http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #51 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04
20:08:34 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 4 20:08:29 2013
New Revision: 195735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195735
Log:
2013-02-04 Alexander P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #52 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04
21:07:42 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 4 21:07:35 2013
New Revision: 195737
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195737
Log:
2013-02-04 Alexander P
||FIXED
--- Comment #53 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-04
21:10:38 UTC ---
Committed revision 195737. :-) Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #54 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
22:36:28 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 11 22:36:23 2013
New Revision: 195956
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195956
Log:
2013-02-11 Alexander P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693
--- Comment #51 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
23:30:18 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 11 23:30:10 2013
New Revision: 195960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195960
Log:
/libgcc
2013-02-
||4.8.0
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #52 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11
23:36:32 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54117
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-17
15:55:25 UTC ---
Fixed the ChangeLog, thanks for spotting it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
--- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-17
16:21:39 UTC ---
I've sent a message to the gcc-patches list with a pointer to the gcc-patches
list for the work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54030
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46902
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45258
--- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10
19:41:42 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Jan 10 19:41:39 2011
New Revision: 168639
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168639
Log:
2010-08-17 Jack Howarth
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19162
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-14
21:50:17 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Jan 14 21:50:11 2011
New Revision: 168824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168824
Log:
PR 19162
* ob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41146
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18
20:06:17 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Tue Jan 18 20:06:13 2011
New Revision: 168960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168960
Log:
2011-01-18 Dominique d'Humie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44415
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
||2011.02.05 22:30:43
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #53 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-05
22:30:43 UTC ---
I think we should fix this by patching in a new linkage name for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #63 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07
20:41:54 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:41:50 2011
New Revision: 169902
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169902
Log:
PR target/47558
Add __iee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333
--- Comment #55 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07
20:52:39 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:52:33 2011
New Revision: 169903
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169903
Log:
PR target/42333
Add __iee
||4.6.0
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #56 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07
20:54:48 UTC ---
This has been fixed. See PR47558 for the full patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333
--- Comment #57 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07
20:56:32 UTC ---
I'll pre-approve a backport to 4.5.x if someone really wants it, should be very
safe.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #66 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07
21:46:12 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 7 21:46:10 2011
New Revision: 169905
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169905
Log:
2011-02-07 Iain Sandoe
P
||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.6.0
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #67 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07
21:49:16 UTC ---
Fixed, thanks everyone for all your hard work and insight.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-08
10:50:43 UTC ---
157762 seems to have new code that outputs a dwarf register number without
going though DWARF2_FRAME_REG_OUT which I think is wrong.
I fixed that and played around for a
||FIXED
--- Comment #51 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-13
01:48:26 UTC ---
Fixed. Thanks a ton Iain.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
--- Comment #53 from mrs at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
18:10:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 23415
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23415
darwin patch (moxie is unrelated)
Here is a darwin patch. Not my code, but i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
04:09:52 UTC ---
Ok, thanks.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 47822 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
04:09:52 UTC ---
*** Bug 47826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #21 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
21:38:23 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 21 21:38:21 2011
New Revision: 170376
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170376
Log:
PR target/47822
* confi
||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-01
08:07:08 UTC ---
I don't think this is waiting on anything anymore. It would be nice if someone
would check in the patch an unbreak the build, as it used to build.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57304
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57304
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57308
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57304
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, new theory. Does this patch fix it for you:
Index: varasm.c
===
--- varasm.c(revision 199270)
+++ varasm.c(working copy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks, how about this one?
Index: target.def
===
--- target.def(revision 199270)
+++ target.def(working copy)
@@ -225,7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes please. If you can run:
dwarfdump --eh-frame --verify file.o
on all the .o files and see if there are any more lurking in there. Any that
fail verification will need to be fixed, one way
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'll build my own tree, thanks. I was hoping that it was a singular issue and
we'd be done with it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
--- Comment #24 from mrs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #51 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31
17:48:05 UTC ---
So, I propose we fix this now and deal with any potential fallout later.
Slightly bug pushing, which I'm not terribly fond of, but, better than leaving
it sit. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31
17:55:19 UTC ---
I don't have a take on the best way to fix this. With that said, if you like
the last patch and it tests out, Ok.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
--- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-31
17:58:49 UTC ---
I don't have the regeneration environment for fixincludes, could you post the
patch with the regeneration bits in it and ask for approval?
||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-09
19:34:40 UTC ---
I think Jack says: I don't believe this bug exists any more...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
--- Comment #25 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25
20:07:26 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Tue Oct 25 20:07:19 2011
New Revision: 180445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180445
Log:
PR target/48851
* incl
||FIXED
--- Comment #26 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25
20:10:31 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.7.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50342
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-10
16:06:20 UTC ---
I'd disagree with that. I suspect 99% of them are not overridden, just like
99% of C functions are not weak and not overridden either. As for what should
be done, do
||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-10
16:10:12 UTC ---
:-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53283
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53453
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-29
23:44:13 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Tue May 29 23:44:09 2012
New Revision: 187994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187994
Log:
2012-05-29 Jack Howarth
||4.8.0
Resolution||FIXED
Known to fail||4.7.0
--- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-30
00:25:36 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07
18:17:33 UTC ---
Yes, love to see a patch. I think the argument is important to get right, as
otherwise the next bug to track down will be much harder to find (I call this
bug pushing). If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||FIXED
--- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-28
20:27:47 UTC ---
Fixed.
||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WORKSFORME
--- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-01
22:46:10 UTC ---
So, I'm worried that we lose the fix for this if we see it in the future.
Hopefully, it was just a bug that was fixed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02
18:21:47 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Mar 2 18:21:41 2012
New Revision: 184809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184809
Log:
2012-03-02 Jack Howarth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #29 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02
18:21:46 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Mar 2 18:21:41 2012
New Revision: 184809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184809
Log:
2012-03-02 Jack Howarth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-02
18:30:44 UTC ---
libjava is back to being pie in 4.6.4 and 4.7.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52665
--- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-27
18:01:13 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Tue Mar 27 18:01:06 2012
New Revision: 185889
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185889
Log:
PR target/52665
* gcc.tar
||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-27
18:02:08 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52781
Bug #: 52781
Summary: duplicate pass names, rtl dce
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #6 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-03
18:27:23 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
--- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-06
15:02:26 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Apr 6 15:02:21 2012
New Revision: 186194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186194
Log:
PR testsuite/50722
* gcc.dg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.1
--- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
--- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-06
15:35:59 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Apr 6 15:35:52 2012
New Revision: 186197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186197
Log:
PR testsuite/50722
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30957
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53107
Bug #: 53107
Summary: scheduling fail
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10901
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55517
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57258
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59043
--- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Dec 6 19:26:26 2013
New Revision: 205758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205758&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-06 Dominique d'Humieres
PR te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52794
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41090
--- Comment #23 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Dec 30 19:34:53 2013
New Revision: 206252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206252&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/41090
* g++.dg/ext/label13.C: Update to no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51349
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51349
--- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-04
07:34:32 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Sun Dec 4 07:34:25 2011
New Revision: 181984
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181984
Log:
2011-12-03 Dominique d'Humie
||FIXED
--- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-04
07:35:32 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51803
Bug #: 51803
Summary: gfortran getcwd at startup
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51803
--- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10
16:39:33 UTC ---
Mike Stump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51803
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-10
16:44:24 UTC ---
Oh, a related, but different bug would be, if getcwd isn't on the system, or
fails, I think "." might be better than "", as we form getcwd '/&#
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51842
Bug #: 51842
Summary: fortran fails if ssize_t is 32-bit on 64-bit host
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51842
--- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13
17:23:37 UTC ---
The last fix looks perfect, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10901
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113
--- Comment #38 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Thu Feb 8 18:39:43 2018
New Revision: 257500
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257500&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Mark previous change with:
PR target/84113
Modified:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113
--- Comment #39 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Thu Feb 8 18:48:37 2018
New Revision: 257501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-08 Iain Sandoe
PR targ
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
