[Bug other/12081] Gcc can't be compiled with -mregparm=3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081 --- Comment #30 from Michael Meissner --- On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:22:32PM +, olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12081 > > --- Comment #29 from Oleg Endo --- > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from com

[Bug rtl-optimization/50101] GCC 4.5 and 4.6 generate suboptimal code on ppc for countdown loops when the CTR register cannot be used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50101 --- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner 2011-08-19 14:05:51 UTC --- On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:58:28AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Did you try pessimizing the non-ctr reg alternatives (and the memory > alternative even more)? Like ad

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner --- On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:03:50AM +, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 > > --- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany --- > Is this fixed by http://gcc.gn

[Bug target/57386] ICE: hash-long-double-tr1-aux.cc:54:7: error: unrecognizable insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386 --- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner --- On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 04:37:20PM +, dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386 > > --- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn --- > Mike, can you apply the patch to th

[Bug target/57386] ICE: hash-long-double-tr1-aux.cc:54:7: error: unrecognizable insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386 --- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner --- On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 08:11:23AM +, stigge at antcom dot de wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386 > > --- Comment #10 from Roland Stigge --- > Please apply this patch only to 4

[Bug target/57386] ICE: hash-long-double-tr1-aux.cc:54:7: error: unrecognizable insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386 --- Comment #12 from Michael Meissner --- On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:22:13AM +, meissner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386 > > --- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner --- > On

[Bug target/57386] ICE: hash-long-double-tr1-aux.cc:54:7: error: unrecognizable insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386 --- Comment #13 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 31429 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31429&action=edit pr57386.patch01-gcc49

[Bug target/51390] Builtin changes on November 29th, broke recip-5.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51390 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner 2011-12-06 18:21:48 UTC --- On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 03:52:47PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51390 > > Dominique d'Humieres changed: > >Wh

[Bug testsuite/41701] scan-assembler-not has false positives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner 2011-12-08 19:34:47 UTC --- On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:20:50PM +, gseanmcg at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701 > > --- Comment #4 from Sean McGovern 2011-12-08 >

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:13:11PM +, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 > > --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- > Where do you get TImode wi

[Bug target/83969] [8 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2997 (error: could not split insn) for powerpc targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:13:11PM +, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969 > > --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- > Where do you get TImode wi

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:35:35PM +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 > > --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> --- >

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #12 from Michael Meissner --- On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:57:05PM +, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 > > Bill Schmidt changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #31 from Michael Meissner --- On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 02:32:13AM +, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 > > --- Comment #30 from Bernd Schmidt --- > Something like this maybe? I

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #32 from Michael Meissner --- On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 05:53:35PM +, meissner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 > > --- Comment #31 from Michael Meissner --- > On

[Bug target/80210] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 on ppc64 for with __builtin_pow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:26:57PM +, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210 > > --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- > So it seems rs6000_pragma_targ

[Bug target/79158] gcc.target/powerpc/pr70669.c fails on powerpc BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79158 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 09:17:26PM +, pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Mike, Does this reasoning sound correct to you? If so I'll submit a patch. That looks fine. Thanks.

[Bug target/79354] [7 Regression] -mcpu=power8 -O2 generates power9 instruction on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner --- On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 01:41:44AM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79354 > > --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Created attachment 40661 > -->

[Bug target/79752] incorrect code generation for __divkf3 with -O2 -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79752 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:13:42PM +, acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79752 > > --- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Meissner spotted

[Bug target/79905] ICE in canonical types differ for identical types __vector(4) int and V4i {aka __vector(4) int}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79905 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner --- On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:10:19PM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79905 Generally, the "vector" keyword is a conditional macro that looks at the ne

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 --- Comment #19 from Michael Meissner --- On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:00:37PM +, brenohl at br dot ibm.com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 > > --- Comment #16 from Breno Leitao --- > If it helps, the problem is re

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:14:38PM +, kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 > > kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/80108] ICE in aggregate_value_p at function.c:2028

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 --- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner --- On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:35:20PM +, kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80108 > > --- Comment #9 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- > I've got a patch no

[Bug rtl-optimization/60763] [4.9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn starting with rev 208984

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 --- Comment #14 from Michael Meissner --- On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:21:13PM +, dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763 > > --- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn --- > Gentlemen, I really do not unders

[Bug target/65614] [5 Regression] PowerPC VSX systems should use XSCPSGNDP to copy scalar fp data to/from Altivec registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 07:19:24PM +, dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614 > > --- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn --- > Comment on attachment 35227 > -

[Bug target/48262] [4.7 Regression] Subversion id 171341 breaks various vectorization files on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262 --- Comment #17 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-31 18:43:44 UTC --- On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:43:05PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262 > > --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres > 20