[Bug tree-optimization/27779] New: ICE at tree-data-ref.c:2335 when using -ftree-vectorize

e-vectorize Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: p dot vanhoof at oma dot be http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug tree-optimization/27779] ICE at tree-data-ref.c:2335 when using -ftree-vectorize

--- Comment #1 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2006-05-27 12:55 --- Created an attachment (id=11518) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11518&action=view) code that triggers the ICE -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27779

[Bug tree-optimization/27779] ICE at tree-data-ref.c:2335 when using -ftree-vectorize

--- Comment #3 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2006-05-27 17:21 --- This bug is specific to x86_64. The "long i, j" in the code is essential in reproducing this problem (with "int i, j" there will be no ICE). Hence the behavior is platform specific. -- http://

[Bug tree-optimization/41008] New: ICE in vect_is_simple_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:1708

t tree-vect- loop.c:1708 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: p dot vanhoof

[Bug tree-optimization/41008] ICE in vect_is_simple_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:1708

--- Comment #1 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2009-08-08 10:46 --- Created an attachment (id=18328) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18328&action=view) the code that fails. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41008

[Bug c++/35149] ICE: in expand_call_inline, at tree-inline.c:2653

--- Comment #1 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2008-02-09 19:11 --- Created an attachment (id=15124) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15124&action=view) test case that fails -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35149

[Bug c++/35149] New: ICE: in expand_call_inline, at tree-inline.c:2653

RMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: p dot vanhoof at oma dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35149

[Bug c++/41273] New: ICE in add_virtual_operand, at tree-ssa-operands.c:638

Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: p dot vanhoof at oma dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41273

[Bug c++/41273] ICE in add_virtual_operand, at tree-ssa-operands.c:638

--- Comment #1 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2009-09-05 10:20 --- Created an attachment (id=18502) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18502&action=view) code that fails -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41273

[Bug tree-optimization/42326] [4.5 Regression][graphite] segfault in tree-data-ref.c with Graphite building 200.sixtrack

--- Comment #9 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2010-02-27 13:53 --- The following Lagrange interpolation routine crashes the trunk > gcc -O1 -floop-parallelize-all -c bug.c bug.c: In function ‘lagrange’: bug.c:1:8: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault ... etc. > gcc -v

[Bug tree-optimization/42326] [4.5 Regression][graphite] segfault in tree-data-ref.c with Graphite building 200.sixtrack

--- Comment #17 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2010-03-07 14:12 --- The test case in comment #9 has only been fixed on the graphite branch, but still crashes on the trunk as of r157255. Please reopen and fix this problem on the trunk. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug tree-optimization/23085] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Additional Comments From p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2005-07-26 19:37 --- Subject: Re: New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault This is a duplicate 23083 created by accident. My apologies. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23085

[Bug middle-end/32546] [4.3 Regression] 'warning: array subscript is above/below array bounds' on delete[]

--- Comment #5 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2007-11-18 18:17 --- I am not completely sure whether this is the same underlying problem, but I get a bogus warning "array subscript is above array bounds" with the code snippet below when compiled with gcc -c

[Bug bootstrap/34218] New: bootstrap of gcc 4.3.0 fails on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

64-unknown-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: p dot vanhoof at oma dot be GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34218

[Bug bootstrap/34218] bootstrap of gcc 4.3.0 fails on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

--- Comment #2 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2007-11-24 19:57 --- Actually it was LDFLAGS, inherited that from an old build and had completely forgotten about it. The build seems to be going fine now. My mistake, my apologies... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug libmudflap/29691] New: libmudflap misses buffer overrun in sprintf

ority: P3 Component: libmudflap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: p dot vanhoof at oma dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29691

[Bug libmudflap/29691] libmudflap misses buffer overrun in sprintf

--- Comment #1 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2006-11-02 18:47 --- Created an attachment (id=12537) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12537&action=view) preprocessed test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29691