https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96150
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96291
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96245
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
|1
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96035
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE: in |[10/11 Regression] ICE
|ASSIGNED
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |crazylht at gmail dot
com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96261
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(with -std=c++14).
|1
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r5-5019
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96206
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
||2020-07-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed on ppc64le machine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I'm gonna bisect that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96285
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Hey Göran.
I like both your suggestions for the documentation update. Can you please send
a patch to the gcc-patches mailing list?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
@Martin: Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r11-1715-g346bce6fe0cf1ed5f6a7ad732d2361d77b203c87.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Summary for node e/3:
Returns value
Descriptor for parameter 0:
(locally) unused
param_size_limit: 16, size_reached: 8, by_ref
* Access to unit offset: 0, unit size: 8, type: long int, alias_pt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96235
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96304
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96304
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at
-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #223 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #222)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #221)
> > For the chromium with GCC 10, inliner starts after ~5 minutes, so it's very
> > likely inliner that takes so lo
|with variable size struct |struct and openmp
|and openmp |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96317
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
p/parser.c:769 since
||r11-891-g1dc83b460653c29f
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96318
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2020-07-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, but it seems the code is rejected with clang:
pr96311.c:6:10: error: variable 'used'
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-27
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, ICEs for all revisions I have (4.8.0) with -std=c++14.
at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Working on that.
|1
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-27
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Hello.
Are the 2 back-traces from different threads?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96349
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94307
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96092
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Apparently we've got a patch in queue that does something similar:
>
> +fprofile-prefix-path=
> +Common·Joined·RejectNegative·Var(profile_prefix_path)
> +remove·p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.1
Summary|[11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96353
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92396
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 48943
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48943&action=edit
Time trace prototype
So I've just created a prototype patch, but I don't see it much useful:
https://gist.github
at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Great, I was able to reproduce that. Working on that..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92396
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
|
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
#include
template
class Pen : std::array {
typedef std::array arr;
public:
// Removing either "constexpr" or ": arr()" from the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96206
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Just for the record, it started with .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95679
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96075
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Likely started with r8-568-gf9f69dd651b2f103.
after:
.L7:
movapd y+8176(%rax), %xmm0
movq%rax, %rdx
subq$16, %rax
negq%rdx
cmpq$-8192, %rax
u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96370
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96370
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
@Martin: Any progress on this bug?
||2020-07-30
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r11-2064
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=96379
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r11-2064-g4fd124a23664c712.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96380
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
|1
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, one can see it in
|1
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with r8-3365
||2020-07-30
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Bisecting that..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96388
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96388
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > Started with r9-2469-gc6067437d314f803.
>
> Hmm, it probably makes a latent scheduler issue appear. Guess for bet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95435
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96388
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 48962
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48962&action=edit
Partially reduced test-case
The reduction is quite stuck at this point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96391
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
All right, so please provide pre-processed source file (-E option). I can then
try to reproduce it..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-31
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
I reproduced that locally..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96398
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96388
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: aarch64-linux-gnu
The following is miscompiled:
$ cat x.c
#include
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
> Thanks, can you share the hardware you ran it on? Depending on whether LSE
> is present different code paths are taken at runtime...
Well, I tested that on an experime
|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-10
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96481
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
||2020-08-10
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you for the notes, fixed.
|1
Summary|[10/11] internal compiler |ICE in default_conversion
|error: in |
|default_conversion |
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status
] internal compiler |ICE in
|error: Segmentation fault |get_atomic_generic_size
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96512
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
|--- |INVALID
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Let's close it as invalid then.
||2020-08-10
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Let me take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96454
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96534
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-10
Ever confirmed|0
|NEW
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-10
Summary|Wrong evaluation of a |[10/11 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96541
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96540
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 96541 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96454
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96466
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Started with my r11-1445-g502d63b6d6141597.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96453
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Started with my r11-1445-g502d63b6d6141597.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96453
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96466
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: s390x-linux-gnu
For the following test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Using the current master, -fdbg-cnt=ipa_cp_bits:10461 is first bad debug
counter value where (for
./src/gallium/targets/dri/libgallium_dri.so.wpa.076i.cp):
diff -u /tmp/good.txt /tmp/bad.txt
--- /tmp/good.txt
1001 - 1100 of 11718 matches
Mail list logo
