https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
There was en error + ICE, but since r11-5752 we only have the ICE.
Looks like the ICE started with r277865.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99833
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-30
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99427, which changed state.
Bug 99427 Summary: [modules] in system headers: non-constant condition for
static assertion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99427
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99427
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99833
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|-std=c++20 |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99833
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced:
namespace std {
template struct integral_constant {
static constexpr int value = __v;
};
template struct tuple_size;
template struct tuple_element;
template
using __tuple_element_t = typename
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
The problem is that post-r277865 in defaulted_late_check we call
synthesize_method here:
if (kind == sfk_comparison)
{
/* If the function was declared constexpr, check that the definition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99223
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99241
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 99223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99223, which changed state.
Bug 99223 Summary: [modules] stdl header-unit ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99223
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99284
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99284, which changed state.
Bug 99284 Summary: [modules] ICE in key_mergeable, at cp/module.cc:10441
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99284
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99844
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-31
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99844
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99850
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99850
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99855
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99869
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99869
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #2 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99874
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE: in |[10 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99897
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
template struct A {};
template struct S { void foo(S<+a>); };
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99904
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96873
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Yeah, hopefully for both.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52202
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52202
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99844
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
We also ICE on
template
struct S {
void fn() noexcept(B);
};
void fn ()
{
S s;
s.fn();
}
so this needs to be fixed more generally than just in explicit().
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
A test that should be accepted:
// PR c++/99806
struct S {
template
void f(T) noexcept(B);
static constexpr bool B = true;
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99968
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[11 Regression] IC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99968
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99844
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Another related test that we should probably accept:
// PR c++/99806
struct S {
void f(auto, auto, int = 3);
};
void
g ()
{
S s;
s.f(1, 2);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99980
Bug ID: 99980
Summary: Delayed parsing of noexcept doesn't work in member
function template
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99980
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Since Comment 3 isn't a regression, I've opened bug 99980.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99964
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE: in |[10 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99983
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97995
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13
Bug ID: 13
Summary: internal compiler error: in merge_exception_specifiers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Without the directive:
q.C:6:22: error: declaration of ‘S::S() noexcept (T::value)’ has a different
exception specifier
6 | template S::S() noexcept(T::value) {}
| ^~~~
q.C:4:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99983
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r160297 or r160298 I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
The problem is that, when we're in a system header,
check_redeclaration_exception_specification doesn't emit an error:
1242 if (DECL_IN_SYSTEM_HEADER (old_decl))
1243 complained = pedwarn (n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-09
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98333
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97966
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98947
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99374
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99120
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99176
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99331
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91416
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99806
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98899
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97973
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98800
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100019
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100023
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97966
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
Argh! Sorry about that, will fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100037
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100037
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
(Not a regression AFAICT.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97966
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100039
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-12
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100065
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100074
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100084
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99803
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100109
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100109
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r251433.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100122
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97536
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 97536, which changed state.
Bug 97536 Summary: [concepts] parser segfault for concept defined in function
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97536
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96380
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100161
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96379
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96380
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 96379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100164
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100172
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96380
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89605
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91241
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xavier at cremaschi dot fr
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100198
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-22
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100055
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100055
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|ICE on inva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100210
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100210
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100161
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression]
|I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241
Bug ID: 100241
Summary: internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at
lra-constraints.c:4133
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #1 from Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
This is on aarch64:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/11/lto-wrapper
Target: aarch64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --enable-bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Now reproduced with a single file. Reducing that...
101 - 200 of 2992 matches
Mail list logo