[Bug c++/109030] [13 Regression] checking ICE in cxx_eval_call_expression with aggregate initialization inside noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107939] [11/12 Regression] Rejects use of `extern const` variable in a template since r11-557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107939 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression] Rejects

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 107939, which changed state. Bug 107939 Summary: [11 Regression] Rejects use of `extern const` variable in a template since r11-557 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107939 What|Removed

[Bug c++/107939] [11 Regression] Rejects use of `extern const` variable in a template since r11-557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107939 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108165] -Wdangling-reference false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108165 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/107079] [10/11 Regression] ICE initializing lifetime-extended constexpr variable that stores its this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107079 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/107023] [10/11/12 Regression] [[gnu::stdcall]] Crashes the compiler, but __attribute__((stdcall)) and __stdcall worrks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107023 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/78208] Compile-time hog with -fsanitize=null with operator overloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78208 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > I think the compile-hog would also be visible with -Wduplicated-branches, > but that's not in yet (and it's unclear whether it will make its way in to > GCC 7).

[Bug c++/67048] [10/11 Regression] GCC rejects well-formed program using empty anonymous enum specifier in a variable declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67048 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/91212] [10 Regression] const ignored for ctor arguments within return since r8-2493-g4ce8c5dea53d8073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91212 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/108880] [11 Regression] slow compilation with "-fsanitize=undefined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108880 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/103403] [11 Regression] auto return type with a trailing return type of decl(auto) uses rvalue reference type instead of reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103403 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87844] ICE in tsubst_copy using non-constant expression as a non-type template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87844 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/108060] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBsan missed an out-of-bound bug at -O0 since r7-1900-g8a1b7b7fd75a3847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Candidate fix: --- a/gcc/c-family/c-gimplify.cc +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-gimplify.cc @@ -106,6 +106,18 @@ ubsan_walk_array_refs_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *data) } else if (TREE_CODE (*tp) ==

[Bug c++/107280] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected constructor, have view_convert_expr in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:5928

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107280 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: tree check: expected |[10/11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug c++/107280] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected constructor, have view_convert_expr in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:5928

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107280 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- We crash in cxx_eval_store_expression. *valp for 'str', the VAR_DECL, used to be {.str=""} so in the !refs->is_empty () loop we'd go to the if (TREE_CODE (*valp) == STRING_CST) branch when processing the .s

[Bug c++/107280] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected constructor, have view_convert_expr in cxx_eval_store_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:5928

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107280 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/109090] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBSan signed integer overflow check missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109090 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug sanitizer/109090] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBSan signed integer overflow check missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109090 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r8-343-g2bf54d93f15921 it seems: commit 2bf54d93f159210d0c05a07c655eb847c069365c Author: Richard Biener Date: Tue May 2 12:43:47 2017 + common.opt (fstrict-overflow): Alias negative

[Bug sanitizer/109090] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBSan signed integer overflow check missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109090 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Dunno, this doesn't seem to be fixed by the patch in PR108995.

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Hmm, so it's this line const FrameMetadata::Plane &meta = buffer->metadata().planes()[i]; and we complain because we have libcamera::Span::operator[] (&TARGET_EXPR (buffer)>))>, (size_type) VIEW_CONVERT_

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 --- Comment #18 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16) > Span is a view, so it is like reference-wrapper. The lifetime of the > underlying data is not tied to the lifetime of the Span. Aha, I could add a check for

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 --- Comment #19 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Barnabás Pőcze from comment #17) > The simple test case with std::span still triggers the warning: > https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/43cKxdqr3. I feel that without deeper code > analysis such a warni

[Bug sanitizer/108060] [10/11/12 Regression] UBsan missed an out-of-bound bug at -O0 since r7-1900-g8a1b7b7fd75a3847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108060 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] UBsan

[Bug sanitizer/109107] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBsan since GCC-8 misses an integer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109107 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|UBsan since GCC-8 misses an |[10/11/12/13 Regression]

[Bug sanitizer/109107] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBsan since GCC-8 misses an integer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109107 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/109095] ICE when specializing a template with an auto nontype template template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109095 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532 --- Comment #23 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Kohei Takahashi from comment #21) > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #18) > > (In reply to Barnabás Pőcze from comment #17) > > > The simple test case with std::span still triggers the w

[Bug c/109110] old style function declaration not causing incompatible type on calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109110 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Res

[Bug sanitizer/109107] [10/11/12/13 Regression] UBsan since GCC-8 misses an integer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109107 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- A similar problem: #define INT_MIN (-__INT_MAX__ - 1) int a = INT_MIN; const int b = 676540; int main () { int c = a - 1 + (int) (short) b; return c; } for which I think we need: --- a/gcc/fold-const.

[Bug c++/109122] std::ranges::find segfaults with gcc (trunk but not 12.2) on godbolt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109122 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/109122] std::ranges::find segfaults with gcc (trunk but not 12.2) on godbolt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109122 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Ah, looks like we're trying to print a name of a TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_P, but it doesn't have one; build_ptrmemfunc_type has: 11025 /* Zap out the name so that the back end will give us the debugging 11026

[Bug sanitizer/109134] New: UBSan signed integer overflow check missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109134 Bug ID: 109134 Summary: UBSan signed integer overflow check missing Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sani

[Bug c++/104624] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in standard_conversion, at cp/call.cc:1213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104624 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/104623] [11/12 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.cc:4107

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104623 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-22 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104623] [11/12 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.cc:4107

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104623 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Looks like a missing CPP_PRAGMA_EOL.

[Bug c++/104622] [12 Regression] ICE in compare_ics, at cp/call.cc:11419

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104622 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/104608] [12 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_template_id, at cp/parser.cc:18367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104608 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org P

[Bug c++/104646] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cx_check_missing_mem_inits, at cp/constexpr.cc:845

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-22 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/104646] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cx_check_missing_mem_inits, at cp/constexpr.cc:845

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Somewhat reduced: template struct pair { _T1 first; int second; }; template class __normal_iterator { _Iterator __traits_type; public: constexpr __normal_iterator() {} }; template class allocato

[Bug c++/104647] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_or_insert_ctor_field, at cp/constexpr.cc:3705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104647 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/104647] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_or_insert_ctor_field, at cp/constexpr.cc:3705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104647 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5

[Bug c++/70077] noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79493] Bad diagnostic when referring to inner type that does not exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79493 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104667] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in is_late_template_attribute, at cp/decl2.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-23 CC|

[Bug c++/104667] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in is_late_template_attribute, at cp/decl2.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104668] [12 Regression] ICE in lookup_attribute_spec, at attribs.cc:425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104668 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/104669] [11/12 Regression] ICE in is_function_default_version, at attribs.cc:1219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever co

[Bug c++/104682] New: Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104682 Bug ID: 104682 Summary: Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/104682] Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104682 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/104694] New test case g++.dg/pr104540.C has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104694 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug c++/104682] Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104682 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/98939] [C++23] Implement P1787R6 "Declarations and where to find them"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98939 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Additional comments about this proposal: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578297.html

[Bug c++/104667] [10/11 Regression] ICE in is_late_template_attribute, at cp/decl2.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/104667] [10 Regression] ICE in is_late_template_attribute, at cp/decl2.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/104682] Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104682 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104760] Attribute [[deprecated]] causes diagnostic in never-instantiated template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104760 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org K

[Bug c++/104760] Attribute [[deprecated]] causes diagnostic in never-instantiated template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104760 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- And I think this is the same problem as in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911#c18. Not sure if we want to change anything.

[Bug c++/104752] `Concept auto(x)` should not be a valid function-style cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104752 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-02 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug c++/104618] [12 Regression] trunk 20220221 on x86_64-linux-gnu ICEs building sh.cc for sh4-linux-gnu (in build_call_a, at cp/call.cc:381)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104618 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/104622] [12 Regression] ICE in compare_ics, at cp/call.cc:11419

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104622 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek -

[Bug c++/103871] [11/12 Regression] co_await causes build error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/104765] Expression statement with a return in a lambda-parameter-default causes segfault when called in a different function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104765 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code CC|

[Bug c++/103871] [11/12 Regression] co_await causes build error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104765] Expression statement with a return in a lambda-parameter-default causes segfault when called in a different function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104765 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- The attached patch disables ({}) in lambda param list, which fixes the bug, but also makes things less consistent: void G() { void fn (int i, int = ({ 1; })); // currently OK } void g() { auto a = [](

[Bug c++/104642] Add __builtin_trap() for missing return at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104642 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever co

[Bug c++/102538] [11/12 Regression] Wrong narrowing conversion checking for initializer with union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102538 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104777] gcc crashes while compiling a custom coroutine library sample since r10-5137-g43aae289866f5ea5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104777 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/104788] ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104788 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-04 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104823] [12 Regression] narrowing conversion inside non-dependent decltype operand silently accepted ever since r12-6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104823 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/104823] [12 Regression] narrowing conversion inside non-dependent decltype operand silently accepted ever since r12-6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104823 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/104777] [9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc crashes while compiling a custom coroutine library sample

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104777 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/104777] [9/10/11 Regression] gcc crashes while compiling a custom coroutine library sample

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104777 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc |[9/10/11 Regression] gcc

[Bug c++/104846] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected function_decl, have field_decl in grokmethod, at cp/decl.cc:17999

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104846 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last reco

[Bug c++/104108] [10/11 Regression] [c++17+] template alias inside template with static field of template class rejected since r10-6329-g423284053ec51832

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104108 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression] [c++17+]

[Bug c++/104847] [11/12 Regression] ICE in write_unqualified_name, at cp/mangle.cc:1406

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/104846] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected function_decl, have field_decl in grokmethod, at cp/decl.cc:17999

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104846 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > Confirmed. Started with r10-2475-g777e426772f80c. It would be trivial to > bring back the grokmethod hunk to fix this ICE, but we should be more > helpful and

[Bug c++/104846] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected function_decl, have field_decl in grokmethod, at cp/decl.cc:17999

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104846 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/104846] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected function_decl, have field_decl in grokmethod, at cp/decl.cc:17999

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104846 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104865] Wrong code for conditional expression on VAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104865 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104608] [12 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_template_id, at cp/parser.cc:18367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104608 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/104752] `Concept auto(x)` should not be a valid function-style cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104752 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104284] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '' of kind implicit_conv_expr since r9-6073-ge8b3c1bc3ba22dcf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104284 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org A

[Bug rtl-optimization/104777] [9/10 Regression] gcc crashes while compiling a custom coroutine library sample

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104777 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Summary|[9/10/11 Regre

[Bug c++/90847] misplaced alignment-specifier not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90847 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104008] [11/12 Regression] New g++ folly compile error since r11-7931-ga2531859bf5bf6cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/104008] [11/12 Regression] New g++ folly compile error since r11-7931-ga2531859bf5bf6cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/79318] [DR 1726] conversion member function preceded with & is not marked as error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79318 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/104944] [9/10/11/12 Regression] incorrect alignas(void) accepted (with warning if templated)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/104961] [9/10/11/12 Regression] compilation never (?) finishes at -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104961 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82235] Copy ctor is not found for copying array of an object when it's marked explicit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82235 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|paolo.carlini at

[Bug middle-end/104971] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Optimisation for __builtin_ia32_readeflags corrupts the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104008] [11 Regression] New g++ folly compile error since r11-7931-ga2531859bf5bf6cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] New g++ |[11 Regression] New g++

[Bug c++/104008] [11 Regression] New g++ folly compile error since r11-7931-ga2531859bf5bf6cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #11) > FWIW it seems the new test g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic-alias3.C crashes when using > --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000, similar to PR103769. I cannot repro

[Bug c++/105003] ICE in new test case from r12-7710-gc7a6a32739d62d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105003 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/105003] ICE in new test case from r12-7710-gc7a6a32739d62d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105003 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-21 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/104008] [11 Regression] New g++ folly compile error since r11-7931-ga2531859bf5bf6cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- Ah, need -fchecking=2: $ ./cc1plus -quiet variadic-alias3.C -Iinclude --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000 -fchecking=2 hash table checking failed: equal operator returns true for a pair of values wi

[Bug c/82283] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/84685] Designated initializers warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >