[Bug target/78838] msp430 option -mcode-region=either, -ffunction-sections, and interrupt function attributes cause incorrect section to be created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78838 jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status

[Bug target/78554] Internal Compiler Error in msp430 target with -mlarge, -O{s123}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78554 jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/58507] Incorrect parsing of `-mmcu=msp430*`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58507 jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/70320] msp430 asm volatile does not accept lower-case register names in clobber list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70320 jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/71133] msp430-elf -mlarge FTBFS in libstdc++-v3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71133 jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/66156] [msp430] wrong code generated with -O2 -mlarge (zero extension HI -> SI)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66156 jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug ipa/96430] New: internal compiler error: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:354

Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The GCC selftest "range_tests" is failing for msp430-elf sin

[Bug tree-optimization/96458] New: [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8075 for msp430-elf

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 48993 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48

[Bug target/70320] msp430 asm volatile does not accept lower-case register names in clobber list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70320 --- Comment #1 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Mon Jul 29 19:21:18 2019 New Revision: 273883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273883&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Allow both upper and lower case 'r' in re

[Bug target/91306] [MSP430] libgcc/crtstuff.c: Alignment of frame_dummy .init_array entry is too big

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91306 --- Comment #5 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Fri Aug 23 09:21:26 2019 New Revision: 274846 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274846&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-08-23 Jozef Lawrynowicz PR targ

[Bug testsuite/89258] [9 Regression] verify_gimple failed in gimple test pr80887 for 16-bit target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89258 --- Comment #2 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Fri Feb 8 16:47:28 2019 New Revision: 268704 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268704&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-08 Jozef Lawrynowicz PR testsui

[Bug middle-end/86705] [7/8/9 Regression] pr45678-2.c ICE with msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86705 --- Comment #2 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Tue Jul 31 18:17:00 2018 New Revision: 263177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263177&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/86705 * gcc/cfg

[Bug middle-end/86705] [7/8/9 Regression] pr45678-2.c ICE with msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86705 --- Comment #3 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Thu Aug 2 20:36:14 2018 New Revision: 263277 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263277&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-02 Jozef Lawrynowicz Backp

[Bug middle-end/86705] [7/8/9 Regression] pr45678-2.c ICE with msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86705 --- Comment #4 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Thu Aug 2 20:54:02 2018 New Revision: 263279 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263279&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-02 Jozef Lawrynowicz Backp

[Bug target/86662] [7/8/9 Regression] msp430-elf segfault with -flto and -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86662 --- Comment #3 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Mon Aug 6 10:29:17 2018 New Revision: 263332 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263332&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/86662 * gc

[Bug target/86662] [7/8/9 Regression] msp430-elf segfault with -flto and -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86662 --- Comment #4 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Sat Aug 25 11:52:15 2018 New Revision: 263852 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263852&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline PR target/86662 * gc

[Bug target/86662] [7/8/9 Regression] msp430-elf segfault with -flto and -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86662 --- Comment #5 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Sat Aug 25 12:10:28 2018 New Revision: 263853 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263853&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline PR target/86662 * gc

[Bug c/87691] transparent_union attribute does not work with MODE_PARTIAL_INT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87691 --- Comment #10 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Wed Nov 7 22:06:26 2018 New Revision: 265894 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265894&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-07 Jozef Lawrynowicz PR

[Bug target/87927] ICE: segmentation fault with patchable_function_entry attribute for msp430-elf -mlarge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87927 --- Comment #5 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Fri Nov 16 23:53:30 2018 New Revision: 266226 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266226&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-16 Jozef Lawrynowicz PR targ

[Bug middle-end/87854] [9 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr46534.c ICE for 16-bit size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854 --- Comment #11 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jozefl Date: Sat Nov 17 00:45:43 2018 New Revision: 266230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-11-17 Jozef Lawrynowicz PR middle-e

[Bug c++/97798] New: FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- GCC fails to build for msp430-el

[Bug c++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #2 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 49547 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49547&action=edit tester.ii (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > Would it be possible to

[Bug libstdc++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #9 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > My attempt to build msp430 fails with: > > In file included from > /home/jwakely/gcc/msp430-elf/msp430-elf/include

[Bug libstdc++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #12 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks! I've set off a full msp430-elf build and regtest. I'll look at backporting it to GCC8/9/10 branches after testing.

[Bug libstdc++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #14 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > I tried a bootstrap of gcc-10 and I get this error during libgcc/configure > > conftest.s: Assembler messages: > conftest.s:168: Er

[Bug libstdc++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #16 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #15) > Hmm, I get the same error for a out-of-tree binutils built from today's git > sources: > > GNU assembler (GNU Binutils)

[Bug libstdc++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #19 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #18) > The patch will apply cleanly to gcc-10 but not gcc-9. Let me know if you > want me to prepare a patch for the gcc-9 branch. If it's n

[Bug libstdc++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #23 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22) > I tested the patches on x86_64-linux and confirmed that the branches can > bootstrap msp430-elf, so I went ahead and pushed them. > &g

[Bug target/98121] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/98121] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 --- Comment #4 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > The issue here is that what should happen when definitions marked with used > attribute and unmarked definitions are put in the same section. It has > nothing > to

[Bug other/98121] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 --- Comment #7 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6) > (In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #4) > > GAS merges the "R" flag state in .section declarations, silently, and with > > logical OR, and GCC should

[Bug other/98121] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 --- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- (In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #7) > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6) > > (In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #4) > > > GAS merges the "R" flag state in .section declarati

[Bug target/98146] New: [11 Regression] section type conflict when "used" attribute is applied to decl with specific section

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- For targets that support the SHF_GNU_RETAIN ELF section flag, the "used" at

[Bug target/98121] [11 Regression] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 Jozef Lawrynowicz changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug target/98210] [11 Regression] SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210 --- Comment #4 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- Since gold is not built by default, should we just disable SHF_GNU_RETAIN support if gold has been built at all, for Binutils versions without the gold patch. There's 2 weeks between the GCC "used" imply

[Bug target/98210] [11 Regression] SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210 --- Comment #6 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- I've posted a patch where the HAVE_GAS_SHF_GNU_RETAIN configure test has been extended to check for SHF_GNU_RETAIN gold support: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/562100.html

[Bug target/98210] [11 Regression] SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210 --- Comment #9 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- I believe this PR only relates to the fact that GCC support for SHF_GNU_RETAIN was available before GOLD supported that section flag. My proposed patch was to turn off GCC support for SHF_GNU_RETAIN if a

[Bug target/98210] [11 Regression] SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210 Jozef Lawrynowicz changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|REOPENED