[Bug target/40457] use stm and ldm to access consecutive memory words

-- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug c++/42556] Unnecessary generation of a zero initializer for array with C++

--- Comment #2 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-15 05:34 --- I'm looking at this bug. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |

[Bug target/40457] use stm and ldm to access consecutive memory words

--- Comment #10 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 09:08 --- Not working on this. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo

[Bug c++/42556] Unnecessary generation of a zero initializer for array with C++

--- Comment #3 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-23 08:55 --- My patch for this bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg01039.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42556

[Bug c++/41183] [4.4 Regression] ICE compiling chromium

--- Comment #11 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 16:35 --- Created an attachment (id=20198) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20198&action=view) Another patch This is another patch by copying cfun->language to clone. -- http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug c++/43024] [4.4 Regression] ICE on template code with -O2 or -O3, regression from 4.4.2

--- Comment #13 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-26 14:31 --- Subject: Bug 43024 Author: jiez Date: Fri Mar 26 14:30:49 2010 New Revision: 157750 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157750 Log: 2010-03-26 Volker Reichelt PR c++/43024

[Bug middle-end/43562] New: GCC ICE on optimize attribute

Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43562

[Bug middle-end/43562] GCC ICE on optimize attribute

--- Comment #1 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-29 03:39 --- Created an attachment (id=20243) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20243&action=view) The test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43562

[Bug middle-end/41150] segmentation fault after using __attribute__((optimize()))

--- Comment #10 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 02:41 --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #4) > > bug2-susan.i does not crash ICE on GCC SVN trunk now. > > > > Do you mean bug2-susan.i does not exist on GCC 4.5? > I don&#x

[Bug middle-end/43574] [4.5 Regression] Revision 157795 failed gcc.dg/lto/20090914-1 c_lto_20090914-1_0.o

--- Comment #2 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 03:56 --- I'm testing a patch. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Assig

[Bug other/43562] GCC ICE on optimize attribute

--- Comment #7 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 04:06 --- A new patch is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg01375.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43562

[Bug middle-end/43574] [4.5 Regression] Revision 157795 failed gcc.dg/lto/20090914-1 c_lto_20090914-1_0.o

--- Comment #3 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-30 09:20 --- The patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg01395.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43574

[Bug middle-end/43574] [4.5 Regression] Revision 157795 failed gcc.dg/lto/20090914-1 c_lto_20090914-1_0.o

--- Comment #4 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 01:46 --- A new patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg01440.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43574

[Bug other/43562] GCC ICE on optimize attribute

--- Comment #8 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 02:44 --- Subject: Bug 43562 Author: jiez Date: Wed Mar 31 02:44:10 2010 New Revision: 157849 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157849 Log: PR 43562 * reload.h (caller_save_initi

[Bug other/43562] GCC ICE on optimize attribute

--- Comment #9 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 02:51 --- Subject: Bug 43562 Author: jiez Date: Wed Mar 31 02:51:31 2010 New Revision: 157850 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157850 Log: PR 43562 * reload.h (caller_save_initi

[Bug other/43562] GCC ICE on optimize attribute

--- Comment #10 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 02:54 --- Should be fixed now on trunk and 4.4 branch. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/43574] [4.5 Regression] Revision 157795 failed gcc.dg/lto/20090914-1 c_lto_20090914-1_0.o

--- Comment #5 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 09:57 --- Subject: Bug 43574 Author: jiez Date: Wed Mar 31 09:57:03 2010 New Revision: 157859 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157859 Log: PR 43574 * opt-functions.awk (var_typ

[Bug middle-end/43574] [4.5 Regression] Revision 157795 failed gcc.dg/lto/20090914-1 c_lto_20090914-1_0.o

--- Comment #6 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 09:58 --- Should be fixed now. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug debug/42767] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

--- Comment #7 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 12:01 --- This bug should have been fixed. Close. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/42556] Unnecessary generation of a zero initializer for array with C++

--- Comment #4 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 10:14 --- Subject: Bug 42556 Author: jiez Date: Wed Apr 7 10:14:45 2010 New Revision: 158047 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158047 Log: cp/ PR c++/42556 * t

[Bug c++/42556] Unnecessary generation of a zero initializer for array with C++

--- Comment #5 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 10:19 --- The patch I committed for this PR: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00174.html -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/30913] SRA bugs with anon bitfields

--- Comment #3 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-09 10:58 --- It's not reproducible on svn trunk now. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |

[Bug regression/43713] New: False set but not used warning

AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43713

[Bug regression/43713] False set but not used warning

--- Comment #1 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-10 08:54 --- Caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00317.html -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug regression/43713] False set but not used warning

--- Comment #2 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-10 08:56 --- The patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00347.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43713

[Bug target/43417] SH: 4.4 ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2604

--- Comment #7 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-10 11:43 --- For the record, -m4 is needed to reproduce this issue. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/43417] SH: 4.4 ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2604

--- Comment #8 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-10 15:12 --- Subject: Bug 43417 Author: jiez Date: Sat Apr 10 15:12:14 2010 New Revision: 158192 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158192 Log: PR target/43417 * gcc.target/sh/pr4341

[Bug target/43417] SH: 4.4 ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2604

--- Comment #9 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-10 15:14 --- Subject: Bug 43417 Author: jiez Date: Sat Apr 10 15:14:13 2010 New Revision: 158193 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158193 Log: PR target/43417 * gcc.target/sh/pr4341

[Bug target/43417] SH: 4.4 ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2604

--- Comment #10 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-10 15:17 --- Subject: Bug 43417 Author: jiez Date: Sat Apr 10 15:17:15 2010 New Revision: 158194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158194 Log: PR target/43417 * gcc.target/sh/pr4341

[Bug target/43662] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in insert_save with ms_abi attribute

--- Comment #5 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-10 15:29 --- The patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00466.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43662

[Bug other/43791] kernel/rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error: in cgraph_decide_inlining_of_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1009

--- Comment #2 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-19 07:24 --- Justin, You can add V=1 when make linux kernel. Then you can find the command line used to compile rtmutex.c. Change -c in the command line to -E and return the command line. Rename the resulted rtmutex.o to rtmutex.i

[Bug target/43662] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in insert_save with ms_abi attribute

--- Comment #11 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-19 07:24 --- Thanks all. This is the updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01157.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43662

[Bug target/43662] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in insert_save with ms_abi attribute

--- Comment #12 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-19 10:03 --- Subject: Bug 43662 Author: jiez Date: Mon Apr 19 10:02:52 2010 New Revision: 158509 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158509 Log: PR target/43662 * reginfo.c (reinit_re

[Bug target/43662] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in insert_save with ms_abi attribute

--- Comment #13 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-19 10:05 --- Subject: Bug 43662 Author: jiez Date: Mon Apr 19 10:04:43 2010 New Revision: 158510 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158510 Log: PR target/43662 * reginfo.c (reinit_re

[Bug target/43662] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in insert_save with ms_abi attribute

--- Comment #14 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-19 10:06 --- Subject: Bug 43662 Author: jiez Date: Mon Apr 19 10:06:13 2010 New Revision: 158511 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158511 Log: PR target/43662 * reginfo.c (reinit_re

[Bug target/43662] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in insert_save with ms_abi attribute

--- Comment #15 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-19 10:10 --- Should be fixed now on trunk, 4.5 and 4.4 branches. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43662

[Bug middle-end/43833] New: false warning: array subscript is above array bounds with -O3

ponent: middle-end AssignedTo: jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43833

[Bug tree-optimization/43833] false warning: array subscript is above array bounds with -O3

--- Comment #1 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 14:48 --- The patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01304.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43833

[Bug tree-optimization/43833] false warning: array subscript is above array bounds with -O3

--- Comment #2 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-23 07:23 --- Updated patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01386.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43833

[Bug tree-optimization/43833] false warning: array subscript is above array bounds with -O3

--- Comment #3 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-26 10:59 --- Subject: Bug 43833 Author: jiez Date: Mon Apr 26 10:59:34 2010 New Revision: 158727 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158727 Log: PR tree-optimization/43833 * tr

[Bug tree-optimization/43833] false warning: array subscript is above array bounds with -O3

--- Comment #4 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-26 11:00 --- Subject: Bug 43833 Author: jiez Date: Mon Apr 26 10:59:48 2010 New Revision: 158728 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158728 Log: PR tree-optimization/43833 * tr

[Bug debug/42767] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

--- Comment #4 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-17 10:19 --- Subject: Bug 42767 Author: jiez Date: Sun Jan 17 10:19:22 2010 New Revision: 155974 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155974 Log: PR debug/42767 * dwarf2out.c (mem_loc_de

[Bug target/44290] [4.5 Regression] __naked attribute is broken

--- Comment #21 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:48 --- Subject: Bug 44290 Author: jiez Date: Fri Jul 23 14:47:46 2010 New Revision: 162466 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162466 Log: PR target/44290 * attribs.c (decl_at

[Bug target/44290] [4.5 Regression] __naked attribute is broken

--- Comment #22 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:51 --- Should be fixed on trunk now. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/44290] [4.5 Regression] __naked attribute is broken

--- Comment #23 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 14:52 --- Set the status to FIXED. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/44290] [4.5 only] __naked attribute is broken

--- Comment #25 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-26 14:37 --- Ramana, I will ask for permission to commit it on 4.5 branch when it's unfrozen. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290

[Bug target/44290] [4.5 only] __naked attribute is broken

--- Comment #26 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-27 17:34 --- Subject: Bug 44290 Author: jiez Date: Tue Jul 27 17:33:30 2010 New Revision: 162579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162579 Log: PR target/44290 Revert 2010-07

[Bug tree-optimization/45144] New: SRA optimization issue of bit-field

AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45144

[Bug tree-optimization/45144] SRA optimization issue of bit-field

--- Comment #3 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-02 04:34 --- Aggregates Copy Propagation should be able to fix this, too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45144

[Bug driver/45163] New: -save-temps=obj does not work correctly

nu dot org ReportedBy: jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45163

[Bug driver/45163] -save-temps=obj does not work correctly with -fdum-tree- options

--- Comment #1 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-02 08:43 --- Make the summary more specific. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/45144] SRA optimization issue of bit-field

--- Comment #4 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-05 03:06 --- Subject: Bug 45144 Author: jiez Date: Thu Aug 5 03:05:35 2010 New Revision: 162897 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162897 Log: PR tree-optimization/45144 * tr

[Bug bootstrap/43994] [4.6 Regression] Revision 159063 failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64

--- Comment #8 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-06 16:35 --- I see similar issue on ARM target. It seems to be fixed by the patch in comment #6 . -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/44820] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: regno set but unused in arm_attr_length_move_neon

--- Comment #2 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 09:11 --- Subject: Bug 44820 Author: jiez Date: Mon Jul 5 09:11:39 2010 New Revision: 161822 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161822 Log: 2010-07-05 Mikael Pettersson PR bootstr

[Bug bootstrap/44820] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: regno set but unused in arm_attr_length_move_neon

--- Comment #3 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 09:15 --- Sorry for causing this. Thanks for your fix. I have committed it for you. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/44820] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: regno set but unused in arm_attr_length_move_neon

--- Comment #5 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 12:45 --- Subject: Bug 44820 Author: jiez Date: Mon Jul 5 12:45:19 2010 New Revision: 161833 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161833 Log: 2010-07-05 Mikael Pettersson PR bootstr

[Bug target/44888] Stack pointer corruption within interrupt routine when compiled with -Os

--- Comment #2 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 09:57 --- Ramana, I will do it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44888

[Bug target/44888] Stack pointer corruption within interrupt routine when compiled with -Os

--- Comment #3 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 14:06 --- My patch has been committed on trunk and 4.5 branch. This bug should be fixed now. Please verify. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44888

[Bug target/44888] Stack pointer corruption within interrupt routine when compiled with -Os

--- Comment #4 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-12 14:07 --- The updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg00968.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44888

[Bug bootstrap/44921] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

voids a call to rtx_cost when no optimization can be performed. OTOH with the expensive loop through all hard registers that's in the noise. Or compared to the cycles wasted on failed bootstraps or this discussion ;-) --- Comment #8 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 09:51 --- C

[Bug bootstrap/44921] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

--- Comment #9 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 09:52 --- I think this one caused it: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg03103.html The test case is attached. $ ./cc1 -O2 -Wall testcase.i -quiet testcase.i: In function 'reload_cse_regs': testcase.

[Bug bootstrap/44921] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

--- Comment #10 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 16:20 --- Created an attachment (id=21191) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21191&action=view) The reduced test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44921

[Bug bootstrap/44921] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

--- Comment #11 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 16:40 --- Created an attachment (id=21192) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21192&action=view) The reduced test case -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|