oduct: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38088
--- Comment #2 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-12 13:49 ---
Andrew (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2008-11/msg00131.html) suggested to use
#define CAP_INFINITY INTTYPE_MAXIMUM(HOST_WIDEST_INT)
I tried it out. The mcf.c compiles with this modification.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 00:02 ---
I confirm that using this patch, mcf.c compiles cleanly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38088
gnedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38100
--- Comment #1 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 20:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=16664)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16664&action=view)
output generated when configure script is run
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38106
--- Comment #2 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 20:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=16665)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16665&action=view)
output generated when make is run
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38106
ith ld:libgcc.map: file format not
recognized error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy:
--- Comment #4 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 21:44 ---
I was just using
nohup ../../unZipped/gcc-4.4-20081107/configure
--prefix=/home/kkusuman/software/myroot/gcc-4.4-20081107 2>&1 > configure.log &
I will try giving the --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld option
--- Comment #6 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 22:29 ---
Changing the configure command to
nohup ../../unZipped/gcc-4.4-20081107/configure
--prefix=/home/kkusuman/software/myroot/gcc-4.4-20081107 --with-gnu-as
--with-gnu-ld 2>&1 > configure.log &
fixed the pr
y: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38124
--- Comment #2 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-18 14:28 ---
I filed this bug against binutils as
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7032 . The conclusion there is
that it is a compiler bug
(since the abort is an unhandled case in a switch).
Could some one take a
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
--- Comment #1 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-14 22:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=17105)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17105&action=view)
code to reproduce the internal compiler error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
--- Comment #3 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-15 06:21 ---
Joost,
Did you test on the solaris machine or on the i386 machine. I think this is a
architecture specific bug. Could you please confirm the architecture of your
machine?
thanks
raju
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
porting it here.
thanks
raju
--
Summary: internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=17187)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17187&action=view)
code to reproduce the internal compiler error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981
--- Comment #3 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=17188)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17188&action=view)
preprocessed source code
produced by using
gcc -E ice.c > ice.c.ppd
--
http://gcc.gnu.or
--- Comment #5 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:14 ---
My initial guess was that it is a bug in yacc. But now I do not think so. I
have compiled bison (which supersedes yacc). I still see this bug with bison
(and no yacc).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #6 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:20 ---
Is there anyway to figure out if my gcc is still using yacc and not bison?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981
--- Comment #7 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 02:00 ---
I can't believe I am so dense... I installed bison, removed /usr/ccs/bin from
the PATH. But I forgot to recompile gcc with the new update. I was still trying
to bootstrap from the old compiler. Let me recompile gcc
--- Comment #8 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 13:51 ---
I would like to confirm that, even after recompiling gcc with bison, I am still
getting the internal compiler error. There is no yacc, no /usr/ccs/bin in $PATH
when gcc was compiled.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29441
ignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20257
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20436
--- Comment #10 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-06 21:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=17263)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17263&action=view)
reduced program which reproduces the ICE
Attaching a reduced test case which reproduces the same error.
&
--- Comment #11 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-06 21:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=17264)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17264&action=view)
preprocessed source code of ice3.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981
--- Comment #5 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-12 23:59 ---
For those reading the archives, this problem is specific to Solaris 8. The
backtrace from this ICE (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00321.html)
is similar to another problem I encountered with a C program as
--- Comment #7 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-13 04:53 ---
> So, can we close this PR as fixed?
I thought it was marked as fixed long time back (2009-01-15) by Joost. Anyway,
the answer is yes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54363
Bug #: 54363
Summary: ICE when compiling malformed struct initializers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
t gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23889
--- Additional Comments From kamaraju at gmail dot com 2005-09-15 02:11
---
Subject: Re: non intuitive behaviour of gfortran
On 15 Sep 2005 00:15:27 -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu d
: segmentation fault with gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
http
n import_export_decl, at
cp/decl2.c:2344
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45651
--- Comment #3 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2010-09-12 12:51 ---
When I tried with 4.6.0 20100828, I get the ICE at a different place.
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -fwhole-program -combine lv2log.i
sim-common.i flight-computer.i physics.i pressure_sensor.i sensors.i
--- Comment #14 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2010-09-12 13:39 ---
The reduced test case in comment #8, with options "-c -Os -fno-unit-at-a-time",
does not ICE in gcc 4.4.5 20100909, gcc 4.6.0 20100828. But it gives an ICE
with gcc 4.3.5.
Also, for sched.i, with options &q
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45724
--- Comment #2 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 20:29 ---
@Uros Bizjak
I dont understand your point in copy pasting the manual on -malign-double.
Are you saying that segmentation fault is an acceptable/expected behavior in
this case and this bug will not be fixed
--- Comment #4 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 22:26 ---
Ok. Thanks for the explanation. I appreciate it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45724
t: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21459
ary: trivial reshape operation gives erroneous results
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: kamar
40 matches
Mail list logo
