--- Comment #22 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-10 12:32
---
Thanks for reduced test.
$ ./a.out >badfile
$ xxd badfile
000: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 33203
010: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 33003.
The NULL in
--- Comment #25 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-11 01:29
---
Changing priority to normal.
I have a patch that fixes the reduced test case. Testing CP2K now.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #26 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-11 02:25
---
CP2K still fails. However, I think I have discovered the root cause. String
constants in formats are saved in the fnode at sting.p which is a pointer.
When we use cached parsed string data, those constant
--- Comment #28 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-11 12:49
---
Subject: Bug 40330
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jun 11 12:49:35 2009
New Revision: 148391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148391
Log:
2009-06-11 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #29 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-11 14:58
---
Fixed on 4.4.1, 4.5 in review process.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 18:08
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #33 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-14 00:59
---
Patch tested on Cygwin and submitted for approval. Need a tester for mingw.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-21 12:58
---
I see no memory issues or memory growth on x85-64-linux-gnu with -m64 or -m32.
This appears to be target specific. Checked with 4.4.1 and latest trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40508
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-21 17:34
---
I don't doubt there is a problem. Not found with valgrind either on x86-64
linux.
It's hard to debug when you can't see the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40508
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-21 18:50
---
Confirmed. Problem narrowed down to format hashing not getting freed by Richi
on IRC. I had the problem bypassed on my trunk by another patch.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-23 00:16
---
Subject: Bug 40508
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Jun 23 00:16:24 2009
New Revision: 148823
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148823
Log:
2009-06-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #31 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-26 15:50
---
I am working on some ideas here. We are getting double free or corruption
related to free_format_data. I think it is because we have two pointers to pay
attention to. The one in the hash table and dtp
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 02:07
---
I will have a look.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 04:09
---
I can confirm the regression is from the I/O patch, but not related to format
caching. The test case is looping here:
(gdb) bt
#0 mem_alloc_w () at ../../../gcc45/libgfortran/io/unix.c:579
#1 mem_write (s
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 04:35
---
I think this fixes it. Still testing. Will need to get this into 4.4 if this
is it. This fix is consistent with fd_set in 4.3 which loops as long as trans
> 0. (similar code)
Index: transfe
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 00:46
---
Subject: Bug 40576
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Jun 30 00:46:35 2009
New Revision: 149075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149075
Log:
2009-06-29 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 00:52
---
Subject: Bug 40576
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Jun 30 00:52:06 2009
New Revision: 149077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149077
Log:
2009-06-29 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 00:55
---
Fixed on 4.4 and 4.5, closing. Thanks to Thomas for report and reduced test
case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40576
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 01:47
---
Closed.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 18:15
---
Complete.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-03 15:20
---
I will add that I suspect that the bug may be latent in 4.5 since I did change
the error code when I added NEWUNIT to 4.5. After we get to the bottom of it,
we need to consider backporting a fix to 4.4 since
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-03 15:16
---
I can reproduce the problem on 4.3 and 4.4.
I would like to investigate further, especially regarding 4.4 and what did we
change between 4.4 and 4.5 to fix this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-03 23:24
---
Yes, I have the patch already. Its a one liner.
Index: trans-io.c
===
--- trans-io.c (revision 149123)
+++ trans-io.c (working copy)
@@ -471,7
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 03:07
---
Subject: Bug 40638
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 4 03:07:12 2009
New Revision: 149218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149218
Log:
2009-07-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 04:05
---
Subject: Bug 40638
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 4 04:05:19 2009
New Revision: 149219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149219
Log:
2009-07-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 04:17
---
Subject: Bug 40638
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 4 04:16:59 2009
New Revision: 149220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149220
Log:
2009-07-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 04:20
---
Subject: Bug 40638
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 4 04:20:24 2009
New Revision: 149221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149221
Log:
2009-07-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 04:25
---
Subject: Bug 40638
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 4 04:25:20 2009
New Revision: 149222
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149222
Log:
2009-07-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 04:28
---
Fixed on 4.3 and 4.4. Added new test case to 4.5 as well as 4.3 and 4.4
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 19:47
---
*** Bug 40652 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 19:47
---
see PR40638 which was recently reported and fixed yesterday. There is a patch
in the PR
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 40638 ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 21:29
---
I am on cygwin-1.5. will these fixes get pushed to setup? or am I stuck? or is
there a work around?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 23:52
---
I was resisting the change to 1.7 because the website states "Beta".
I will go ahead and do so now. :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #32 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 02:12
---
I am getting close now. I have a patch that actually passes the CP2K test case
and regression testing. It turns out that the parse_format_list function is
called recursively so one must be careful about
--- Comment #33 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 12:25
---
Created an attachment (id=18138)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18138&action=view)
Patch ready for testing
Joost, if you can, please test this patch on all of CP2K. Other testors
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-06 18:12
---
Yes indeed it is fixed with my patch of this morning. This is the reduced test
case we can use for the test suite.
Thanks for the report Michael!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40662
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-06 19:45
---
2 cents. Memory is cheap, very cheap. When you can buy a x86-64 based laptop
with 3 gig for under 500 dollars, it does not matter that much.
Now, if you are doing embedded systems, that may be a different tune
--- Comment #34 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 01:20
---
Subject: Bug 40330
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 9 01:20:23 2009
New Revision: 149398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149398
Log:
2009-07-08 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 01:20
---
Subject: Bug 40662
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 9 01:20:23 2009
New Revision: 149398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149398
Log:
2009-07-08 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #35 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 01:55
---
Subject: Bug 40330
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 9 01:54:47 2009
New Revision: 149399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149399
Log:
2009-07-08 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 01:55
---
Subject: Bug 40662
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 9 01:54:47 2009
New Revision: 149399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149399
Log:
2009-07-08 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #36 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 01:59
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 02:01
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 02:02
---
Fixed.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 02:13
---
I will take this one on.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 15:15
---
Marked as regression. Not platform specific. I confirmed this on x86-64
Linux.
We have an illegal seek in transfer.c (next_record_w_unf) at line 2824.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 17:16
---
Another aspect of this bug. If we do this:
PROGRAM test
OPEN(UNIT=32,FILE="fort.32",STATUS="NEW",ACCESS="SEQUENTIAL",FORM="UNFORMATTED")
!READ(32,END=100)
100 CONT
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-13 18:12
---
Try compiling without these:
-lgfortranbegin -lgfortran
Should not need to do this. Lets see what it does.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40734
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-16 01:31
---
I was trying to do it in hit_eof after the return from the error. I have not
figured it out yet. I will keep trying, but hope you find it first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40714
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-16 03:23
---
Taking myself off of this one.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #34 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 13:43
---
Cygwin only patch submitted. MingW next.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 23:10
---
Subject: Bug 40714
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 19 23:10:22 2009
New Revision: 149795
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149795
Log:
2009-07-19 Janne Blomqvist
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 23:22
---
Subject: Bug 40714
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 19 23:22:37 2009
New Revision: 149796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149796
Log:
2009-07-19 Janne Blomqvist
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 23:26
---
Subject: Bug 40714
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 19 23:26:20 2009
New Revision: 149797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149797
Log:
2009-07-19 Janne Blomqvist
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 23:44
---
Fixed on 4.5.0 and 4.4.1. Thanks for bug report.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-21 05:04
---
Works OK on i86-64-linux. I also ran the original test programs on Cygwin and
results are also OK all the way through.
I wonder if we can get another mingw attempt
Note: 4 Gb file here.
--
http
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-22 00:02
---
Is there a particular reason why we can not change this to off_t with 4.5.?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39654
--- Comment #35 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 00:59
---
Subject: Bug 32784
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 23 00:58:46 2009
New Revision: 149970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149970
Log:
2009-07-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-25 16:46
---
There are two things going on here. First, because of the continuation, the
scanner actually combines the two lines into one line. Secondly, we have code
that deliberately clears the truncation flag because it
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 02:00
---
I will get started on this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 03:09
---
As a work-around, re-arranging the derived type like this:
type tao_plot_page_struct
real size(2)
real shape_height_max
type (tao_title_struct) title
end type
May help, until I get this sorted
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 04:40
---
Created an attachment (id=18265)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18265&action=view)
A simple patch to resolve the problem
This patch solves the original test case. It does
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-01 15:42
---
Patch submitted for approval:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg1.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40853
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 18:31
---
Subject: Bug 40853
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Aug 2 18:31:07 2009
New Revision: 150356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150356
Log:
2009-08-02 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 18:48
---
Subject: Bug 40853
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Aug 2 18:47:46 2009
New Revision: 150357
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150357
Log:
2009-08-02 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-05 03:15
---
Subject: Bug 40853
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Aug 5 03:15:18 2009
New Revision: 150476
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150476
Log:
2009-08-04 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-05 03:18
---
Subject: Bug 40853
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Aug 5 03:17:52 2009
New Revision: 150477
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150477
Log:
2009-08-04 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-05 03:19
---
Fixed on 4.4 and 4.5, closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-07 16:06
---
The problem is that the error locus is at the end of the line rather then the
end of the non-whitespace characters of the related statement.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
ecifier fails on end-of-record
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdeli
urrent_record = 0;
break;
}
}
Test results to follow:
--
Summary: Bad write after backing up from end of file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assigned
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 23:58
---
Testing that patch gives the following results. I will put together a test
case and commit this as obvious unless there are objections.
hex dump of TEST file created using gfortran 4.0.1 gives, with no patch
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 01:46
---
This is precisly when I committed the patch to pr24489. I am also seeing some
possible connections with pr24699. I will investigate further.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24719
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 02:18
---
I have confirmed that when I revert the patch to pr24489 that this bug goes
away. Isn't life wonderful!
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 06:22
---
I believe I have a fix for this one that works with the previous patch to
pr24489. I am testing along with work on pr24699 to make sure we have no
conflicts or regressions. pr24719, pr24699, pr24700, and
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 02:07
---
Another trasnfer.c bug possibly. I will investigate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24785
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 02:16
---
Confirmed on 4.1 and 4.0.3
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 16:32
---
Confirmed in 4.1
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 16:38
---
This works fine in 4.1 with my upcoming patches. Hex dump of file looks good.
May be a duplicate of pr24700.
Could someone else try this with an unpatched tree so I don't have to mess with
my very delic
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 18:52
---
Well that confirms the bug and the fix is ready to be committed shortly.
Thanks Steve
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24700 ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 18:52
---
*** Bug 24796 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 20:19
---
Subject: Bug 24699
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Nov 11 20:19:21 2005
New Revision: 106797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106797
Log:
2005-11-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 20:31
---
Subject: Bug 24489
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Nov 11 20:31:06 2005
New Revision: 106798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106798
Log:
2005-11-11 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 20:31
---
Subject: Bug 24699
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Nov 11 20:31:06 2005
New Revision: 106798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106798
Log:
2005-11-11 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 20:31
---
Subject: Bug 24719
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Nov 11 20:31:06 2005
New Revision: 106798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106798
Log:
2005-11-11 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 20:31
---
Subject: Bug 24584
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Nov 11 20:31:06 2005
New Revision: 106798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106798
Log:
2005-11-11 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 20:31
---
Subject: Bug 24785
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Nov 11 20:31:06 2005
New Revision: 106798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106798
Log:
2005-11-11 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 22:22
---
Subject: Bug 24584
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 12 22:22:53 2005
New Revision: 106838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106838
Log:
2005-11-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 22:22
---
Subject: Bug 24699
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 12 22:22:53 2005
New Revision: 106838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106838
Log:
2005-11-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 22:31
---
Subject: Bug 24719
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 12 22:31:18 2005
New Revision: 106839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106839
Log:
2005-11-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 22:31
---
Subject: Bug 24785
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 12 22:31:18 2005
New Revision: 106839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106839
Log:
2005-11-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 22:31
---
Subject: Bug 24699
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 12 22:31:18 2005
New Revision: 106839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106839
Log:
2005-11-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 22:31
---
Subject: Bug 24584
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 12 22:31:18 2005
New Revision: 106839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106839
Log:
2005-11-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 23:13
---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and 4.1
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 23:13
---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and 4.1.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 23:20
---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and 4.1
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 23:21
---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and 4.1 .
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 23:22
---
Fixed in 4.0.3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24584
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 00:47
---
This is near stuff I am working on so I will work it.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
301 - 400 of 3058 matches
Mail list logo
