https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102876
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> But I'm worried about larger TUs where not all dynamic initialization can be
> optimized into constants. E.g. if there remain any function calls where the
> ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107492
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106644
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-11-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107598
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107781
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107781
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101733
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107504
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84471
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41874
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.5.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from Jason Mer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Another significant part of the problem is that vector doesn't have a
generic initializer_list constructor. Adding
template
_GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
vector(initializer_list<__elt> __l,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> Even if we don't emit a loop (which I still think is the way to go for
> larger initializers because anything else means just too large code), can't
> there fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105838
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> > Jonathan, has anyone suggested adding generic init_list constructors to the
> > container classes?
>
> Not that I'm aware of. There might be concerns abou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 54076
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54076&action=edit
patch to follow other implementations
Here's the patch if we do want to go that way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108096
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108096
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53288
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108299
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-06
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96765
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105492
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105541
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |ice-on-valid-code
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105541
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Simpler:
static_assert(requires { []{}; });
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |10.4
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |11.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98717
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102071
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82980
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 82980, which changed state.
Bug 82980 Summary: [9/10 Regression] template keyword should not be required
for captured decl of the "base" type since r6-6866-gff2faafcf689b6c2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105245
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100608
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102300
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[11 Regression] Qualified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 41723, which changed state.
Bug 41723 Summary: [9/10 Regression] Error when using a qualified name to
declare a nested template instantiation as a friend of the containing template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102300
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> While GCC 12.1 rejects the code with:
>
> ../../buildtools/third_party/libc++/trunk/include/string:742:13: error:
> anonymous struct with base classes
>
> Rejec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105575
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102479
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yahan at iscas dot ac.cn
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100079
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103681
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 103681, which changed state.
Bug 103681 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] Unusual behavior for tail padding with
different c++ standards and NSDMI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103681
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91618
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|11.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100032
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91933
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 91933, which changed state.
Bug 91933 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have
'exceptional' (error_mark) in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96673
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 96311, which changed state.
Bug 96311 Summary: [9 Regression] false positive for -Wunused-but-set-variable
(const/constexpr identifier used in generic lambda)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180
Bug 89180 depends on bug 96311, which changed state.
Bug 96311 Summary: [9 Regression] false positive for -Wunused-but-set-variable
(const/constexpr identifier used in generic lambda)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101717
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 101717, which changed state.
Bug 101717 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE capturing static member within stateless
generic lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101717
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99901
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59950
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101442
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101698
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65211
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91217
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055
Bug 58055 depends on bug 91217, which changed state.
Bug 91217 Summary: [9 Regression] Returning std::array from lambda results in
an extra copy step on return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91217
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105265
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99066
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105589
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706
Bug 91706 depends on bug 101078, which changed state.
Bug 101078 Summary: [9/10 Regression] Rejected code since
r12-1272-gf07edb5d7f3e7721
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105580
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
Summary|[12/13 Reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105589
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105589
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105492
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105589
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105553
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105553
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
I implemented P0929R2 in r11-5036.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105619
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105492
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105623
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105655
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105722
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|11.3
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105722
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105716
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105623
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j-l.wynen at hotmail dot de
--- Comment
701 - 800 of 1570 matches
Mail list logo