[Bug c++/97648] Rejects valid direct initialization from prvalue (private destructor)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97648 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97643] Accepts invalid qualification conversion involving array of unknown bound [P0388]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97643 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97645] Rejects valid subscript expression on array of unknown bound in constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97645 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97363] Missing diagnostics when trying to initialize rvalue reference variable with lvalue expression when using decltype(auto) type deduction.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97363 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/78209] Decltype of rvalue reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78209 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/97710] Help with breaking change? cast pointer-to-member address in template parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97710 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97712] Attribute nodiscard in virtual methods is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97712 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last recon

[Bug c++/97712] Attribute nodiscard in virtual methods is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97712 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Looks like we don't track attributes properly for OBJ_TYPE_REFs in maybe_warn_nodiscard.

[Bug c++/81930] [meta-bug] Issues with -Weffc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81930 Bug 81930 depends on bug 25814, which changed state. Bug 25814 Summary: Request for warning for parser ambiguity of function declarations and variable declarations with initializations https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 25814, which changed state. Bug 25814 Summary: Request for warning for parser ambiguity of function declarations and variable declarations with initializations https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814

[Bug c++/25814] Request for warning for parser ambiguity of function declarations and variable declarations with initializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97675] GCC does not allow turning off the warning for exceptions being caught by an earlier handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97675 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78209] Decltype of rvalue reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78209 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug c++/54366] [meta-bug] decltype issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54366 Bug 54366 depends on bug 78209, which changed state. Bug 78209 Summary: Decltype of rvalue reference https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78209 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/64892] [C++14] generic lambdas, decltype(auto), and rvalue references, oh my!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64892 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/54366] [meta-bug] decltype issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54366 Bug 54366 depends on bug 64892, which changed state. Bug 64892 Summary: [C++14] generic lambdas, decltype(auto), and rvalue references, oh my! https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64892 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c++/81660] Add -Wexceptions warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81660 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Yup, that was only an option for the existing warning. We should extend the warning to detect the case above too.

[Bug c++/81660] Add -Wexceptions warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81660 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Candidate patch: --- a/gcc/cp/except.c +++ b/gcc/cp/except.c @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ static tree do_allocate_exception (tree); static tree wrap_cleanups_r (tree *, int *, void *); static int complete_ptr_ref_or_

[Bug c++/81660] Add -Wexceptions warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81660 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/97518] Improving static_assert diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97518 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/81660] Add -Wexceptions warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81660 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97752] incorrect address to inherited object in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97752 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97762] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in warn_about_ambiguous_parse)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97762 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/97762] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in warn_about_ambiguous_parse)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97762 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #3 from Ma

[Bug c++/97762] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in warn_about_ambiguous_parse)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97762 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94404] [meta-bug] C++ core issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404 Bug 94404 depends on bug 97453, which changed state. Bug 97453 Summary: Implement CWG issue 2303 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97453 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/97453] Implement CWG issue 2303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97453 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/97785] const_cast shows diagnostic about Y*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97785 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/97518] Improving static_assert diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97518 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Would it be possible to provide a preprocessed source file?

[Bug c++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Reduced. Nothing MSP430-specific here. template struct A; struct B { typedef A type; }; template struct A { static const T max = 1 ? 1 << (T) -1 : 0; }; template const T A::max; class F {}; template v

[Bug c++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target|msp430-elf | --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/96121] Uninitialized variable copying in member initialized list not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96121 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug c++/97846] No diagnostic for use of identifier label in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97846 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-17 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/97874] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have template_type_parm in lookup_using_decl, at cp/name-lookup.c:4652

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever con

[Bug c++/97874] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have template_type_parm in lookup_using_decl, at cp/name-lookup.c:4652

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/97871] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_declaration, at cp/parser.c:13539

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97871 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97839] Template lambda incorrectly requiring the optional lambda-declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97839 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/97839] Template lambda incorrectly requiring the optional lambda-declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97839 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/97877] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_genericize_r, at cp/cp-gimplify.c:968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/97877] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_genericize_r, at cp/cp-gimplify.c:968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- We ICE because stmt's DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC is null: 965 /* Map block scope extern declarations to visible declarations with the 966 same name and type in outer scopes if any. */ 967 if (VAR_OR_FUN

[Bug c++/97878] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97881] [11 Regression] ICE in warn_about_ambiguous_parse, at cp/parser.c:20800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97881 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug c++/70489] ICE in cxx_eval_increment_expression initializing a VLA in a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70489 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/16994] [meta-bug] VLA and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994 Bug 16994 depends on bug 70489, which changed state. Bug 70489 Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_increment_expression initializing a VLA in a constexpr function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70489 What|Removed

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 70489, which changed state. Bug 70489 Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_increment_expression initializing a VLA in a constexpr function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70489 What|Removed

[Bug c++/97749] ICE: Segmentation Fault on C++20 NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97749 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Se

[Bug c++/97878] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/97837] ICE on requires with *this in destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97837 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/97801] overload resolution ambiguity isn't detected when rvalue ref qualifier is involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97801 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97751] C++20 NTTP: class template argument deduction failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97751 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug c++/93083] copy deduction rejected when doing CTAD for NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janpmoeller at gmx dot de --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/93083] copy deduction rejected when doing CTAD for NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Short test from Bug 97751: template struct use_as_nttp {}; template struct has_nttp {}; template using has_nttp_2 = has_nttp;

[Bug c++/97895] [11 Regression] ICE in do_auto_deduction, at cp/pt.c:29255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97895 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last recon

[Bug c++/97523] [11 Regression] bogus "would use explicit constructor" error for new[]()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97523 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Better test: // PR c++/97523 // { dg-do compile } struct T { explicit T(); T(int); }; void fn (int n) { new T[1](); new T[2](); new T[3](); new T[n](); #if __cpp_aggregate_paren_init new T[](

[Bug c++/97899] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in split_nonconstant_init_1, at cp/typeck2.c:626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97899 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-19 Keywords|

[Bug c++/97899] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in split_nonconstant_init_1, at cp/typeck2.c:626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97899 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r11-4959.

[Bug c++/97899] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in split_nonconstant_init_1, at cp/typeck2.c:626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97899 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Reduced: // PR c++/97899 template T fn(T a) { return a; } template struct C { void bar() { int d = 42; const int i = int{fn(d)}; } };

[Bug c++/89197] Templated Functions const auto assignment causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89197 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/89197] Templated Functions const auto assignment causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89197 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/89197] Templated Functions const auto assignment causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89197 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/97899] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in split_nonconstant_init_1, at cp/typeck2.c:626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97899 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Reduced even more: // PR c++/97899 template int fn() { return 1; } template void bar() { const int i = int{fn()}; }

[Bug c++/97900] g++ crashes when instantiating a templated function with a template-type vector parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97900 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Confirmed. Started with r266055.

[Bug c++/97900] [9/10/11 Regression] g++ crashes when instantiating a templated function with a template-type vector parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97900 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/97900] [9/10/11 Regression] g++ crashes when instantiating a templated function with a template-type vector parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97900 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97905] [11 Regression] ice in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.c:2754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97905 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97704] [11 Regression][concepts] Not working with explicit types in function signatures?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97704 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97704] [11 Regression][concepts] Not working with explicit types in function signatures?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97704 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/97296] [10/11 Regression] g++ accepts-invalid after DR2352 fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97296 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97883] [C++20] Segmentation fault on template with braced initializer list A<{}>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97883 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug c++/97895] [11 Regression] ICE in do_auto_deduction, at cp/pt.c:29255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97895 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/97914] -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks not working properly with constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97914 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97913] -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks not working properly with constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97913 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- *** Bug 97914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/97913] -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks not working properly with constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97913 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97908] Should _ZTI and _ZTS symbols be marked GNU_UNIQUE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97908 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97852] Parameter pack not found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97852 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97820] VLAs in function declarations fail to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97820 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-19 CC|

[Bug c++/97819] Pack expansion in member initializer lists nested with their parameter list got rejected.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97819 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97772] Wording of GCC's error message when calling lvalue-ref qualified member function on temporary object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97772 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last recon

[Bug c++/97745] [10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:14666

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97745 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/97700] Bogus error when a class containing a function pointer is used as a non-type template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97700 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-19 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/97895] [11 Regression] ICE in do_auto_deduction, at cp/pt.c:29255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97895 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97523] [11 Regression] bogus "would use explicit constructor" error for new[]()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97523 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/78928] void(*); accepted in block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78928 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug c++/97601] ICE when using type determined by std::tuple_element_t<...>, on tuple generated from type id stored in std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97601 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/85016] internal compiler error: side-effects element in no-side-effects CONSTRUCTOR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85016 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug c++/97918] ICE near htab_hash_string when LTO, -O & -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Se

[Bug c++/97427] constexpr destructor for const object incorrectly rejected as modifying const object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97427 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed on trunk. I plan to backport to 10.

[Bug c++/97839] Template lambda incorrectly requiring the optional lambda-declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97839 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97881] [11 Regression] ICE in warn_about_ambiguous_parse, at cp/parser.c:20800

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97881 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97846] No diagnostic for use of identifier label in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97846 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 94695, which changed state. Bug 94695 Summary: Implement -Wrange-loop-analysis https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94695 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/94695] Implement -Wrange-loop-analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94695 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97934] Adding an operator== breaks implicit operator== generation from defaulted <=>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97934 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97938] g++ crash when inferring type of auto parameter pack in lambda capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97938] 9/10/11 Regression] g++ crash when inferring type of auto parameter pack in lambda capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|g++ crash when inferring|9/10/11 Regression] g++

[Bug c++/97947] [11 Regression] ICE in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1145

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97947 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-23 Status|UNCONFIRME

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >