at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91953
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] G++|[8 Regression] G++ rejects
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92601
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91678
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #10)
> Don't know if I should pursue this backport.
Seems like it depends on other fixes, not sure how hard they will be to find.
Your call.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90432
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90997
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91607
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|8.5 |10.0
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Doesn't seem worthwhile to try to find and backport the fix for an
ice-on-invalid.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88820
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90338
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|8.5 |10.0
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
No need to backport this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h2+bugs at fsfe dot org
--- Comment #13
|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
The ICE on linux with GCC 9 is from infinite recursion checking the constraints
on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93753
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 88395, which changed state.
Bug 88395 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus,
with -std=c++2a -fconcepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88395
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94041
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
This turned out to be a long-standing bug with split_nonconstant_init (since
4.7, apparently): initializion of individual elements of an aggregate are not a
full-expressions, but split_nonconstant_init was ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93922
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57510
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66139
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|---
Known to work|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93922
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94041
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93596
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93901
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93596
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93907
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93907
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92909
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92068
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93248
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94186
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot
com
--- Co
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94175
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Testcase using fewer C++ features:
struct A {};
extern A a;
int i;
[[gnu::noinline, gnu::noclone]]
void f(A) { ++i; }
int main()
{
f(a);
}
|--- |10.0
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for GCC 10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94175
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|--- |10.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94186
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5)
> I don't think we need heavy machinery linking new and delete (and if we did
> I'd be tempted to store it in some global table rather than in the nodes).
> The most
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90711
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94205
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94205
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
C++14 version that goes back to the introduction of C++14 constexpr in GCC 5:
struct S
{
struct A
{
S *p;
constexpr A(S* p): p(p) {}
constexpr operator int() { p->a = 5; return 6; }
};
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91966
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] pack |[8 Regression] pack
|e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94453
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-04
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94453
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Further reduced:
struct f {
static constexpr int d = 3;
typedef int e;
};
template struct x { };
template using n = x;
template auto v() -> n;
void af() { v(); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94205
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67825
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91377
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67825, which changed state.
Bug 67825 Summary: [concepts] expression constraint bug when taking address of
a member function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67825
What|Removed
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94462
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94481
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94480
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94034
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
|--- |INVALID
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
As described in my patch for PR 94034, these testcases are not guaranteed to
work because A is trivially copyable and therefore the implementation can
introduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94034
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #6)
> So I suppose my comment on Paolo's patch was wrong, and this is only a
> diagnostic quality issue after all.
Ah, there is a constexpr issue to fix: if we add con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94537
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #3)
> As described in my patch for PR 94034, these testcases are not guaranteed to
s/patch/comment/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94523
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94546
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94510
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94546
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94510
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94645
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94583
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79585
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90750
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79585
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|9.4
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180
Bug 89180 depends on bug 79585, which changed state.
Bug 79585 Summary: spurious -Wunused-variable on a pointer with attribute
unused in function template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79585
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90992
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |10.0
Status|WAITING
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90748
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 48413
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48413&action=edit
diagnostic patch
diagnostic improvement, waiting for gcc 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90748
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 48412
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48412&action=edit
fix
fix, waiting for gcc 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93822
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94888
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91133
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91133
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
This is really a question of partial ordering; determining whether the partial
specialization is more specialized than the primary class template is
equivalent to this testcase:
template struct Id { typedef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90749
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed on trunk by r11-17-g82d5decef38b5562d97c49a70ca2636a08769dbc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90748
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95221
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95221
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
1 - 100 of 8691 matches
Mail list logo
