https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106238
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12 regression] Inline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106119
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] Bogus |[12 Regression] Bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114334
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114303
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114269
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113727
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113396
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113359
--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Go right ahead. I'm mostly trying to get things in the right broad buckets.
So if you've got additional information, please add it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112710
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112703
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180
Bug 89180 depends on bug 56457, which changed state.
Bug 56457 Summary: Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused
variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756
Bug 44756 depends on bug 56457, which changed state.
Bug 56457 Summary: Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused
variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113390
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Made it a P1 simply because it was likely not RISC-V specific ICE. I don't
think we're at a point where it makes sense for RISC-V to be a primary
platform, though hopefully that'll change in the relatively
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114414
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114412
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114411
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114408
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114426
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112697
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 112697, which changed state.
Bug 112697 Summary: [14 Regression] 30-40% exec time regression of 433.milc on
zen2 since r14-4972-g8aa47713701b1f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112697
What|Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114377
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114374
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111655
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111305
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111231
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110987
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110842
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110401
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110285
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110273
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109990
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113357
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108708
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 108278, which changed state.
Bug 108278 Summary: [13/14 Regression] runtime error with -O1 -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108278
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108278
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107058
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106955
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105760
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105275
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104995
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104088
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102264
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101463
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95185
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114510
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114522
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114515
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114513
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114509
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114501
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114415
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114393
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114515
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Thanks for that info Edwin -- my tester flagged them too and mentally I'd
figured it was most likely the combiner change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110748
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77576
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82666
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111467
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111670
Bug ID: 111670
Summary: H8/300 SX uses incorrect code sequences
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111670
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64215
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106271
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109414
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111384
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-07
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111664
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93062
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116136
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116104
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Damn. My bad. I didn't even look around for other instances and there's
several.
So I installed my dummy assembler & linker that always return success and ran
the gcc testsuite after fixing the rest to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116058
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I've done light testing. Essentially it gets us past the ICE. I'm still
seeing a comparison failure, but that will be a distinct BZ once I get get my
brain around what's going wrong.
So ideally Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116136
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116104
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116179
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116185
Bug ID: 116185
Summary: [15 Regression] Comparison failure on sh4 due to debug
symbols
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116199
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Even if we're going to drop m68k due to lack of LRA support, if ext-dce is
doing something wrong, it's still worth debugging & fixing as it likely affects
other ports. And note this is the second issue bis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116199
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116199
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Definitely a latent bug in reload. Looks like it's been around since the
conversion to SUBREG_BYTE back in 2001! We're blindly using
subreg_regno_offset on a case that can't be simplified. We should be c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116199
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115912
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 115912 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115912
--- Comment #22 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'm going to need Stephan to do a bit of debugging on that s390x failure.
ext-dce isn't doing anything with that test on s390.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116242
Bug ID: 116242
Summary: [meta-bug] Tracker for zvl issues in RISC-V
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116240
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116244
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112358
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It could well be the case that the threader could transform this code to
eliminate the unexecutable path, but that it wasn't deemed profitable, thus
leaving a path in the IL that will never occur at runtime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116240
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116283
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-08
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116283
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Code is a bit nonsensical in that it masks a shift by a crazy value (3629), but
the underlying bug is real. Ultimately we're going to rely on the fact that
hardware truncates the count (mask with 0x3f) and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116244
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116283
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116282
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116282
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I haven't fully debugged, but I strongly suspect this is a case where matching
is inconsistent before/after LRA due to the paths through the constant
synthesis code which check if we can create new pseudos.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116244
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Adjusting subreg_regno isn't going to work. reload depends on it producing
"bogus" results to then trigger reloading inner parts of the subreg
expressions. Adjusting alter_reg might be an option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116236
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
If you have a case where a pseudo register is normally valid, but a MEM would
not be valid. Then you reject that case when strict is on and the pseudo did
not get a hard register.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116236
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
In general I would think rejecting is right way to go under the general
guidance of making the predicates and such match what the underlying hardware
can actually do. So for example, if we we have (mem (r
501 - 600 of 1404 matches
Mail list logo