.html

[Bug fortran/93581] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_dataptr_offset, at fortran/trans-array.c:6951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93581 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/93794] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at fortran/trans-expr.c:2497

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2013-02-04 22:33:19 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 4 22:33:15 2013 New Revision: 195741 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195741 Log: 2013-02-04 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/47517] [F03] Reallocate on assignment: Segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47517 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas 2013-02-04 22:33:19 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 4 22:33:15 2013 New Revision: 195741 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195741 Log: 2013-02-04 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47517] [F03] Reallocate on assignment: Segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47517 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2013-02-06 20:20:24 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Wed Feb 6 20:20:08 2013 New Revision: 195815 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195815 Log: 2013-02-06 Paul Thomas PR fortran

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression]

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2013-02-09 09:49:52 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 9 09:49:49 2013 New Revision: 195915 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195915 Log: 2013-02-09 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2013-02-09 20:33:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29406 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29406 Draft patch for the PR This turned out to be easier than I expected. It obviously needs a bi

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2013-03-10 13:24:10 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 10 13:23:58 2013 New Revision: 196580 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196580 Log: 2013-03-10 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] An |[4.6/4.7 Regression] An

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2013-03-10 18:34:35 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 10 18:34:24 2013 New Revision: 196582 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196582 Log: 2013-03-10 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2013-03-10 20:14:57 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 10 20:14:48 2013 New Revision: 196583 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196583 Log: 2013-03-10 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas 2013-03-10 21:02:52 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Mar 10 21:02:44 2013 New Revision: 196584 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196584 Log: 2013-03-10 Paul Thomas PR fortr

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6/4.7 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2013-03-13 05:32:15 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 13 05:32:07 2013 New Revision: 196627 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196627 Log: 2013-03-13 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2013-03-13 06:36:10 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 13 06:36:02 2013 New Revision: 196628 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196628 Log: 2013-03-13 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/56575] [4.6 Regression] An invalid OO code causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56575 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56496] [OOP] [F08] ICE with TYPE(*) coarray and SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56496 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46897] [OOP] type-bound defined ASSIGNMENT(=) not used for derived type component in intrinsic assign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug fortran/47051] [4.6 Regression] wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/46818] [4.6 Regression] ICE on pointer assignment (-fwhole-file)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/47051] [4.6 Regression] Wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/47204] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE: SIGSEGV in gfc_free_namespace (symbol.c:3323) on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47204 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/46896] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong code with transpose(a) passed to subroutine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas 2011-01-08 19:17:06 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat Jan 8 19:17:03 2011 New Revision: 168600 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168600 Log: 2011-01-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/46896

[Bug fortran/47051] [4.6 Regression] Wrong reallocate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas 2011-01-09 21:02:50 UTC --- Created attachment 22936 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22936 This patch fixes the PR I need to go through this with a fine toothed comb. It regtests OK and repre

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >