https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93675
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93169
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed by r273623.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90546
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gufideg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91051
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93589
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 92556, which changed state.
Bug 92556 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE if using dependent name inside lambda
expression in simple-requirement since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92556
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92556
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88690
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88183
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87513
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89917
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 8.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92745
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89831
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90546
Bug 90546 depends on bug 86521, which changed state.
Bug 86521 Summary: [8 Regression] GCC 8 selects incorrect overload of
ref-qualified conversion operator template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86521
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86521
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88380
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87685
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87554
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86429
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 86429, which changed state.
Bug 86429 Summary: [8 Regression] lambda capture breaks constexpr-ness
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86429
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87327
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87480
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87748
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88394
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87652
Bug 87652 depends on bug 86747, which changed state.
Bug 86747 Summary: [8 Regression] rejects-valid with redundant friend
declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86747
What|Removed |Added
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 8.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87651
Bug 87651 depends on bug 86747, which changed state.
Bug 86747 Summary: [8 Regression] rejects-valid with redundant friend
declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86747
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87651
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 8.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92745
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90951
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92003
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93140
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #43 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #42)
> I suspect the V_C_E inhibits tree-ssa-uninit.c code to avoid false
> positives. If we know the range of the V_C_E operand is narrow enough that
> it fits int
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 88323
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47933
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47933&action=edit
beginning of implementation
Making the example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #45 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #44)
> I suspect in the context where SRA creates the V_C_E we don't have enough
> information to know that the range of the input object is constrained
> enough. We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93279
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 86917, which changed state.
Bug 86917 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at
cp/constexpr.c:2798
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81862
Bug 81862 depends on bug 86917, which changed state.
Bug 86917 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at
cp/constexpr.c:2798
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 88256, which changed state.
Bug 88256 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
make_ssa_name_fn) with VLA cast, C++ FE missing DECL_EXPRs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88256
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86917
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93442
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 90732, which changed state.
Bug 90732 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE with std::apply after variable length
array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90732
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90732
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-06
03:33:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 6 03:33:45 2013
New Revision: 195779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195779
Log:
PR c++/56208
* pt.c (fn_type_u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56177
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-06
03:34:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 6 03:33:55 2013
New Revision: 195780
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195780
Log:
PR c++/56177
* decl.c (start_pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56177
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56208
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54122
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-06
04:24:28 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 6 04:24:18 2013
New Revision: 195781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195781
Log:
PR c++/54122
* tree.c (lvalue_k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54122
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-06
13:42:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 6 13:42:06 2013
New Revision: 195806
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195806
Log:
PR c++/54122
* tree.c (lvalue_k
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-06
13:43:54 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47409
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-06
14:59:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> But, what to do about unions? The standard says that only one union member is
> active, but which one it is? I think the compiler generally can't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-06
18:26:37 UTC ---
OK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56239
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-07
15:02:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> gcc48-pr56239.patch
OK.
> BTW, I wonder where the standard resolves the ambiguity between parsing it as
> a
> function call with parenthesized
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56237
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-07
15:18:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 29383 [details]
> gcc48-pr56237.patch
OK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56235
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-07
16:32:39 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 7 16:32:28 2013
New Revision: 195854
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195854
Log:
PR c++/56235
* method.c (do_bui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56235
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
||gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-07
17:38:58 UTC ---
Oops, didn't notice you had attached a patch until after I hit save.
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachme
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56238
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-09
20:38:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Feb 9 20:38:33 2013
New Revision: 195920
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195920
Log:
PR c++/56238
* pt.c (build_non_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-09
20:39:21 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Feb 9 20:39:13 2013
New Revision: 195922
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195922
Log:
PR c++/56247
* pt.c (eq_special
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-09
20:47:31 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Feb 9 20:47:24 2013
New Revision: 195923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195923
Log:
PR c++/56247
* pt.c (eq_special
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56247
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-09
20:54:05 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Feb 9 20:53:59 2013
New Revision: 195924
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195924
Log:
PR c++/56247
* pt.c (eq_special
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|4.7.3 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56238
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-11
15:44:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I don't understand why fully declared templates like Boost's shared_ptr have a
> visibility at all.
I'm not sure why they would. Are you compili
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-11
15:47:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 11 15:47:46 2013
New Revision: 195943
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195943
Log:
PR c++/56268
* semantics.c (cla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-11
16:21:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 11 16:21:10 2013
New Revision: 195945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195945
Log:
PR c++/56268
* semantics.c (cla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56268
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56291
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-12
17:37:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 12 17:36:58 2013
New Revision: 195986
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195986
Log:
PR c++/56291
* semantics.c (so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56291
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-12
17:40:38 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 12 17:40:32 2013
New Revision: 195987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195987
Log:
PR c++/56291
* semantics.c (so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56291
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56285
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-12
20:47:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 12 20:47:15 2013
New Revision: 195990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195990
Log:
PR c++/56285
* method.c (add_on
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56285
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
05:06:52 UTC ---
This is the purpose of the warning; to indicate when some fields do not have an
explicit initializer during aggregate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
17:56:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:56:05 2013
New Revision: 196021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196021
Log:
PR c++/56135
* pt.c (tsubst_cop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56155
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
17:56:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:56:16 2013
New Revision: 196022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196022
Log:
PR c++/56155
* decl.c (build_en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
17:56:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:56:28 2013
New Revision: 196023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196023
Log:
PR c++/55993
* semantics.c (cxx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55879
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
17:56:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 17:56:38 2013
New Revision: 196024
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196024
Log:
PR c++/55879
* semantics.c (cxx
||2013-02-13
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
18:15:42 UTC ---
There's no need to split this out.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55710 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
18:15:42 UTC ---
*** Bug 55720 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
18:18:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 18:17:39 2013
New Revision: 196025
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196025
Log:
PR c++/55710
* semantics.c (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55581
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
18:58:28 UTC ---
Really closing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55526
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
501 - 600 of 8895 matches
Mail list logo