: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: koalinux at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42056
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42056&action=edit
segmentation fault.
Hi,
As reported here:
https://bugs.gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #1 from José Pekkarinen ---
Created attachment 42057
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42057&action=edit
strace of the failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #3 from José Pekkarinen ---
Created attachment 42060
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42060&action=edit
preprocesed sources.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #5 from José Pekkarinen ---
I reported that to gcc this morning:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #6 from José Pekkarinen ---
(In reply to José Pekkarinen from comment #5)
> I reported that to gcc this morning:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
Sorry, wrong tab.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #8 from José Pekkarinen ---
Any chance the fix would be backported to gcc 5.4.X?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #10 from José Pekkarinen ---
Not particularly, this seems to be the only piece of software in my system that
seems to use it, so I'll have to live with the elder version if this doesn't
get
backported. It would be awesome to be able t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #11 from José Pekkarinen ---
Created attachment 42192
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42192&action=edit
Backport of the patch to 5.X
In case it helps, here is a patch that backports the
revision that is supposed
