--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:04 ---
Fixed
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26571
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:05 ---
Fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:05 ---
Fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:07 ---
I don't think this patch is safe enough to backport to 4.1. Closing.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:07 ---
now closed, too
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 00:28 ---
Subject: Bug 13685
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 8 00:28:30 2006
New Revision: 116775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116775
Log:
PR target/13685
* config/i38
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 00:43 ---
I don't think disabling the assertion is enough. Yes, the compiler would do
the right thing for this particular testcase, but would be wrong if the
subtraction produces a negative result.
Rather, we should
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 05:11 ---
Subject: Bug 27724
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 8 05:11:40 2006
New Revision: 116777
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116777
Log:
PR middle-end/27724
* varasm.c (output_
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 05:16 ---
Subject: Bug 27724
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 8 05:16:26 2006
New Revision: 116778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116778
Log:
PR middle-end/27724
* varasm.c (output_
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 05:38 ---
fixed in 4.1 as well.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 07:14 ---
The bug is in expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver:
/* Now put in the code to restore the frame pointer, and argument
pointer, if needed. */
[...]
emit_move_insn (virtual_stack_vars_rtx, hard_frame_pointer_rtx
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 07:37 ---
The line in question dates back to when __builtin_setjmp was first added in
1996.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28493
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 16:52 ---
Subject: Bug 26957
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 8 16:52:40 2006
New Revision: 116781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116781
Log:
PR c++/26957
* method.c (use_thunk
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 16:54 ---
Subject: Bug 26957
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 8 16:53:55 2006
New Revision: 116782
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116782
Log:
PR c++/26957
* method.c (use_thunk
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 16:54 ---
Applied to 4.0 and 4.1 as well.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 22:37 ---
Hmm, it seems things are a bit more complicated than I thought. Without my
change to expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver, Janis's test passes at -O0 and fails
at -O1; the adjustment of r31 at -O0 is actually co
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 22:52 ---
Janis: the most part of the -fstack-protector patch that seems plausible for
causing this problem was the change to expand_function_end to call
sjlj_emit_function_exit_after at a different point. But that section of
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 06:44 ---
I think if we are going to leave the vector initializer as a CONSTANT, we might
as well just leave it alone entirely if it has TREE_CONSTANT set.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28915
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 07:16 ---
Yep, after merging the 101673 change back in, the compiler works up until
101467, at which point Jakub's ppc sfp change seems to break the testcase (at
-O1).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28493
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 16:11 ---
Subject: Bug 26957
Author: jason
Date: Sat Sep 9 16:11:34 2006
New Revision: 116799
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116799
Log:
PR c++/26957
* method.c (use_thunk): F
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 28996
Author: jason
Date: Sat Sep 9 22:26:53 2006
New Revision: 116800
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116800
Log:
PR c++/28996
* cvt.c (convert_to_void
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 18:02 ---
Subject: Bug 28493
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 12 18:02:36 2006
New Revision: 116900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116900
Log:
PR middle-end/28493
* bu
--- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-14 23:13 ---
Subject: Bug 28493
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 14 23:13:30 2006
New Revision: 116955
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116955
Log:
PR middle-end/28493
* bu
--- Comment #24 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-22 22:42 ---
This has been fixed for a while.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-22 23:23 ---
Subject: Bug 28996
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 22 23:23:08 2006
New Revision: 117155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117155
Log:
PR c++/28996
* cvt.c (convert_to_void
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-22 23:28 ---
Subject: Bug 28996
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 22 23:28:13 2006
New Revision: 117157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117157
Log:
PR c++/28996
* cvt.c (convert_to_void
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-22 23:45 ---
fixed on branches, too
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-06 18:36 ---
Yes. If foo is used in multiple translation units, it violates the ODR because
gazonk is a different type in each translation unit.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-06 21:00 ---
Yes, sorry, I should have said if foo::bar is used in multiple TUs, rather than
foo itself. If foo::bar is defined in only one TU, and is used as an opaque
type in other TUs, you're fine.
Perhaps we should sup
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-29 16:27 ---
Subject: Bug 28266
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 29 16:27:21 2007
New Revision: 121288
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121288
Log:
PR c++/28266
* gimplify.c (gimplify_tar
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 18:01 ---
Subject: Bug 28266
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 2 18:01:22 2007
New Revision: 121514
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121514
Log:
PR c++/28266
* gimplify.c (gimplify_tar
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-02 18:49 ---
Subject: Bug 31187
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 2 18:49:21 2007
New Revision: 123432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123432
Log:
PR c
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-02 20:12 ---
Subject: Bug 31187
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 2 20:12:15 2007
New Revision: 123434
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123434
Log:
PR c
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-09 22:43 ---
Fixed in 4.2 branch and trunk.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 00:43 ---
Subject: Bug 31074
Author: jason
Date: Sat Apr 14 00:43:18 2007
New Revision: 123805
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123805
Log:
PR c++/31074
* call.c (reference_bindi
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 02:27 ---
Subject: Bug 31074
Author: jason
Date: Sat Apr 14 02:27:02 2007
New Revision: 123807
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123807
Log:
PR c++/31074
* call.c (reference_bindi
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 02:29 ---
Subject: Bug 31074
Author: jason
Date: Sat Apr 14 02:29:29 2007
New Revision: 123808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123808
Log:
PR c++/31074
* call.c (reference_bindi
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 00:54 ---
I believe that this change will pessimize alias analysis somewhat; improved
alias analysis was the reason for my change to model base access with
COMPONENT_REF. But I'll leave this alone until I get around to
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #24 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 15:08 ---
Subject: Bug 7302
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 20 15:08:24 2007
New Revision: 127649
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127649
Log:
PR c++/7302
* cp/class.c (finish_struct_
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #31 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-22 17:23 ---
Subject: Bug 29365
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 22 17:23:37 2007
New Revision: 127711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127711
Log:
PR c++/29365
* pt.c (outermost_tin
--- Comment #32 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-22 20:40 ---
Subject: Bug 29365
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 22 20:40:30 2007
New Revision: 127716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127716
Log:
PR c++/29365
* pt.c (outermost_tin
--- Comment #33 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-22 21:50 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #53 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-27 16:32 ---
Reassigning since H.J. fixed the bug.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #31 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-27 18:41 ---
It seems that G++ is setting TREE_ADDRESSABLE on the RETURN_DECL properly, so
the remaining problem is in the mudflap code. Reassigning to fche.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-27 20:02 ---
Subject: Bug 31337
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 27 20:02:22 2007
New Revision: 127838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127838
Log:
PR c++/31337
* gimplify.c (gimplify_mod
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-27 22:04 ---
Subject: Bug 31337
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 27 22:04:37 2007
New Revision: 127840
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127840
Log:
PR c++/31337
* gimplify.c (gimplify_mod
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 13:57 ---
Subject: Bug 28558
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 28 13:57:09 2007
New Revision: 127859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127859
Log:
PR c++/28558
* cp/decl.c (groktypename)
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 14:00 ---
Fixed in 4.2 and 4.3.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 16:59 ---
Subject: Bug 29000
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 28 16:58:59 2007
New Revision: 127868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127868
Log:
PR c++/29000
* pt.c (build_non_depend
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 19:32 ---
Fixed for 4.3, not going to bother applying to other branches.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 16:30 ---
Fixed for 4.3, IMO not enough evident interest in the bug to bother
backporting.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 16:33 ---
Fixed by Simon Martin.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 12:27 ---
Subject: Bug 14032
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 12:27:21 2007
New Revision: 128076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128076
Log:
PR c++/14032
* pt.c (most_specializ
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 12:28 ---
Subject: Bug 14032
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 12:27:38 2007
New Revision: 128077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128077
Log:
PR c++/14032
* pt.c (most_specializ
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 15:43 ---
Subject: Bug 14032
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 15:43:00 2007
New Revision: 128090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128090
Log:
PR c++/14032
* pt.c (most_specializ
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 18:37 ---
Subject: Bug 31411
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 18:37:33 2007
New Revision: 128100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128100
Log:
PR c++/31411
* except.c (initialize_hand
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 20:18 ---
Subject: Bug 31419
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 4 20:18:05 2007
New Revision: 128102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128102
Log:
PR c++/31419
* call.c (reference_binding
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 16:08 ---
The reduced testcase breaks in the same way with ICC 10.0.023 if I add a
user-defined operator delete to B2. If I add it to D instead, ICC incorrectly
calls the user-defined delete instead of the global delete in the
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 01:25 ---
Subject: Bug 15097
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 6 01:24:59 2007
New Revision: 128172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128172
Log:
PR c++/15097
* init.c (build_dele
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 03:33 ---
Subject: Bug 15745
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 6 03:33:46 2007
New Revision: 128174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128174
Log:
PR c++/15745
* except.c (prepare_eh_ty
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 05:36 ---
This version of the test breaks under ICC:
--
extern "C" void abort ();
int counter = 0;
int thrown = 0;
struct a {
~a () { if (!thrown++) throw 1; }
};
int f (a const&, const
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 05:50 ---
Vague references:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00247.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17743
Seems like Mark and/or Nathan have/had state on this that they haven't shared
wit
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-09 04:33 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 15:35 ---
Fixed for 4.2.2.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 16:04 ---
Fixed for 4.2.2 and 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 16:05 ---
Fixed for 4.2.2 and 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 16:06 ---
Fixed for 4.2.2 and 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 14:28 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #25 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 14:29 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work
--- Comment #26 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 14:30 ---
Change state.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 14:31 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 02:36 ---
Subject: Bug 19407
Author: jason
Date: Sun Sep 23 02:36:34 2007
New Revision: 128681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128681
Log:
PR c++/19407
* cp/cp-tree.h (ATTR_IS_D
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 02:39 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 04:33 ---
About #3: When we see the definition of a function, we don't keep information
about where it was first declared. For member functions, we could give the
source position of the class if that would be hel
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 04:37 ---
Subject: Bug 15269
Author: jason
Date: Sun Sep 23 04:37:26 2007
New Revision: 128682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128682
Log:
PR c++/15269
* call.c (build_over_cal
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 04:39 ---
Virtual problem fixed for 4.3.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15269
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 15:27 ---
Subject: Bug 16370
Author: jason
Date: Sun Sep 23 15:27:10 2007
New Revision: 128691
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128691
Log:
PR c++/16370
* decl.c (grokdeclarato
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 15:28 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 17:49 ---
I don't think implementing this can leverage the attribute work. I'd probably
implement it with a new tree code; the alternative would be a new flag in a lot
of places.
--
http://gcc.gnu.or
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-24 13:53 ---
I'm reluctant to backport the changes to 4.2 now because they're fairly
intrusive; I'm not sufficiently confident yet that the change in typedef
handling won't introduce other problems.
--
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-24 20:54 ---
Subject: Bug 33239
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 24 20:54:34 2007
New Revision: 128725
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128725
Log:
PR c++/33239
* pt.c (resolve_typen
501 - 600 of 2098 matches
Mail list logo
