https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94518
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94518
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94530
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93053
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94591
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93871
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94694
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95128
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95129
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95341
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95341
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Interestingly, -msve-vector-bits gives good codegen for 128, 256, 512 but bad
for 1024, 2048 and VLA code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95399
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95399
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95471
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95899
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96196
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96305
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The reduced testcase:
typedef int a;
int d;
void e(char f, char *g, char *h, char *l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96357
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.1, 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks, can you share the hardware you ran it on? Depending on whether LSE is
present different code paths are taken at runtime...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks, that's a CPU without the LSE instructions so it should be using the
load-exclusive-store-exclusive loop fallback
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 48985 [details]
> gcc11-pr96402.patch
>
> So, something like this then? Then the SIZE 16 compare and swap matches
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64*-*-*
The following (reduced) testcase ICEs on aarch64 with
-O2 -w -march=armv8.2-a+sve2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96483
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Known to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96796
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.1, 11.0, 8.4.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96796
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64*-*-*
The following SVE intrinsics code ICEs with -O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve
#include
void b (void);
void
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96915
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.1
--- Comment #1 from
: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64*-*-*
The reduced testcase:
float a;
int
b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96974
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.1, 11.0
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96357
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92388
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
-fpatchable-function-entry seems to interact badly with
-mbranch-protection=standard (used to insert BTI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93184
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93184
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Wojciech Migda from comment #2)
> Should there be at least a warning in case when the shift amount is a
> compile-time known constant?
In an ideal world yes. Howevever, mos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92424
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92692
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It will need a target with LSE atomics. -march=armv8.1-a or equivalent. Or add
+lse to an -march or -mcpu line.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92692
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #11)
> It will need a target with LSE atomics. -march=armv8.1-a or equivalent. Or
> add +lse to an -march or -mcpu line.
Wait, no sorry, this should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93341
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The assert triggering is:
enum rtx_code inv_cond_code
= reversed_comparison_code (cond, insn);
/* We should be able to reverse all conditions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
Bug #: 56321
Summary: ICE:segfault in midend for -funsafe-math-optimizations
-O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56321
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-15 11:08:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 29463
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29463
Slightly modified testcase
This testcase is similar, but gives the error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56662
Bug #: 56662
Summary: ICE in gcc.dg/vect/vect-outer-5.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56720
Bug #: 56720
Summary: ICE when expanding vcond with floating point unordered
comparisons
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56720
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-25 12:23:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 29721
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29721
Patch to fix ICE on trunk
Patch fixing bug on trunk.
Will test to ensure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56738
Bug #: 56738
Summary: ICE in c-c++-common/torture/vshuf-v4di.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56738
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56738
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-26 12:07:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I see a similar error on powerpc-*-* (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-03/msg02572.html ) for
> c-c++-commo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56729
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-02 09:43:57 UTC ---
Similar problem on aarch64-none-elf. The testcase produces this ICE with
aarch64-none-elf-gcc ice.c -S
ice.c:28:1: internal compiler error: in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-none-eabi, |arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-03 16:42:18 UTC ---
r197425 for arm
2013-04-03 Kyrylo Tkachov
PR target/56809
* config/arm/arm.c (is_jump_table): Use next_active_insn instead of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56720
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56916
Bug #: 56916
Summary: ICE when building libgfortran for arm-none-eabi
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56916
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56916
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11 11:34:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 29856
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29856
Reduced testcase
ICEs with:
-std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmiss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56921
--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-15 15:26:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Created attachment 29877 [details]
> patch papering over the issue with TODO_do_not_ggc_collect
>
> Patch papering ove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56979
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: christian.bruel at st dot com
Target: arm-none-eabi
Created attachment 30152
--> http://gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
hmmm...
now I'm getting a different ICE:
internal compiler error: in arm_dbx_register_number, at config/arm/arm.c:25834
a gcc_unreachable () is reached.
If I print out the regno argume
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to chrbr from comment #5)
> > If I print out the regno argument to arm_dbx_register_number, it's 272 which
> > seem to me like it could be reg number in DWARF numberin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to chrbr from comment #7)
> thanks for catching it.
No problem, thanks for fixing :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to chrbr from comment #9)
> no, in fact, you confused me. The patch was committed correctly :-)
>
> > On a side note, in your patch you say:
> > - t = one_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> In any case, if you have
Err... stray line. Ignor that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57351
--- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to chrbr from comment #14)
> > In that post (comment 6) I was citing the patch you attached to this report,
> > which says:
> >
>
> OK that's clear. Wron
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42575
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jh at suse dot cz
Target: arm-none-eabi
With r199422 gcc.dg/tls/emutls-2.c started ICEing with:
$SOURCE/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/emutls-2.c: In function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> Seems to have been fixed with the "Symtab cleanups 2/17 - merge alias code"
> fix (r199577) or possibly with the same fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57473
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: bernds at codesourcery dot com, zhenqiang.chen at linaro
dot org
Target: armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
We're getting a miscompare on the 178.galgel benchma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks, Zhenqiang.
For me, it's a segfault in function DGETF2. gdb backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0001d964 in dgetf2_ ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0001d964 in dg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Please try the attached patch. If it works, I will send it for community
> review.
Hi Zhenqiang,
This seems to fix the miscompare on my setup, thanks!
I haven't ran a full regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to zhenqiang.chen from comment #7)
> Created attachment 30364 [details]
> update patch
>
>
> Please try the updated patch. Local tests: x86-64 and pandaboard bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57727
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed with 4.8.1
Works with 4.7 and current trunk 4.9 though.
Fails for -mcpu=xscale , iwmmxt and iwmmxt2
Trying to reduce...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30406
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30406&action=edit
Reduced testcase
Reduced testcase, compile with -march=armv5te -marm -mtune=xscale
-mfl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4)
> The ICE on the reduced test case started with r186147 and stopped with
> r199188.
> They both touch the same code so I believe r19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4)
> The ICE on the reduced test case started with r186147 and stopped with
> r199188.
> They both touch the same code so I believe r19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
New ICE in the testsuite when targeting arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr8081.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58084
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58084
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-none-eabi
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> Another testcases:
>
> int
> bar (int i)
> {
> return 1 | ((i * 2) & 254);
> }
>
> int
> foo (int i)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Proposed patch posted at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00361.html
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 30625
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30625&action=edit
Reduced testcase
Given the attached testcase, gcc ICEs with:
besttry.c:45:1: i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58106
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Sep 9 13:11:45 2013
New Revision: 202397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202397&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc/]
2013-09-09 Kyrylo Tkachov
PR targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Sep 9 13:16:44 2013
New Revision: 202398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202398&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-09 Kyrylo Tkachov
PR target/57735
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57735
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Sep 17 13:29:41 2013
New Revision: 202652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc/]
2013-09-17 Kyrylo Tkachov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Sep 17 13:59:42 2013
New Revision: 202653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202653&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc/]
2013-09-17 Kyrylo Tkachov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58556
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arc-elf32 |arc-elf32, arm-none-eabi
1 - 100 of 2215 matches
Mail list logo
