[Bug debug/100255] New: Crosscompiler to ia64-hp-vms: vmsdbgout.c:368:20: error: ISO C++17 does not allow 'register' storage class specifier [-Werror=register]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100255 Bug ID: 100255 Summary: Crosscompiler to ia64-hp-vms: vmsdbgout.c:368:20: error: ISO C++17 does not allow 'register' storage class specifier [-Werror=register] Product: gcc

[Bug c/100268] New: lm32-uclinux: ../.././gcc/config/lm32/uclinux-elf.h:70: error: "LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC" redefined [-Werror]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100268 Bug ID: 100268 Summary: lm32-uclinux: ../.././gcc/config/lm32/uclinux-elf.h:70: error: "LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC" redefined [-Werror] Product: gcc Version: unkno

[Bug target/100332] New: mcore-elf: error: 'prev_addr' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100332 Bug ID: 100332 Summary: mcore-elf: error: 'prev_addr' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug target/100603] New: csky: config/csky/csky.h:402:13: error: comparison of unsigned expression in '>= 0' is always true [-Werror=type-limits]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100603 Bug ID: 100603 Summary: csky: config/csky/csky.h:402:13: error: comparison of unsigned expression in '>= 0' is always true [-Werror=type-limits] Product: gcc Ver

[Bug tree-optimization/56457] Bogus warning: loop-invariant.c:786:20: error: unused variable ‘regno’ when building vax-*-*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug bootstrap/100730] New: h8300-linux: unused parameter, statement may fall through, control reaches end of non-void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100730 Bug ID: 100730 Summary: h8300-linux: unused parameter, statement may fall through, control reaches end of non-void function Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug bootstrap/100832] New: s390x-linux-gnu: wrong number of alternatives in the output template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100832 Bug ID: 100832 Summary: s390x-linux-gnu: wrong number of alternatives in the output template Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100836] New: microblaze-linux: RTX may be used uninitialized in this function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100836 Bug ID: 100836 Summary: microblaze-linux: RTX may be used uninitialized in this function Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100837] New: nds32le-linux: error: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of 'rtx_def* [2]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100837 Bug ID: 100837 Summary: nds32le-linux: error: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of 'rtx_def* [2]' Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/100841] New: xtensa-linux: dwarf2cfi.c:291:12: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'const unsigned int' and 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100841 Bug ID: 100841 Summary: xtensa-linux: dwarf2cfi.c:291:12: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'const unsigned int' and 'int' Product: gcc

[Bug target/100841] xtensa-linux: dwarf2cfi.c:291:12: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'const unsigned int' and 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100841 --- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Guess following could fix it > --- gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h.jj 2021-01-04 10:25:45.570157539 +0100 > +++ gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h2021-06-01 1

[Bug target/100841] xtensa-linux: dwarf2cfi.c:291:12: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'const unsigned int' and 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100841 --- Comment #4 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Builds now. Thanks a lot!

[Bug target/100841] xtensa-linux: dwarf2cfi.c:291:12: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'const unsigned int' and 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100841 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/108928] New: epiphany-elf: unrecognizable insn (internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791) triggered during Modula-2 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108928 Bug ID: 108928 Summary: epiphany-elf: unrecognizable insn (internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791) triggered during Modula-2 build Product: gcc

[Bug driver/108929] New: bfin-openbsd: Issues calling `as` when trying to build Module-2 components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108929 Bug ID: 108929 Summary: bfin-openbsd: Issues calling `as` when trying to build Module-2 components Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug driver/108932] New: amd64-pc-solaris2.11:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108932 Bug ID: 108932 Summary: amd64-pc-solaris2.11: Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver Assignee:

[Bug tree-optimization/106900] Regression after memchr optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106900 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr-elf, pru-elf, rl78-elf --- Comm

[Bug target/108932] amd64-pc-solaris2.11:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108932 --- Comment #3 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Thanks a lot! Ftr: `--with-gas` is accepted, but `--with-gnu-as` flags the inclusion of `usegas.h`.

[Bug target/109026] New: m32c-elf: ICE while building Modula-2 components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109026 Bug ID: 109026 Summary: m32c-elf: ICE while building Modula-2 components Product: gcc Version: hsa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/109026] m32c-elf: ICE while building Modula-2 components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109026 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Version|hsa |13.0 --- Comment #1 from Jan-Benedi

[Bug tree-optimization/103798] memchr with a (small) constant string should be expanded inline.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103798 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/106900] New: Regression after memchr optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106900 Bug ID: 106900 Summary: Regression after memchr optimization Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-opt

[Bug c++/81159] New warning idea: -Wself-move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81159 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #12 fr

[Bug target/100603] csky: config/csky/csky.h:402:13: error: comparison of unsigned expression in '>= 0' is always true [-Werror=type-limits]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100603 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/100832] s390x-linux-gnu: wrong number of alternatives in the output template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100832 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/102196] New: -Wmaybe-uninitialized: Maybe generate helpful hints?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196 Bug ID: 102196 Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized: Maybe generate helpful hints? Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/102196] -Wmaybe-uninitialized: Maybe generate helpful hints?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196 --- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Declaration and possibly uninitialized usage are shown. Ie for said Binutils, I get these messages: microblaze-{elf,linux} [all 2021-09-03 18:17:30] depbase=`echo config/tc-mic

[Bug tree-optimization/102196] -Wmaybe-uninitialized: Maybe generate helpful hints?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196 --- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Calling the compiler again with just adding -fanalyzer doesn't add more information to the output. Do I need to turn on extra warnings to enable static analysis for access to possibly uninitialized varia

[Bug bootstrap/100730] h8300-linux: unused parameter, statement may fall through, control reaches end of non-void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100730 --- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Confirmed that I see this as fixed in the logs. (And I need to put that build host to the datacenter in Münster and announce it publically...)

[Bug middle-end/102395] New: [nvptx, vax] enum reg_class inferred as signed / unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102395 Bug ID: 102395 Summary: [nvptx, vax] enum reg_class inferred as signed / unsigned Product: gcc Version: analyzer branch Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/102395] [nvptx, vax] enum reg_class inferred as signed / unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102395 --- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- I'll fetch that patch and stuff it in the autobuilder, then let it run for nvptx, vax and a few others.

[Bug middle-end/102395] [nvptx, vax] enum reg_class inferred as signed / unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102395 --- Comment #8 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Autobuilder also picked it, fixed for all.

[Bug c++/107638] [13 Regression] options.h:239:36: error: token "." is not valid in preprocessor expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107638 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug c++/107638] [13 Regression] options.h:239:36: error: token "." is not valid in preprocessor expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107638 --- Comment #5 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- All my affected builds are restored.

[Bug regression/107997] New: fd8dd6c03849691 probably uncovered an issue building the Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997 Bug ID: 107997 Summary: fd8dd6c03849691 probably uncovered an issue building the Linux kernel Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug tree-optimization/107997] [13 Regression] r13-4389-gfd8dd6c0384969 probably uncovered an issue building the Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997 --- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > (In reply to Jan-Benedict Glaw from comment #0) > > I'll add the preprocessed sources. > > Could you please? Without it there isn't much that can be done.

[Bug tree-optimization/107997] [13 Regression] r13-4389-gfd8dd6c0384969 probably uncovered an issue building the Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997 --- Comment #4 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Created attachment 54049 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54049&action=edit Reduced testcase (cvise)

[Bug tree-optimization/107997] [13 Regression] r13-4389-gfd8dd6c0384969 probably uncovered an issue building the Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997 --- Comment #3 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Created attachment 54048 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54048&action=edit Original preprocessed source

[Bug tree-optimization/107997] [10/11/12/13 Regression] r13-4389-gfd8dd6c0384969 probably uncovered an issue building the Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997 --- Comment #10 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- I gave that patch a try: GCC build is successful, as is the Linux build afterwards using that toolchain. (Cannot test the resulting kernel of course---I don't have the hardware.)

[Bug tree-optimization/108095] New: powerpc-linux / powerpc64-linux: ICEs when building Linux's arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c (asm goto)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108095 Bug ID: 108095 Summary: powerpc-linux / powerpc64-linux: ICEs when building Linux's arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c (asm goto) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107997] [10/11/12/13 Regression] r13-4389-gfd8dd6c0384969 probably uncovered an issue building the Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107997 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/108095] powerpc-linux / powerpc64-linux: ICEs when building Linux's arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c (asm goto)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108095 --- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- I'll give that patch a spin, build the cross-compilers and try to build the affected Linux configurations.

[Bug tree-optimization/108095] powerpc-linux / powerpc64-linux: ICEs when building Linux's arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c (asm goto)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108095 --- Comment #7 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Created attachment 54090 [details] > gcc13-pr108095.patch Compiler builds for me and the ICE went away for all affected Linux configurations. Though I canno

[Bug rtl-optimization/84345] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #17 fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/90282] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed in snapshot-20190429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282 --- Comment #14 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- GCC 13 (as of g:02c031088ac0bbf) triggers this for Linux's kallsys.c (f9ff5644bcc04221bae56f922) for ia64.

[Bug target/87281] qsort checking ICE in ia64_reorg building libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87281 --- Comment #13 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- GCC 13 (as of g:02c031088ac0bbf) triggers this for Linux's kallsys.c (f9ff5644bcc04221bae56f922) for ia64.

[Bug tree-optimization/110248] ivopts could under-cost for some addressing modes on len_{load,store}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110248 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #12 f

[Bug target/108928] epiphany-elf: unrecognizable insn (internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791) triggered during Modula-2 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108928 --- Comment #1 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Last confirmed: g:0a846340b99675d57fc2f2923a0412134eed09d3 (cf. http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/gcc-epiphany-elf/36)

[Bug gcov-profile/100289] [11/12/13 Regression] libgcc/libgcov.h: bootstrap failure due to missing #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100289 --- Comment #20 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- I see this as well for my CI builds using a (slightly hacked to use local copies of the GIT trees) build-many-glibcs.py (from glibc.) If you call call: /var/lib/laminar/run/glibcbot-alpha-linux-gnu/21

[Bug gcov-profile/100289] [11/12/13 Regression] libgcc/libgcov.h: bootstrap failure due to missing #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100289 --- Comment #21 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- But the basic question is: Should a first build pass --disable-gcov (glibc's failure to provide this) or should GCC detect that there's (not yet) no sys/mman.h (GCC problem)?

[Bug target/100836] microblaze-linux: RTX may be used uninitialized in this function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100836 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/100268] lm32-uclinux: ../.././gcc/config/lm32/uclinux-elf.h:70: error: "LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC" redefined [-Werror]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100268 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106900] Regression after memchr optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106900 --- Comment #8 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Thanks a lot! I scheduled builds for the three affected targets (from my target list.) The box is quite loaded right now (and a few jobs a before those three), so I guess it'll take a few hours.

[Bug tree-optimization/106900] Regression after memchr optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106900 --- Comment #9 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- All three target configurations reported a successful build. Thanks!

[Bug target/100332] mcore-elf: error: 'prev_addr' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100332 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCON

[Bug target/87281] qsort checking ICE in ia64_reorg building libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87281 --- Comment #14 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Still observable as of a8994014041: [...] ia64-linux-gcc -Wp,-MMD,kernel/.kallsyms.o.d -nostdinc -I./arch/ia64/include -I./arch/ia64/include/generated -I./include -I./arch/ia64/include/uapi -I./arch/

[Bug tree-optimization/110420] New: internal compiler error: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch, at tree-cfg.cc:6262

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110420 Bug ID: 110420 Summary: internal compiler error: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch, at tree-cfg.cc:6262 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug tree-optimization/110420] [12/13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch due to simple_dce_from_worklist removing `asm goto`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110420 --- Comment #7 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Confirmed: This patch fixes the issue for me with the Linux PPC builds.