https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65143
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65423
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65433
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65071
--- Comment #3 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
For the record: a patch for this PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01067.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65507
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65513
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65503
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65154
--- Comment #5 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
I have posted a patch for this bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg00026.html
But it reveals some latent bug (PR65503). In the following case (after applying
the patch):
struct ss {
ss()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
--- Comment #5 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
Or even simpler:
#!/bin/bash
mkdir -p ./src
mkdir -p ./build/src/preproc.h.gch
touch ./src/preproc.h
cat << EOF >./src/include.h
#include "src/preproc.h"
/* line 1 */
/* line 2 */
EOF
cat << EOF >./src/
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: maltsevm at gmail dot com
Running gengtype with the following parameters (from GCC build directory):
$ ./gcc/gengtype -r ./gcc/gtype.state -d
Triggers assertion failure:
typedefs:
pair: name = vec
Type at 0x1e59200:
kind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65800
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
Created attachment 35350
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35350&action=edit
Fix
Just in case, I also regtested it.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: maltsevm at gmail dot com
Consider the following code:
$ cat test.cc
template
struct duration
{
constexpr duration() : r(0) {}
template
constexpr duration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65882
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65919
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66001
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
--- Comment #29 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
Results for attached testcase:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5820K CPU @ 3.30GHz (Haswell)
g++ -O3 -march=native -mtune=native
1 iterations
Clang 3.7
Total absolute time for int32_t for loop unrolling: 0.99 s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65966
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48956
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
-doxyge
n/a00971_source.html
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: web
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: maltsevm at gmail dot com
See the attached URL. The indentation is broken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64524
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64481
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64370
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64677
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64619
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64639
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64677
--- Comment #10 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
> 1. Why does the answer change based on the -std?
I could reproduce the same result on GCC 4.8.2. I suppose that the most
significant difference is that C++11 supports constexpr (and std::complex has
cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64704
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64704
--- Comment #9 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
>what can i do to make the ptr aligned by 16-byte.
Well, you may skip first few bytes (of course not just discard them, but
process one-by-one).
Fortunately, you don't need to do it manually, it can be don
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64743
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64953
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: maltsevm at gmail dot com
The following (presumably valid) code causes segfault on trunk r220715 and
4.9.2:
$ cat ./ice_sizeof.cc
template
struct array
{
int data[N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65071
--- Comment #1 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
A few more comments. I wrote that GCC 5.0 segfaults. That's actually not true,
I could not reproduce segfault on checked builds (only release version of
4.9.2), but never the less it's still ICE.
So, here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65154
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65201
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65274
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65289
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
40 matches
Mail list logo
