--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-24 20:56 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-24 21:00 ---
Fixed in 4.3.0. Not sure if the fix should go into 4.2.x, since it's an ABI
change.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33571
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 20:58 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 18:11 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 18:08 ---
Subject: Bug 10179
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 28 18:07:57 2007
New Revision: 128871
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128871
Log:
PR c++/10179
* class.c (layout_empty_bas
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-30 02:41 ---
Subject: Bug 33094
Author: jason
Date: Sun Sep 30 02:41:39 2007
New Revision: 128890
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128890
Log:
PR c++/33094
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-01 20:53 ---
Subject: Bug 15745
Author: jason
Date: Mon Oct 1 20:53:09 2007
New Revision: 128917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128917
Log:
PR c++/15745
* except.c (prepare_eh_ty
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-01 20:54 ---
This is not a compiler bug; I forgot to apply the same patch to vla4.C on the
branch that I did on the trunk. Fixed now.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 10:43 ---
Subject: Bug 15764
Author: jason
Date: Wed Oct 3 10:43:42 2007
New Revision: 128979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128979
Log:
PR c++/15764
* cp/decl.c (wrap_cleanups
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 18:26 ---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 21:54 ---
The error the trunk gives is correct; this is not one of the allowed uses of a
member function name in [expr.prim]p10.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #28 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 23:54 ---
Changing the testcase to use decltype instead of typeof produces this error
with current sources:
wa.C:2: sorry, unimplemented: zero-operand casts cannot be mangled due to a
defect in the C++ ABI
Now that we have
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 01:01 ---
Subject: Bug 11756
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 4 01:01:00 2007
New Revision: 128999
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128999
Log:
PR c++/11756
* mangle.c (wr
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 01:01 ---
This works with decltype, so I'm just going to change the ICE using typeof to a
sorry.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 01:05 ---
The testcase works fine if I change typeof to __decltype and add the necessary
template<> template<> to the third line.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 01:29 ---
Both bug32182 and test_4 work for me with pre-4.3.0 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, so
I'm going to set known to work for 4.3.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 01:45 ---
This is not a bug; Mark's comment in bug 21089 had to do with the fact that
[basic.start.init] says that static initialization happens before dynamic
initialization. Using foo() in Y's initializer makes Y d
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 01:50 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7046 ***
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 01:50 ---
*** Bug 21560 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 07:53 ---
Can you spell decltype?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11756
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 08:48 ---
Subject: Bug 32470
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 4 08:48:23 2007
New Revision: 129003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129003
Log:
PR c++/32470
* name-
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 08:49 ---
Less flippantly, I don't see the point in spending much effort on getting
typeof to work properly inside templates when there's a standardized language
feature you can use instead which is also better spe
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 08:50 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 09:34 ---
decltype is the C++0x equivalent of the GCC typeof extension; if you replace
the word "typeof" in the testcase with "decltype" and compile with -fstd=c++0x,
the testcase will work as expec
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 17:58 ---
Subject: Bug 20416
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 4 17:58:07 2007
New Revision: 129020
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129020
Log:
PR c++/20416
* call.c (initialize_r
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 18:00 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 20:52 ---
Subject: Bug 33094
Author: jason
Date: Tue Oct 9 20:52:24 2007
New Revision: 129180
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129180
Log:
PR c++/32470
* name-
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 20:52 ---
Subject: Bug 32470
Author: jason
Date: Tue Oct 9 20:52:24 2007
New Revision: 129180
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129180
Log:
PR c++/32470
* name-
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 21:10 ---
Fixed for 4.2.3.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 21:11 ---
Fixed for 4.2.3.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-17 17:07 ---
Similar to Bug 15764.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 18:40 ---
Subject: Bug 37006
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 4 18:39:16 2008
New Revision: 138648
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138648
Log:
PR c++/37006
* pt.c (tsubst_decl
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 19:37 ---
In general, it seems like SRA needs to be more conservative with
TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P types such as these.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37016
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 19:55 ---
Subject: Bug 36963
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 4 19:53:57 2008
New Revision: 138652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138652
Log:
PR c++/36963
* typeck2.c (check_n
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 20:17 ---
However, it's not clear to me that pointers to member functions need to have
TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P in general; I'm testing a patch to set
TYPE_CANONICAL appropriately.
--
http://gcc.gnu.or
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 21:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=16017)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16017&action=view)
Patch to check TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P in useless_type_conversion
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-04 21:03 ---
Well, that's the problem then: we have two POINTER_TYPE to METHOD_TYPE which
are considered equivalent in the front end, but not equivalent in the tree-ssa
types_compatible_p.
The specific bug seems to be
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 22:23 ---
Subject: Bug 37016
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 5 22:22:00 2008
New Revision: 138740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138740
Log:
PR c++/37016
* tr
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 01:55 ---
Subject: Bug 37016
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 6 01:54:31 2008
New Revision: 138755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138755
Log:
PR c++/37016
* tr
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 02:26 ---
Subject: Bug 37016
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 6 02:25:20 2008
New Revision: 138756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138756
Log:
PR c++/37016
* decl.c (build_ptrmemf
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 03:14 ---
Fixed in two different ways.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-29 16:09 ---
Dodji is right: since the variable is shared between all concrete instances,
there is no need to repeat anything about it in the concrete instance. The
debugger should find the information it wants in the abstract
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-30 23:14 ---
Subject: Bug 37288
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 30 23:12:45 2008
New Revision: 139811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139811
Log:
PR c++/37288
* pt.c (dependent_type_p
ers are declared too late
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 19:35 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-01 19:35 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 04:11 ---
Subject: Bug 37208
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 3 04:10:27 2008
New Revision: 139926
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139926
Log:
PR c++/37208
* call.c (build_over_cal
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37376
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37376
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-17 16:12 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-17 16:13 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-17 16:14 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-17 16:19 ---
This doesn't have anything to do with accessibility, but it is a new bug.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-17 17:31 ---
Fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-17 21:17 ---
8.5.1 says "An aggregate is an array or a class (Clause 9) with ... no base
classes (Clause 10)"
Lawrence's suggestion won't work because the copy constructor is deleted. To
make aggregate
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-18 17:01 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Lawrence's suggestion won't work because the copy constructor is deleted.
It seems I was wrong about this: the wording that went into the standard
doesn't require the
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37596
--- Comment #55 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-23 20:43 ---
It seems reasonable to me for try { X } catch... to mean X when
-fno-exceptions. We don't need to error except on throw.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25191
unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37729
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 17:50 ---
Yep.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37801
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 18:28 ---
Contra Mark, this seems like a WONTFIX to me.
g++ assumes that if a class has a vtable, if we're going to do anything with it
we'll create an object of that type at some point, which will use the vtable,
an
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-05 15:49 ---
Subject: Bug 35219
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 5 15:48:01 2008
New Revision: 141612
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141612
Log:
PR c++/35219
* cp-tre
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 04:54 ---
Subject: Bug 34196
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 04:53:33 2008
New Revision: 131710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131710
Log:
PR c++/34196
* tree.h (TRY_CATCH_IS
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 14:48 ---
Subject: Bug 34846
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 14:48:05 2008
New Revision: 131724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131724
Log:
PR c++/33959
* pt.c (tsubst_aggr_typ
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 14:48 ---
Subject: Bug 33959
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 14:48:05 2008
New Revision: 131724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131724
Log:
PR c++/33959
* pt.c (tsubst_aggr_typ
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 14:48 ---
Subject: Bug 34573
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 14:48:05 2008
New Revision: 131724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131724
Log:
PR c++/33959
* pt.c (tsubst_aggr_typ
--- Comment #37 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 15:37 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Since complex types are arithmetic types in GNU C++, we should allow standard
> conversions to them from integers, just as we do for all other arithmetic
> types.
>
> How
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 16:00 ---
Subject: Bug 33959
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 15:59:57 2008
New Revision: 131725
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131725
Log:
PR c++/33959
* pt.c (tsubst_aggr_typ
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 19:51 ---
Subject: Bug 34912
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jan 22 19:50:37 2008
New Revision: 131740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131740
Log:
PR c++/34912
* friend.c (do_friend): C
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 20:06 ---
That patch looks right to me. This seems to be a bug caused by the deceptive
name "gen_type_die" which really should be called something like
"gen_main_variant_type_die".
--
http://
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 20:07 ---
Not worth fixing in 4.1/4.2.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 05:12 ---
Subject: Bug 28560
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 23 05:11:58 2008
New Revision: 131755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131755
Log:
PR c++/28560
* decl.c (groktypenam
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 21:24 ---
Subject: Bug 34944
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 23 21:23:32 2008
New Revision: 131765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131765
Log:
PR bootstrap/34944
Modified:
branches
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-23 21:24 ---
That's bizarre, I'm not sure how I managed to check in a different version of
that patch on 4.2 than the one I tested. Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-24 14:42 ---
Subject: Bug 34913
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 24 14:41:32 2008
New Revision: 131779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131779
Log:
PR c++/34913
*
--- Comment #40 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-25 19:45 ---
Subject: Bug 31780
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 25 19:45:11 2008
New Revision: 131832
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131832
Log:
PR c++/31780
* call.c (standard_co
--- Comment #22 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-26 00:42 ---
Subject: Bug 27177
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jan 26 00:41:49 2008
New Revision: 131855
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131855
Log:
PR c++/27177
* class.c (build_base_path
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-25 19:52 ---
Fixed by the patch for bug 31780.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #41 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-25 19:51 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0, not worth fixing on 4.2 branch.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
601 - 700 of 2098 matches
Mail list logo
