[Bug tree-optimization/28940] New: Overzealous CSE with static array access

2006-09-02 Thread lmakhlis at bmc dot com
lous CSE with static array access Product: gcc Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lmakhlis at bmc dot c

[Bug target/22083] New: TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

2005-06-15 Thread lmakhlis at bmc dot com
fined on AIX 5.1 Product: gcc Version: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lmakhlis at bmc dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

2005-06-17 Thread lmakhlis at bmc dot com
--- Additional Comments From lmakhlis at bmc dot com 2005-06-17 19:01 --- It might be an issue with the patch level of libm -- I was testing on 5.1 ML04, which was released in 2002 -- but I've found another machine at ML05 (released in Oct 2003), and it still doesn't have

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

2005-06-17 Thread lmakhlis at bmc dot com
--- Additional Comments From lmakhlis at bmc dot com 2005-06-17 19:32 --- Andrew: I am trying to run older (5.1) programs on a newer (5.2) system, not vice versa -- why would that require forward (rather than backward) compatibility? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id