--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 16:20 ---
fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 08:16 ---
The testcase gives the same errors for me when compiled as normal C++ as in PCH
mode.
The problem seems to be that you're removing the Rope_constants namespace name
and creating a name lookup collision betwee
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 08:20 ---
In general, I think using the anonymous namespace in headers is not what you
want.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28514
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 09:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=11978)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11978&action=view)
libstdc++ patch to allow catching forced unwind separately
Trying to move this issue forward: here'
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 09:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=11979)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11979&action=view)
NPTL patch to allow discarding cancellation exception
And here's a completely untested patc
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-01 02:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=11985)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11985&action=view)
libstdc++ patch to prevent ... from catching forced unwird
Finally, this patch stops ... from catching
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-01 02:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=11986)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11986&action=view)
revision to forced-lib.patch that also adds __foreign_exception
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-01 21:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=11988)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11988&action=view)
NPTL patch for sticky cancellation
Revised, tested patch with testcase.
So, there are 3 patches here
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-14 21:25 ---
Subject: Bug 28559
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 14 21:25:03 2006
New Revision: 116137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116137
Log:
PR c++/28559
*
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 00:51 ---
Subject: Bug 28385
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 17 00:51:37 2006
New Revision: 116203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116203
Log:
PR c++/28385
* pt.c (tsubst) [TEMPLATE_T
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 16:27 ---
Subject: Bug 28385
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 18 16:27:03 2006
New Revision: 116243
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116243
Log:
PR c++/28385
* pt.c (tsubst) [TEMPLATE_T
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 16:28 ---
Subject: Bug 28385
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 18 16:28:15 2006
New Revision: 116244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116244
Log:
PR c++/28385
* pt.c (tsubst) [TEMPLATE_T
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-21 20:55 ---
Subject: Bug 27115
Author: jason
Date: Mon Aug 21 20:54:57 2006
New Revision: 116311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116311
Log:
PR c++/27115
* gimplify.c (voidify_wrap
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 16:38 ---
That patch didn't fix it, but I do have a fix now; I'll check it in soon.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 18:27 ---
Subject: Bug 28659
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 22 18:27:26 2006
New Revision: 116329
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116329
Log:
PR c++/28659
* typeck.c (merge_ty
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 18:41 ---
This is too big a change to apply to 4.0 or 4.1, so WONTFIX there.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 18:51 ---
Subject: Bug 28420
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 22 18:51:40 2006
New Revision: 116330
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116330
Log:
PR c++/28420
*
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 19:17 ---
The using-declaration is invalid because foo is not a base of bar. icc also
rejects the testcase if you try to instantiate bar.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 19:34 ---
[basic.def.odr] says that an object that appears in an integral constant
expression is not thereby "used", and it seems reasonable to extend that to not
setting TREE_USED.
--
http://gcc.gnu.or
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 20:22 ---
It seems we've never really handled compound-literals properly within
templates. This doesn't seem like a regression.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28255
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 20:41 ---
This testcase reproduces the bug without new. The problem is that applying
attributes to a type creates a new TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT, which is fundamentally
nonsensical for class types. We really need to impose more
--- Comment #1 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 20:42 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28558 ***
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 20:42 ---
*** Bug 28560 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28558
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 20:43 ---
Related to PR 28659.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28558
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 21:25 ---
*** Bug 24037 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 21:25 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24009 ***
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #47 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 21:54 ---
Accepting so I remember to implement my proposal sometime soon.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #38 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 04:27 ---
Subject: Bug 23372
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 23 04:27:43 2006
New Revision: 116342
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116342
Log:
PR c++/23372
* call.c (build_over_call
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 14:04 ---
Subject: Bug 28687
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 23 14:04:24 2006
New Revision: 116350
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116350
Log:
PR c++/28687
* rtti.c (build_dyna
--- Comment #39 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 14:22 ---
Subject: Bug 23372
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 23 14:22:41 2006
New Revision: 116351
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116351
Log:
PR c++/23372
* call.c (build_over_call
--- Comment #40 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 14:22 ---
Subject: Bug 23372
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 23 14:22:49 2006
New Revision: 116352
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116352
Log:
PR c++/23372
* call.c (build_over_call
--- Comment #41 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 14:33 ---
fixed in 4.0 and 4.1 as well.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 15:54 ---
Subject: Bug 27714
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 24 15:54:39 2006
New Revision: 116379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116379
Log:
PR c++/27714
* pt.c (push_template_decl_
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 16:34 ---
Subject: Bug 27714
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 24 16:34:46 2006
New Revision: 116380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116380
Log:
PR c++/27714
* pt.c (push_template_decl_
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 16:35 ---
Subject: Bug 27714
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 24 16:35:03 2006
New Revision: 116381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116381
Log:
PR c++/27714
* pt.c (push_template_decl_
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 16:35 ---
.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-27 17:44 ---
All diagnostics about meaningless attributes are currently warnings. I'm not
going to change this one to be different from the others.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 08:31 ---
Or perhaps we should ignore the __attribute__ ((packed)) on nonpod_pack, since
one of its fields isn't safe to pack. Yes, that seems like the right way to
handle this testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 04:42 ---
Subject: Bug 27714
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 29 04:42:46 2006
New Revision: 116551
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116551
Log:
PR c++/27714
* pt.c (push_template_decl_
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 06:55 ---
Subject: Bug 26577
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 29 06:55:03 2006
New Revision: 116554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116554
Log:
PR c++/26577
* cvt.c (convert_to_void
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 06:55 ---
Subject: Bug 26670
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 29 06:55:35 2006
New Revision: 116555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116555
Log:
PR c++/26670
* class.c (check_fie
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 07:10 ---
Subject: Bug 26670
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 29 07:10:38 2006
New Revision: 116556
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116556
Log:
PR c++/26670
* class.c (check_fie
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 18:15 ---
Subject: Bug 26577
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 29 18:15:20 2006
New Revision: 116568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116568
Log:
PR c++/26577
* cvt.c (convert_to_void
--- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 02:59 ---
Subject: Bug 26577
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 30 02:59:14 2006
New Revision: 116576
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116576
Log:
PR c++/26577
* cvt.c (convert_to_void
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 15:51 ---
Subject: Bug 26670
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 30 15:51:17 2006
New Revision: 116591
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116591
Log:
PR c++/26670
* class.c (check_fie
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 15:52 ---
Subject: Bug 26670
Author: jason
Date: Wed Aug 30 15:52:12 2006
New Revision: 116592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116592
Log:
PR c++/26670
* class.c (check_fie
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 15:52 ---
fixed on 4.1 branch too.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-01 17:59 ---
Subject: Bug 28899
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 1 17:59:41 2006
New Revision: 116637
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116637
Log:
PR c++/28899
* gi
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-01 18:00 ---
fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 07:51 ---
Fixed in 4.1. The patch is too dangerous to backport to 4.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 23:14 ---
I guess this warning was never implemented in the new parser.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28513
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 23:26 ---
I'm not sure this is actually a bug.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 23:27 ---
Actually, I am, didn't mean to add that comment.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19809
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 01:15 ---
Subject: Bug 19809
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 6 01:15:09 2006
New Revision: 116709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116709
Log:
PR c++/26102
* name-
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 01:15 ---
Subject: Bug 26102
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 6 01:15:09 2006
New Revision: 116709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116709
Log:
PR c++/26102
* name-
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 01:15 ---
Subject: Bug 19809
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 6 01:15:39 2006
New Revision: 116710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116710
Log:
PR c++/26102
* name-
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 01:15 ---
Subject: Bug 26102
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 6 01:15:39 2006
New Revision: 116710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116710
Log:
PR c++/26102
* name-
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 05:25 ---
Subject: Bug 26671
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 6 05:25:29 2006
New Revision: 116714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116714
Log:
PR c++/26671
*
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 05:28 ---
Subject: Bug 26571
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 6 05:28:08 2006
New Revision: 116715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116715
Log:
PR c++/26571
*
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 05:59 ---
This worked in 4.0 by accident, because of the NRV implementation I had in that
release which pushed aggregate return values into the argument list of a call.
This had some problems, so I later changed it to use a
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 17:06 ---
Subject: Bug 26696
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 6 17:06:00 2006
New Revision: 116724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116724
Log:
PR c++/26696
* cvt.c (convert_to_void):
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 18:47 ---
This is also complicated by PR 16269; we don't manage the lifetime of
temporaries, so we don't know whether an initialized temporary is used again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27371
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 20:56 ---
This isn't only a problem in C++. In this C testcase:
struct A
{
int i[42];
};
struct A f();
int main()
{
f();
f();
f();
}
we allocate 3 'struct A' temporaries.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 21:39 ---
I expect that indeed, the test case Kenner mentioned as motivation for the call
to mark_temp_addr_taken doesn't need it any more because of gimplification.
Any temporary that needs to live longer than a s
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 01:13 ---
Subject: Bug 27371
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 01:12:00 2006
New Revision: 116737
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116737
Log:
PR c++/27371
* tree-
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 06:53 ---
Subject: Bug 26195
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 06:53:21 2006
New Revision: 116740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116740
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 07:08 ---
The patch looked good to me, so I applied it. Sorry for the delay.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 07:18 ---
If we resolve A::X to int while parsing the template definition, we need to
check access then, too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26693
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 17:25 ---
Subject: Bug 28284
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 17:25:05 2006
New Revision: 116755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116755
Log:
PR c++/28284
* pt.c (fold_non_depend
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 19:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=12205)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12205&action=view)
Patch to clear DECL_VALUE_EXPR
This patch fixes the testcase in comment #3 with a cross compiler.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 20:24 ---
You can work around this bug with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13685
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 21:06 ---
Subject: Bug 26957
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 21:06:28 2006
New Revision: 116760
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116760
Log:
PR c++/26957
* method.c (use_thunk
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 21:23 ---
waiting for feedback.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26696
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26671
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26195
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26571
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 26102
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 19809
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:27:01 2006
New Revision: 116763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116763
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 26571
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #13 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 19809
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 26195
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 26671
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:38 ---
Subject: Bug 26696
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:38:03 2006
New Revision: 116764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116764
Log:
PR c++/26195
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 22:47 ---
Subject: Bug 27371
Author: jason
Date: Thu Sep 7 22:47:34 2006
New Revision: 116765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116765
Log:
PR c++/27371
* cvt.c (convert_to_void)
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:03 ---
fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:03 ---
fixed
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 23:04 ---
fixed in 4.0, 4.1, 4.2
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
401 - 500 of 2098 matches
Mail list logo
