--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 02:00
---
We do not have this working for unformatted I/O. It will require frontend work
as well as library to implement. Specifically, the size of records, determined
from the output list, must be determined prior to
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 02:25
---
This bug was not a duplicate of pr27954. That was a fat fingers error that I
corrected in the PR header, but I can't delete comment #9. So as far as I know
this has not been fixed yet and neve
--- Comment #24 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-04 20:10
---
*** Bug 30701 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-04 20:10
---
Works for me on 4.3, I believe this is a duplicate of pr27954. There is no
plan at the moment to back port this to 4.2 or 4.1. Can you upgrade to 4.3?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27954
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 03:04
---
See the commentary near the top of io/unit.c . This is a basic explanation.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30617
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-07 02:10
---
>From the dictionary: obsolescent -> Going out of use; becoming obsolete;
So this means its not obsolete yet, and thus still supported.
I will fix this. Splitting hairs really, but what th
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-08 03:12
---
Try :
external fun
real fun
character(10) :: string
real a
a = fun()
print *, a,a
write(string,'(f10.6)') fun()
print *, string
end
real function fun()
print *, 'test'
fun = 1.0
end
Or
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 19:08
---
I have the backport ready and i am testing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24783
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 23:26
---
Subject: Bug 24783
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 10 23:25:55 2007
New Revision: 121804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121804
Log:
2007-02-10 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 23:30
---
Subject: Bug 24783
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 10 23:30:38 2007
New Revision: 121806
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121806
Log:
2007-02-10 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAI
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 00:25
---
Subject: Bug 24783
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 11 00:25:44 2007
New Revision: 121812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121812
Log:
2007-02-10 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 00:27
---
Subject: Bug 24783
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 11 00:26:56 2007
New Revision: 121813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121813
Log:
2007-02-10 Bernhard Fischer <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 00:28
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2 now. Backported
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 16:52
---
This works OK on gfortran 4.3.
and on my FC6 install:
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 05:41
---
I modified cpu_time_4 to just return some dummy values, and experimented a bit
with the test case. When I commented out the print statement, the exception
went away.
Here is a reduced test case.
program test2
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 00:37
---
OK, then there is a similar, not necessarily related problem in write.c.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30780
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 00:43
---
I'll give it a go. Just be patient please. :)
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 20:31
---
The patch is straight forward. Need to check for end of file after
advance_line in scanner.c in a couple of places. I just need to finish testing
and package the submit. Maybe tonight.
--
http
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 06:48
---
Subject: Bug 30779
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Feb 15 06:48:09 2007
New Revision: 121982
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121982
Log:
2007-02-14 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 06:51
---
Subject: Bug 30779
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Feb 15 06:51:42 2007
New Revision: 121983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121983
Log:
2007-02-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 07:04
---
Fixed on 4.3.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #64 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 02:50
---
I now have a machine at home here running i686-pc-gnu-linux that I plan to set
up daily compile test on. Joost, does that link in coment #63 get updated
daily?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #66 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 06:33
---
With todays trunk:
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc43/configure --prefix=/home/jerry/gcc/usr
--enable-languages=c,fortran --disable-libmudflap --enable-libgomp
Thread model: posix
gcc
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
OtherBugsDependingO 29975
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30817
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 06:54
---
I am a little out of phase here. Let me update with Rogers patch and test
again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30817
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 23:42
---
Subject: Bug 30779
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 16 23:42:11 2007
New Revision: 122059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122059
Log:
2007-02-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 23:52
---
No need to go to 4.1. This is an ICE on invalid.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary: Bootstrap failure in stage 2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot g
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 06:48
---
Subject: Bug 30681
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Feb 19 06:48:07 2007
New Revision: 122124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122124
Log:
2007-02-18 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 06:52
---
Subject: Bug 30681
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Feb 19 06:52:18 2007
New Revision: 122125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122125
Log:
2007-02-18 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-21 14:32
---
I wil investigate this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 01:23
---
Curious. I will exzmine this on the weekend.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30918
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 01:26
---
I fixed one similar to this not too long ago with E format. I will dig that up
while I am at it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30910
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 01:39
---
Correction, it was F format with .0 decimal specification, pr28354.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30910
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 14:23
---
Thanks Tobias. I suspected a connection with that patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30910
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 05:43
---
Subject: Bug 30910
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 05:43:16 2007
New Revision: 122250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122250
Log:
2007-02-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 06:29
---
Subject: Bug 30910
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 06:29:03 2007
New Revision: 122251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122251
Log:
2007-02-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 18:13
---
Subject: Bug 30910
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:13:16 2007
New Revision: 122265
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122265
Log:
2007-02-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 18:15
---
Subject: Bug 30910
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:15:27 2007
New Revision: 122266
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122266
Log:
2007-02-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 18:17
---
Subject: Bug 30681
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:16:54 2007
New Revision: 122267
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122267
Log:
2007-02-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 18:20
---
Subject: Bug 30681
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:20:01 2007
New Revision: 122269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122269
Log:
2007-02-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 18:26
---
Subject: Bug 30910
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:26:23 2007
New Revision: 122270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122270
Log:
2007-02-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 18:31
---
Subject: Bug 30910
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 23 18:30:57 2007
New Revision: 122271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122271
Log:
2007-02-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 18:35
---
Fixed on 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 18:37
---
Fixed on 4.2 and 4.3
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 00:28
---
Found it. Patch on the way.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 02:27
---
Subject: Bug 30918
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 25 02:27:17 2007
New Revision: 122307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122307
Log:
2007-02-24 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 02:30
---
Subject: Bug 30918
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 25 02:30:14 2007
New Revision: 122308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122308
Log:
2007-02-24 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 03:39
---
Subject: Bug 30918
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 25 03:39:19 2007
New Revision: 122309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122309
Log:
2007-02-24 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 03:52
---
Subject: Bug 30918
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 25 03:52:11 2007
New Revision: 122310
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122310
Log:
2007-02-24 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-25 04:00
---
Fixed on 4.3, 4.2, and 4.1
Thanaks Herald for report. Please let me know if you have any other troubles.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-06 06:08
---
Well we have not had one of these for a while. I will look into it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31051
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 03:37
---
Replying to comment #6. I am forming an opinion. Section 9.7 of the F2003
standard states:
"Backspacing over records written using list-directed or namelist formatting
is prohibited."
This imp
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 03:38
---
I will take this one, but I am not confirming its a bug yet.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 04:45
---
The garbled text is because gfortran does not default initialize variable as
some compilers do. The 'line' variable is not getting read because gfortran is
getting an error on the read, so the it is
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 06:40
---
AFAICT A backspace is not allowed for namelist files according to 9.7.1
I interpret this to mean this is invalid code.
Further, Note 9.54 states that if the preceding record read is the EOF record,
the
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 05:51
---
Here is a patch. Herald, do you want to see if this fixes it for you.
I tested here, but it does not hurt to test some more.
Index: file_pos.c
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 07:37
---
hmm, I goofed, the patch in #14 does not fix this, scratch that. However, the
problem is that test_endfile in st_rewind is incorrectly setting the AT_ENDFILE
condition. I have a patch in progress.
--
http
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 18:02
---
I believe I have a fix. I am testing now. We were not initializing a few
things when we have a record length given.
Index: io/open.c
===
--- io
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 21:51
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 9 21:51:39 2007
New Revision: 122763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122763
Log:
2007-03-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 23:55
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 9 23:55:17 2007
New Revision: 122773
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122773
Log:
2007-03-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 00:00
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 10 00:00:21 2007
New Revision: 122775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122775
Log:
2007-03-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 00:03
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 10 00:03:19 2007
New Revision: 122776
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122776
Log:
2007-03-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 00:05
---
Fixed on 4.2 and 4.3
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 08:11
---
I can confirm this on latest trunk. Its blocking bootstrap.
>From config log on objdir/gcc:
config.log:conftest.c:2: error: parse error before "me"
config.log:conftest.c:62: error: `__int64'
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-11 21:28
---
A patch has been submiited for approval for this one.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-15 01:25
---
Subject: Bug 31051
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Mar 15 01:25:27 2007
New Revision: 122940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122940
Log:
2007-03-14 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-15 01:30
---
Subject: Bug 31051
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Mar 15 01:30:05 2007
New Revision: 122942
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122942
Log:
2007-03-14 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 00:04
---
Reopening - missed part of this. Patch submitted for approval
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 00:41
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 16 00:41:36 2007
New Revision: 122970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122970
Log:
2007-03-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 01:11
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 16 01:11:01 2007
New Revision: 122973
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122973
Log:
2007-03-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 01:54
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 16 01:54:25 2007
New Revision: 122974
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122974
Log:
2007-03-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 01:57
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 16 01:57:16 2007
New Revision: 122975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122975
Log:
2007-03-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 22:57
---
I will work this one. I want to review the standard. I think we are
truncating and I am not so sure this has to do with the t1 format specifier.
We'll see.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org ch
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 23:01
---
I will fix this one.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 06:28
---
The front end is converting the integer8 to integer4 and not checking the range
of the number first. The integer value gets wrapped around and the library
sees unit=10 for this test case.
--
http
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 15:59
---
I have started looking at this. I believe its a duplicate of 31199. In using
advance=no we are failing to retain or use the information about the maximum
position reached during preceding writes.
*** This bug
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 15:59
---
*** Bug 31207 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31199
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-18 02:22
---
Heres the real problem:
Try compiling this with and without -fno-range-check.
integer*8 :: k= 68719476746
integer*8 :: k2 = 2_8**36 + 10
print *, "k=",k, k2, int(k2, kind=8), int(
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-18 18:14
---
Subject: Bug 31052
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 18 18:13:50 2007
New Revision: 123038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123038
Log:
2007-03-18 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-18 18:17
---
Subject: Bug 31052
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 18 18:17:24 2007
New Revision: 123039
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123039
Log:
2007-03-18 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86-64-pc-Linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31256
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 05:49
---
Found it. In the case of advance="no" we are not saving the maximum position
reached to be used by the following write statement. This one is subtle.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31199
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-20 00:41
---
Reply to comment #8: that was my take on this, that ifort is correct. It
passed my intuitive sense of it. Non-advancing means what it says so that the
subsequent write must continue from there and overwrite
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-20 00:44
---
I think we can do the option case fairly straight forward, after we get some of
the more serious problems fixed. :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31190
--- Comment #22 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-20 02:20
---
Error 5001 would be ERROR_OPTION_CONFLICT. There are 18 different errors
associated with that code. To find out which one, you must remove the iostat
from the offending line so that gfortran will print the
--- Comment #25 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-22 20:38
---
Created an attachment (id=13255)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13255&action=view)
Untested patch to fix regression on sixtrack
This patch reverts portions of the original patch and
--- Comment #26 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 00:13
---
Subject: Bug 31052
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 23 00:13:19 2007
New Revision: 123139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123139
Log:
2007-03-22 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 01:00
---
Turns out this is not a duplicate of 31199. However its is closel related. I
wll work this one as well.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 04:23
---
Subject: Bug 31199
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Mar 26 04:23:15 2007
New Revision: 123205
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123205
Log:
2007-03-25 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 04:41
---
Subject: Bug 31199
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Mar 26 04:41:29 2007
New Revision: 123207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123207
Log:
2007-03-25 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #31 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 07:00
---
Here is a new patch. I need someone to test on SPEC. It is very simple.
Index: transfer.c
===
*** transfer.c (revision 123205)
--- transfer.c
--- Comment #34 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 21:55
---
Regarding comment 24 and 32.
I have that downloaded and tried to compile and there are duplications of
subroutines and multiple main programs. As I get time, I intend to get it
sorted out and add it to my
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-26 22:18
---
Adding Thomas to cc.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #35 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-28 01:19
---
Subject: Bug 31052
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Mar 28 01:19:39 2007
New Revision: 123284
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123284
Log:
2007-03-27 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
701 - 800 of 3058 matches
Mail list logo
