[Bug c++/97947] [11 Regression] ICE in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1145

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97947 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- We crash here 1143 /* Come here only for aggregates: records, arrays, unions, complex numbers 1144 and vectors. */ 1145 gcc_assert (code == ARRAY_TYPE 1146 || VECTOR_TYPE_P (type) 114

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97995] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'typed' structure, have 'deferred_noexcept' in unify, at cp/pt.c:23473 since r7-4383-g51dc660315ef83dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97995 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97962] ICE in build_over_call, at cp/call.c:8976

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97962 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Se

[Bug c++/84655] internal compiler error: unexpected expression 'a' of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84655 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug c++/97966] [10/11 Regression] maybe_instantiate_noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97966 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97966] [10/11 Regression] maybe_instantiate_noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97966 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Reduced (but invalid?): // PR c++/97966 template struct S { __attribute__((used)) S() noexcept(noexcept(this->foo())); void foo(); }; void g () { S<1> s; }

[Bug c++/97993] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19834 since r11-423-gcda6396a1b6e6bba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97993 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/97993] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19834 since r11-423-gcda6396a1b6e6bba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97993 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97187] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97187 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/86769] g++ destroys condition variable in for statement too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97975] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE unexpected expression '(int)A< >::b' of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97975 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug c++/97975] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE unexpected expression '(int)A< >::b' of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97975 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/97947] [11 Regression] ICE in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1145

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97947 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.0|8.5 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek -

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/98101] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:4033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98103] [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-02 Keywords|

[Bug c++/98103] [10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97993] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19834 since r11-423-gcda6396a1b6e6bba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97993 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97187] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97187 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97975] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE unexpected expression '(int)A< >::b' of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97975 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/98126] New: -Wsequence-point is non-linear for certain cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98126 Bug ID: 98126 Summary: -Wsequence-point is non-linear for certain cases Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/98122] [10/11 Regression] Accessing union member through pointer-to-member is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98122 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98122] [10/11 Regression] Accessing union member through pointer-to-member is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98122 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/98126] -Wsequence-point is non-linear for certain cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98126 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/96675] [10 Regression] tautological-compare warning emitted for NTTP bitwise comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96675 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Giorgio Audrito from comment #5) > I add that a very similar problem happens with -Wtype-limits, I found this > minimal example: > > template > struct foo { > bool bar(unsigned y) { >

[Bug c++/98163] ICE symtab_node::verify failed, auto& NTTP specialized with same entity but different type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98163 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/98126] -Wsequence-point is non-linear for certain cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98126 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/98164] [C++20] The type displayed in compiler output cannot be reused as displayed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98164 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/91415] Invalid warning for C++17 sequencing of shift operator E1<

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91415 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Ben Wiederhake from comment #7) > A testcase got added in PR 98043. Yay! > > The testcase contains a `default:` in the switch-case statement. Wasn't it > the case that the bug got triggered by a

[Bug c++/91241] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: symtab_node::verify failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91241 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- Ah, so a C++ front end issue after all. Thanks Martin & Honza.

[Bug c++/97634] [10/11 Regression] ICE 'verify_gimple' failed on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97634 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/98043] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r5-3726-g083e891e69429f93b958f6c18e2d52f515bae572

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org --- Comment #10 f

[Bug c++/98103] [10 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'integer_cst' in cxx_eval_dynamic_cast_fn, at cp/constexpr.c:2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98103 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE tree |[10 Regression] ICE tree

[Bug c++/97517] 'nullptr_type' not supported by simple_type_specifier'nullptr_type' not supported by direct_abstract_declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97517 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/82099] internal compiler error: in type_throw_all_p, at cp/except.c:1186 when using a function pointer for templated predicate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82099 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug c++/68451] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using decltype with friend inside a class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68451 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/68451] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using decltype with friend inside a class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68451 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91506] Incorrectly issued error: parameter may not have variably modified type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91506 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/91506] Incorrectly issued error: parameter may not have variably modified type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91506 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98231] New: [11 Regression] bogus error: no match for ‘operator<<’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98231 Bug ID: 98231 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus error: no match for ‘operator<<’ Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/98231] [11 Regression] bogus error: no match for ‘operator<<’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98231 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/98295] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:4312

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98295] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:4312

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Keywords|

[Bug c++/98296] ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98296 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-15 CC|

[Bug c++/98297] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier, at cp/parser.c:19653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52830] ICE: "canonical types differ for identical types ..." when attempting SFINAE with member type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98333] [10/11 Regression] ICE in check_qualified_type, at tree.c:6593 since r10-1280-g78f7607db4c53f8c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98333 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ta

[Bug c++/97198] __is_constructible(int[], int) should return true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97198 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/97202] [11 Regression] GCC reports an error: expected unqualified-id before ‘short’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97202] GCC reports an error: expected unqualified-id before ‘short’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/97202] GCC reports an error: expected unqualified-id before ‘short’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.0|---

[Bug c++/97198] __is_constructible(int[], int) should return true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97198 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org Stat

[Bug c++/97198] __is_constructible(int[], int) should return true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97198 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Hmm. It should be false for construction from no arguments i.e. > __is_constructible(int[]). > > But thanks to parenthesized aggregate init, you can actually d

[Bug c++/84930] Brace-closed initialization of cstring (i.e."abcdefghi") to coresponding aggregate types fails in certain situation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84930 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/88323] implement C++20 language features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323 Bug 88323 depends on bug 88335, which changed state. Bug 88335 Summary: Implement P1073R3, C++20 immediate functions (consteval). https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/88335] Implement P1073R3, C++20 immediate functions (consteval).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88335 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97220] Overload resolution works wrong when implicit conversion not exists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97220 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97221] Returning an array unexpectedly favors const overload in return value's constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97221 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97230] Invocation of non-static member function on a null instance in core constant expression should not be allowed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97230 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94695] Implement -Wrange-loop-analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94695 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- First part of the warning is now implemented.

[Bug c++/90210] [C++17] CTAD forbidding explicit deduction guide for copy-list-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90210 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89062] class template argument deduction failure with parentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89062 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97230] Invocation of non-static member function on a null instance in core constant expression should not be allowed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97230 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/97014] Class NTTPs not demangled in the compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97014 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/97014] Class NTTPs not demangled in the compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97014 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/97256] auto function return different result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97256 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever con

[Bug c++/97014] Class NTTPs not demangled in the compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97014 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96805] [10/11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in instantiate_template / pop_nested_class()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96805 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||furkanusta17 at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/97293] ICE Segfault in C++20 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97293 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug c++/97285] Interaction between no_unique_address and has_unique_object_representations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97285 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97279] GCC ignores the operation definition of the template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97296] New: g++ accepts-invalid after DR2352 fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97296 Bug ID: 97296 Summary: g++ accepts-invalid after DR2352 fix Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/97296] [10/11 Regression] g++ accepts-invalid after DR2352 fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97296 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/97297] New: typename wrongly required in out-of-class member function definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97297 Bug ID: 97297 Summary: typename wrongly required in out-of-class member function definitions Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/97297] typename wrongly required in out-of-class member function definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97297 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97297] typename wrongly required in out-of-class member function definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97297 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/97297] typename wrongly required in out-of-class member function definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97297 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97279] GCC ignores the operation definition of the template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97279 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-07 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/96299] Defaulted operator <=> implicitly deleted when a member has operator < and operator == and return type is specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96299 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97340] Spurious rejection of member variable template of reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97340 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97328] [10/11 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:3995 since r10-7313-gb599bf9d6d1e180d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97328 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/98366] New: [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 Bug ID: 98366 Summary: [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: mi

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 CC|

[Bug middle-end/98366] [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Seems like since that revision we completely elide the memcmp check.

[Bug c++/93383] ICE on accessing field of a structure which is non-type template parameter, -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbassett271 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/98367] ICE with CTAD non-type template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98367 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/93383] ICE on accessing field of a structure which is non-type template parameter, -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- template struct ctad_t { A a; }; template struct myclass { }; template constexpr auto myobject = ctad_t {Something::value}; template using thing = myclass>;

[Bug c++/97745] [10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:14666

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97745 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98441] [11 Regression] member function pointer incorrectly parsed as having trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98441 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Priority|P3

[Bug c++/98515] [11 Regression] Possible regression causing "is protected within this context" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98515 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90799] noexcept specification dependent on template argument throws internal compiler error when trying to deduce it from a function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98538] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_build_qualified_type_real, at cp/tree.c:1335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98538 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/98538] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_build_qualified_type_real, at cp/tree.c:1335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98538 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Valid test: template using CArray = U[]; template > struct X { };

[Bug c++/90799] noexcept specification dependent on template argument throws internal compiler error when trying to deduce it from a function argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90799 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/93676] [8 Regression] crash in build_value_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93676 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92031] [9 Regression] Incorrect "taking address of r-value" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92031 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >