https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Known to fail|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95675
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99108
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95675
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #2 from Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99583
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
*** Bug 99583 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Reduced more:
template
int sink(Args&&... args) { return 2; }
template
auto fwd(const T1& t1) {
return
[] (auto&&... ts1) {
return
[...ts1 = ts1] () {
return sink(ts1...);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] g++ |[9/10 Regression] g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #7)
>
> Maybe the note in [class.mem.general]/7 is relevant:
>
> A complete-class context of a nested class is also a complete-class
> context of any enclosing clas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8)
> This is related to CWG1890, and the general issue that we don't currently
> parse on demand like we do instantiate on demand for templates.
("We" in this sentenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97900
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91217
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91217
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
|i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 regression]|[9/10 regression] noexcept
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97900
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] g++|[9/10 Regression] g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99066
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99066
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Perhaps caused by PR23691 changes?
r104041, yes. Bizarre that this went unnoticed for over 15 years.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99066
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95317
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98440
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98440
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] Accepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98481
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98810
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99795
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91241
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91241
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99901
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99901
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Keywords|wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99909
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96673
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96673
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99795
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 50524
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50524&action=edit
WIP Fix
This patch uses IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR to get the narrowing error, but more and
more changes are being nece
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99795
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] Error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91849
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91849
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
|M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 50531
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50531&action=edit
WIP patches
Here's that 2019 work in progress, relative to r267647.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83502
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503
--- Comment #24 from Jason Merrill ---
*** Bug 83502 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90451
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90451
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 50537
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50537&action=edit
WIP Fix
Here's an approach that moves the mark_used calls closer to where the functions
are actually used. We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99547
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99180
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99180
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[10/11 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99118
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93295
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wang_feng at live dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96873
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93295
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mateusz.pusz at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93295
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99180
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93085
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99675
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lnwirz at chem dot helsinki.fi
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98800
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
I'm getting a correct (if obscure) error message before the ICE:
wa.C:4:71: error: use of ‘this’ in a constant expression
4 | template static auto func() -> enable_if_t()>;
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97974
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100032
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97974
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[9/10/11 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91933
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91933
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100054
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100054
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100032
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88742
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88742
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
|D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90674
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100032
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93951
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90674
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99478
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99478
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE|[9/10 Regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] Invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93314
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 50594
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50594&action=edit
patch for stage 1
A more general, but also more risky, fix for next stage 1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
1 - 100 of 1366 matches
Mail list logo