https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92558
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92558
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Will look.
Thanks, there's a code snippet which is different before and after the
revision. Hopefully, it can be used for a reproducer creation:
$ cat set.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92529
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Nov 18 11:51:05 2019
New Revision: 278395
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278395&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Verify NOP_EXPR LHS type in IPA ICF.
2019-11-18 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92529
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92518
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92529
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92525
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Nov 18 13:04:57 2019
New Revision: 278405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278405&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Unset m_checker in sem_function::init.
2019-11-18 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #12)
> > It still fails for me with the current trunk:
> >
> > $ ../configure --prefix=/tmp/gcc/ --disable-multilib --without-isl
> > --disable-libsanitizer --with-build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92540
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I've reduced the test-case which started to fail with the commit:
$ cat riscv.cc
enum machine_mode {};
enum rtx_code { SUBREG, PLUS };
bool fn1(int);
int fn2(machine_mode);
struct A {
int offset;
};
machine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92525
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #14)
> > Did you use bootstrap-lto-lean (and not bootstrap-lto)?
>
> OK, I finally managed to reproduce and debug this.
> It is triggered by fact that bootstrap-lean is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92540
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 92540, which changed state.
Bug 92540 Summary: [10 regression] r278218 breaks bootstrap on riscv64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92540
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92540
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 19 07:22:21 2019
New Revision: 278429
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278429&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Initialize a variable due to -Wmaybe-uninitialized.
2019-11-19 Martin Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92508
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
> We may do something like that, but testsuite requires dejagnu that is
> not normally necessary for bootstrapping.
I see.
> It would also let us to train
> -O0 compilation that is quite important for perof
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Richi, I noticed the following graph:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91165
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
My reduced test-case is probably very similar:
template constexpr _Tp forward(_Tp p1) { return p1; }
template struct A {
_T1 first;
_T2 second;
constexpr A(_T1 p1, _T2 p2) : first(p1), second(p2) {}
}
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the following ICE in openssl package:
$ gcc fips_rsagtest.o libssl.a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92588
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92588
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #1)
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > I noticed that the speed drop back on the trunk happened since r278281.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Starting with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92595
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92365
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Just for the record, I see the failure in spatialindex package.
-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92596
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47308
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92599
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Happens for the following test-case:
$ cat verify.ii
typedef int size_t;
template struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92609
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
,
||needs-reduction
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2019-11-21
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92610
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Following ICEs:
$ cat ice.cpp
-gnu
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Summary|ICE: lto1: internal |ICE: symtab_node::verify
|compiler error: |failed, building
|symtab_node::verify failed, |523.xalancbmk_r with
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 26163
Target Milestone: ---
Since defaulting to -fno-common, one can't build the benchmark due to:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92612
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 92612, which changed state.
Bug 92612 Summary: [10 Regression] Linker error in 525.x264_r after r278509
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92612
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92612
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ian at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see following bootstrap error:
[29747s] libtool: link:
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-10.0.0+r278519/obj-x86_64-suse-linux/./gcc
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see following ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90576
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
@Maxim: Can you please retest it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92653
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the following ICE
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 92584 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92584
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2019-11-25
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, apparently it's an invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92654
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to fiesh from comment #2)
> It's been made invalid by creduce, but the original code was valid.
>
> If necessary, we can try to produce valid code that leads to the same issue.
> But I'd only do so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92653
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Nov 25 13:57:00 2019
New Revision: 278686
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278686&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Comment too strict checking assert.
2019-11-25 Martin Liska
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88617
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Daniel Santos from comment #3)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > @Daniel: Can you please take a look?
>
> My apologies for missing this one! I'll take a look.
@Daniel: Any update
||2019-11-26
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> I think I remember seeing Martin Liska send
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92669
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone
-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92674
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92676
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47363
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47363&action=edit
1.ii
: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92676
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47364
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47364&action=edit
2.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92676
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: alejandro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Starting from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92677
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92677
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91576
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47374
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47374&action=edit
Another test-case
I see very similar error since the problematic revision:
$ g++ -O3 -fPIC file*.ii -flto
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91576
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the following ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92691
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92691
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Started with r274933.
Yep, it's already mentioned in the PR title :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46558
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88702
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92005
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14799
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92476
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
And I have one more test-case reduced from rubygem-passenger:
$ cat kit.ii
namespace Passenger {
namespace Json {
class Value;
}
namespace ConfigKit {
class Translator;
}
namespace LoggingKit {
void initializ
at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92599
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92372
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
@Honza?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92190
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
@Uros: Any update about this? Do you know about somebody who can help us with
an answer to your question?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91916
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
@Iain: ping^2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92600
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92599
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|NE
gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92190
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||10walls at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91273
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
--- Comment #30 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 91273 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92715
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92715
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47391
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47391&action=edit
Reduced test-case
Fails with:
$ gfortran -O3 -march=znver2 mdbx.f90
mdbx.f90:9:16:
9 | PARAMETER NM=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92609
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Nov 28 20:56:23 2019
New Revision: 278819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Properly use TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT in warn_types_mismatch.
2019-11-28 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46558
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Nov 28 20:56:51 2019
New Revision: 278820
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278820&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Translate header for -fdbg-cnt-list.
2019-11-28 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92609
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46558
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 46558, which changed state.
Bug 46558 Summary: dbgcnt.c messages not marked for translation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46558
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92715
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
||2019-11-29
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92654
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #8 from Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91574
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Nov 29 09:03:25 2019
New Revision: 278829
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278829&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Check for TYPE_NAME in type_with_linkage_p.
2019-11-29 Martin Liska
1501 - 1600 of 11718 matches
Mail list logo
