Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-lin
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 23:37
---
This regression was with 4.2 with no compiler options. I will check 4.1 later
today.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25594
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 23:55
---
I do not see this failure with 4.1 so that pretty much points to something I
did. I will withhold my recent patches to 4.2 from 4.1 until I figure this
out. The failed line of code is:
READ( NIN, FMT
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 04:26
---
I have isolated this to the patch for PR25419. Will be studying this one some
more.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25594
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 04:39
---
Confirmed.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 06:17
---
This test case does not fail with 4.0.3. That makes this a regression.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25598
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 07:03
---
The patch in comment #2 causes PR25594.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25419
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 02:45
---
Subject: Bug 25594
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 02:45:22 2006
New Revision: 109211
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109211
Log:
2005-12-31 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 02:45
---
Subject: Bug 25419
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 02:45:22 2006
New Revision: 109211
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109211
Log:
2005-12-31 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #55 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 02:50
---
$ gfc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../main/configure --prefix=/home/jerry/gcc/usr
--enable-languages=c,fortran --disable-libmudflap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0
--- Comment #35 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 03:49
---
Subject: Bug 25139
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 03:49:00 2006
New Revision: 109212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109212
Log:
2005-12-31 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 03:49
---
Subject: Bug 25510
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 03:49:00 2006
New Revision: 109212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109212
Log:
2005-12-31 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #36 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 03:53
---
Subject: Bug 25139
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 03:53:12 2006
New Revision: 109213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109213
Log:
2005-12-31 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 04:16
---
Subject: Bug 25550
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 04:16:39 2006
New Revision: 109214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109214
Log:
2005-12-31 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 04:20
---
Subject: Bug 25550
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 04:20:41 2006
New Revision: 109215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109215
Log:
2005-12-31 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:04
---
Subject: Bug 25419
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 05:04:06 2006
New Revision: 109216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109216
Log:
2005-12-31 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:04
---
Subject: Bug 25594
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 05:04:06 2006
New Revision: 109216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109216
Log:
2005-12-31 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:06
---
Subject: Bug 25419
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 1 05:06:05 2006
New Revision: 109217
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109217
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #37 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:14
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:16
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:16
---
Completed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:19
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:21
---
Fixed on 4.2 and avoided on 4.1
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 05:36
---
I have started looking into this one.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
ectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet:
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-02 08:13
---
Submitted a new patch for approval that is a final fix for this bug.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet|4.1 |
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-03 05:30
---
Submitting patch for review.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25598
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-03 07:16
---
TL does not take into account pending spaces and skips when no bytes have been
used yet so it 'thinks' that it is at the beginning of the record and can not
go left.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot g
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 03:25
---
This is not a bug. gfortran behavior is identical to ifort.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24886
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-06 01:22
---
Subject: Bug 24268
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 6 01:21:56 2006
New Revision: 109402
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109402
Log:
2006-01-01 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-06 01:28
---
Subject: Bug 24268
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 6 01:28:40 2006
New Revision: 109404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109404
Log:
2005-01-05 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-06 01:39
---
Subject: Bug 25598
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 6 01:39:34 2006
New Revision: 109405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109405
Log:
2006-01-05 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-06 01:44
---
Subject: Bug 25598
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 6 01:44:31 2006
New Revision: 109406
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109406
Log:
2005-01-05 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-06 05:21
---
Subject: Bug 25598
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 6 05:21:01 2006
New Revision: 109408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109408
Log:
2006-01-05 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-07 00:59
---
Confirmed
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 01:53
---
Subject: Bug 24268
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 8 01:53:06 2006
New Revision: 109467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109467
Log:
2006-01-07 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 01:56
---
Subject: Bug 24268
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 8 01:56:22 2006
New Revision: 109468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109468
Log:
2005-01-07 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 02:16
---
Subject: Bug 25598
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 8 02:16:11 2006
New Revision: 109469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109469
Log:
2006-01-07 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 02:17
---
Subject: Bug 25598
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jan 8 02:17:54 2006
New Revision: 109470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109470
Log:
2005-01-07 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 02:21
---
Fixed in 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 02:22
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 09:39
---
Patch submitted for review.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25631
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 09:40
---
I will take a gander at this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 05:27
---
This one is cute. We have user space data showing up in the bytes_left
counter. Really! I may have found the root of all evils.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25697
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 03:45
---
Created an attachment (id=10618)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10618&action=view)
Prposed patch for pr 25697
Dale, can you give this s spin. I think this fixes it.
--
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 06:46
---
This is interesting. I noticed before that with the previous test case i could
get two different error message depending on the size of the data. I will have
to study this a bit closer.
BTW Thanks for the
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 00:52
---
Subject: Bug 25631
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 00:52:21 2006
New Revision: 109858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109858
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 01:06
---
Subject: Bug 25631
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 01:06:08 2006
New Revision: 109860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109860
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
ity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25835
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 02:12
---
The following chunk from fd_alloc is where the problem occurs. Get rid of
setting active to zero and the error goes away, but regression occurs in
direct_io_2.f90. Perhaps active needs to be set to zero
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 04:27
---
Subject: Bug 25631
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 04:27:31 2006
New Revision: 109868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109868
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 04:32
---
Subject: Bug 25631
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 04:32:16 2006
New Revision: 109869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109869
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 06:21
---
Subject: Bug 25697
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 06:21:28 2006
New Revision: 109870
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109870
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 06:23
---
Subject: Bug 25697
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 06:23:24 2006
New Revision: 109872
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109872
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 06:41
---
Fixed on 4.2, will commit to 4.1 in a few days. PR 25835 remains a separate
problem. Cases in comment #8 and #9 go to PR25835.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25697
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25697
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 06:48
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 05:32
---
Well, I have found the problem here, but still need to formulate the solution.
For internal units, if the bytes left in a record is zero we break out of the
next_record_w function. Not a good thing
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-22 03:14
---
Subject: Bug 28339
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 22 03:14:27 2006
New Revision: 115670
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115670
Log:
2006-07-21 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-22 03:18
---
Subject: Bug 28339
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 22 03:18:33 2006
New Revision: 115671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115671
Log:
2006-07-21 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-22 06:05
---
Fixed on 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-23 16:17
---
I don't think it's a curse, but its spooky. :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27964
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 00:18
---
Subject: Bug 25289
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 24 00:17:52 2006
New Revision: 115698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115698
Log:
2006-07-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 00:19
---
Subject: Bug 25289
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 24 00:19:45 2006
New Revision: 115700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115700
Log:
2006-07-23 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 00:26
---
Subject: Bug 25289
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 24 00:26:08 2006
New Revision: 115702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115702
Log:
2006-07-24 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 01:47
---
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 26 01:47:13 2006
New Revision: 115750
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115750
Log:
2006-07-25 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 01:51
---
Patch was committed also, but I messed up pr number in ChangeLog. Fixed that.
This PR is fixed in 4.2 only.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 01:01
---
OK , simple enough. Will do shortly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 05:13
---
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 27 05:12:59 2006
New Revision: 115771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115771
Log:
2006-07-26 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 05:14
---
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 27 05:14:19 2006
New Revision: 115772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115772
Log:
2006-07-26 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 14:56
---
Lately, unless someone requests, I have not been committing to 4.1 branch.
However, since you asked, I will gladly do so. BTW Thanks for the bug reports.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 16:47
---
Subject: Bug 28339
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jul 28 16:46:57 2006
New Revision: 115798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115798
Log:
2006-07-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 16:49
---
Subject: Bug 28339
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jul 28 16:48:58 2006
New Revision: 115799
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115799
Log:
2006-07-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-29 05:12
---
Fixed on 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 00:09
---
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 00:09:16 2006
New Revision: 115828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115828
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 00:15
---
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 00:15:08 2006
New Revision: 115829
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115829
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 01:32
---
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 01:32:38 2006
New Revision: 115835
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115835
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 01:36
---
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 01:36:44 2006
New Revision: 115836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115836
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 01:57
---
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 01:57:25 2006
New Revision: 115837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115837
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 02:02
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2. Please accept my apologies.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 21:17
---
This test is expected to fail on platforms that do not support large file I/O
so we just need to mark it as xfail for this platform. Can you do that John?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28607
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-05 02:15
---
>From F95 Standard: 9.3.4.9 "DELIM = " in OPEN statement
If the value of this specifier is NONE, a character value when written
shall not be delimited by apostrophes or quotation marks,nor shall
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-05 02:17
---
S/specifier/specifier/ Copy garbage from PDF file, sorry.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28607
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 23:03
---
Subject: Bug 25828
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Aug 15 23:03:28 2006
New Revision: 116171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116171
Log:
2006-08-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 23:06
---
Subject: Bug 25828
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Aug 15 23:06:44 2006
New Revision: 116172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116172
Log:
2006-08-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 23:14
---
Subject: Bug 25828
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Aug 15 23:14:03 2006
New Revision: 116173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116173
Log:
2006-08-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 03:04
---
OK, I have an XP box up and running. Now to get a build going here and I may
be able to look into this one. Was this with the cygwin or mingw versio that
had the problem, or both?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
st
--
Summary: Empty write STREAM I/O file positioning problem
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 03:14
---
Fixed on 4.2. Will not go to 4.1
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 16:08
---
Created an attachment (id=12093)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12093&action=view)
assembly output for reduced case
There is wrong code generated setting up the parameters for the
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 16:12
---
Simplified test case used in discussion above.
program streamtest
implicit none
real, dimension(2,3) :: anarray
open(10, file="teststream", access="stream", form="unformatted"
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 16:29
---
Using -fdump-tree-final_cleanup all looks OK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28747
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 20:54
---
Here is a debug trace showing the steps leading up to the mutation of the dtp
pointer. StevebB on IRC indicated that the assembly output on linux x86-64
natch the freebsd version I posted here and the problem
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 03:29
---
Here is a comparison of no optimization and with -O1. Does this code look the
same on x86-64 that is not FreeBSD?
Code with no optimization: This does not work.
call_gfortran_st_write_done
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 16:52
---
I think this confirms the problem is in __gthrw_(pthread_mutex_unlock) (mutex)
on FreeBSD.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28747
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 00:25
---
I will take this on,
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 04:19
---
I can temporarily delete this test until I can come up with a better approach.
On my linux system the actual disk space used is less then 100 bytes even
though it logically consumes a huge amount. It depends on
501 - 600 of 3058 matches
Mail list logo
