https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95192
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98929
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98929
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98939
Bug ID: 98939
Summary: [C++23] Implement P1787R6 "Declarations and where to
find them"
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
URL: http://wg21.link/p1787r6
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98939
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.0|11.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98941
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |emsr at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98926
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Hmm, I just did a bootstrap/check on gcc112, and don't get any of the ICEs, but
I do see the alias-decl-52.C failure, so I'll poke more at that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95192
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98802
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98802
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98717
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96591
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83997
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96591
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |lto
Assignee|jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98995
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-08
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98994
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98990
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98990
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98326
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98994
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96905
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96905
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98326
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97296
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Further reduced:
template struct A {
using type = typename T::type;
};
template class B {
template ::type X>
B(U);
};
struct C {
B b;
C();
};
int main() {
C c;
}
We run into trouble trying to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4)
> I think perhaps it's wrong to do substitution at this point because X has no
> default argument. Giving it a default argument causes clang 10 to also
> reject th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 50174
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50174&action=edit
proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
So, for the second example, the compiler's process is
test() initializes the tuple member
looks for tuple(Test) ctor
considers tuple(tuple&&)
looks for conversion from Test to tuple
considers _ImplicitCtor
i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] Tuple |[9/10 Regression] Tuple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98810
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96485
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95883
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drewb at valvesoftware dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|10.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94492
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #18)
> ever since Nathan's r11-2876. As this commit mentions, should we enable the
> maybe_save_operator_binding / push_operator_binding mechanism for all
> templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
Bug ID: 100476
Summary: coroutines: questionable handling of void
get_return_object
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> I am by no means an expert at reading standardese - and it might be that I'm
> not alone, (library writers might have made the same assumption) but it
> seems to m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #2)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> > I am by no means an expert at reading standardese - and it might be that I'm
> > not alone, (library writers might
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100299
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100517
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100594
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-14
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100596
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Rejecting such code was the point of the patch. I guess we'll have to
> either downgrade to a warning or just not complain about GNU attributes at
> all.
Let's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100644
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-18
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100367
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100372
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100261
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100367
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100261
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100372
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100644
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100659
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100634
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100634
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100659
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80456
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 52625, which changed state.
Bug 52625 Summary: [9/10 Regression] Incorrect specialization semantics of
friend class template declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86355
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89370
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91859
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100963
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100963
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
Bug ID: 100974
Summary: [C++23] Implement if consteval
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100975
Bug ID: 100975
Summary: [C++23] Allow pointer to array of auto
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100976
Bug ID: 100976
Summary: [C++23] Make constexpr reference temp constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977
Bug ID: 100977
Summary: [C++23] Implement C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode
Standard Annex 31
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100975
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
int a[3];
auto (*p)[3] = &a;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100976
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
constexpr const int &r = 42;
static_assert(r == 42);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100976
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Or rather,
int main()
{
constexpr const int &r = 42;
static_assert(r == 42); // { dg-bogus "" }
}
[expr.const]/4.7 says that "a temporary object of non-volatile const-qualified
literal type whose lifet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
As I mentioned on IRC, it seems like this may just be a matter of properly
passing down flags/member_p in the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10 Regression] ICE: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100879
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-08
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100879
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression]
|-fno
201 - 300 of 1570 matches
Mail list logo